Is it better for Nikon or Canon

Canon and Nikon are no better than the other. The Canon is softer, the Nikon is sharper, but the Nikon's is rougher if it comes out directly. But after the later stages, it's fine. And the sharp ** has more feeling.

Is it better to be full-frame or half-frame. Obviously, full-frame is good. Fortunately, many people will tell you that the picture quality is better, but many people understand that the better picture quality is determined by the hardware of the camera.

In fact, the advantage of full-frame is that under the same framing, for example, if I take a half-length photo, under large aperture conditions, the full-frame image quality is better, because for example, a 50mm, aperture lens, a half-frame Canon is 80mm, Nikon's is 75mm, and from the perspective of depth of field, full-frame is better, which can be calculated. In other words, full-frame is more effective than half-frame, especially at wide apertures. So the landlord has money, it is recommended to go to the full frame.

As for the camera, the full-frame one will do. The half-frame Canon recommends the 60D, and the Nikon recommends the D7000 or D7100. Canon's 60D half-frame is the most cost-effective, compared to the 550D, 600D, 650D, and 700D, the 60D viewfinder is a five-sided lens, and the other four are penta-mirrors.

The official standard battery of the 60D is 1800 mAh, and there seems to be a window on it to display ISO and shutter, but the others do not. Of course, the processors of 650D and 700D are 5th generation, and the other 4th generation. But the biggest role of the processor is speed, and speed is reflected in continuous shooting and **.

However, it is not wise for you not to take it to the stadium and shoot ** with a DSLR, so the processor does not make much sense. And 70D is an upgrade of 60D, that is, 18 million pixels are upgraded to 22 million, and the processor is upgraded from the 4th generation to the 5th generation, so it is of little significance, but it is much more expensive. Nikon's, the D90 and the Canon 60D are the same configuration, but the 12 million pixels always feel a little lower, so its upgraded D7000 or D7100 is recommended

You have to go into detail, Canon 60D and Nikon D90 are the two best-selling SLRs, and there is a reason for it, and it is the success of these two machines that Kodak, Fujifilm, Samsung, and Olympus have withdrawn. And on the lens, it is recommended to buy which one is cheaper, because you will find out later that 18-55, 55-250, 17-85, 18-135, 18-105, 18-200 These lenses, whether Nikon or Canon, are just some dog heads, and they can't shoot what you want, far less than the 600 fast 50mm

of prime lenses. The so-called one-shot world means that the zoom range is large, not that the picture quality is good.

Therefore, photography, technology first, lens second, camera third (such as card, mirrorless, SLR and full-frame SLR, its own structure determines that under the condition of large aperture, the same framing, full-frame, half-frame, mirrorless, card machine, reflected in the sharpness and background needs, and these also make the picture cleaner. But these are all the results of the action of the lens, so the effect of the lens is greater than that of the camera).

It is recommended that LZ pay attention to the Olympus e-PL3, which has a fashionable and compact appearance, which is very suitable for girls to sweep the streets. The best thing is its focusing speed and artistic filters, if you like to take pictures, then the E-P3 is definitely the first choice, and the picture effect processed through the filter is also very good.

Canon doesn't have micro-electricity at the moment, Nikon does.

At present, it is still the best choice of Sony, or Panasonic.