Canon, Panasonic, Nikon, which product is good?

Updated on number 2024-02-09
9 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Decisively choose Canon, some people actually say that Sony Panasonic can be compared with Canon, laughing to death, Sony Panasonic directly ruled it out, Sony Panasonic, whether it is a sensor, or a lens is far from being comparable to Canon, Sony Panasonic is coaxing Xiaobai.

    Sony Panasonic is still far from Canon in the field of photography, and Canon is the equivalent of the BMW of the camera world. Laika Hasselblad is the Ferrari Porsche of the camera industry, Sony Panasonic is too secondary, and the money has been spent, no wonder there are huge losses and layoffs every year.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    I'm sorry little brother, there is only one machine at this price, Nikon P300, the appearance of the machine is not very good-looking, but it is definitely a good machine, and the person who buys water should be able to buy it within 1500, the brand is second, and different models of cameras are also different. There is a lot of difference, you can consider this Nikon P300, this machine is positioned as a quasi-professional portable camera, which belongs to the high-end product. As for the requirements you made, a digital camera with a three-million-pixel or less than 500 yuan can do it.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Absolutely Nikon, look at the product or not, just look at the market of SLR. Nikon and Canon are on par, but I personally think Nikon is better. I've been thinking about getting the Nikon D90 lately. Hehe.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    As in my case, I was thinking about a question not too long agoNow I've decided to buy Sony.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    If you're not a professional photographer and just take pictures in general, buy a 5 million pixel one that's enough, automatic, Canon on the line, and you'll get it for a few hundred dollars. If you want to add a little more money to the features, 1000 is enough. After studying, there is a need to buy a "SLR" camera.

  6. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    In fact, it's all about the same, mainly depending on what brand you like. In the case of DSLRs, Canon and Nikon are more mainstream.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    If there are only three brands, Canon, Panasonic, and Nikon, I recommend Canon. But I feel that Samsung's cost performance is good, I recommend Samsung WB700, **1400 yuan, light change 18 times, good.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Which brand is better for digital cameras Sony, Canon, Kodak, Panasonic, Nikon? If you sort from good to second, how can the camera brand only roughly distinguish the grades according to the market share, and the style of each is the difference between the radish and the cabbage, and only the user,

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Canon's Ixus series cameras are preferred for novices!!

Related questions
12 answers2024-02-09

First of all, the brand is the top three in the camera industry, and the quality is assured, and secondly, these three cameras are all cost-effective thousand-yuan digital cameras, and there are many praises from users. You can buy any one. >>>More

1 answers2024-02-09

Hello! When choosing a DSLR digital camera, the first thing is to choose the brand, because the brand determines the update of your accessories and lenses in the future. The brands are naturally Nikon and Canon, and other brands do not need to be considered. >>>More

6 answers2024-02-09

50D has live view, right? Take my current 450D as an example, go to the Settings menu - > Custom - > Live View, and select Quick Mode or Live Mode. This one is really hard to find, and I also found it for a while, and it is far less convenient than Nikon's LV key. >>>More

10 answers2024-02-09

Nikon D40 set of current market ** is 3200 yuan, Tamron 70-300 lens ** 1250 yuan, second-hand may need to discount half price = 3200 + 1250 = 4450 half discount 2200 or so, change Nikon D80 set with 18-135 head now** 6200 or so, 6200 - your 2200 yuan may need to make up the difference of 4000 yuan, so it is not cost-effective to replace the new, it is recommended that you sell second-hand, Then buy a new machine from the new, maybe you can spend less RMBB The above analysis is for reference only and is not used as the basis for the transaction.

6 answers2024-02-09

Both of them are not very good, especially the SX30 changed the AA battery used in the original telephoto series, using a "professional lithium battery", IXUS1000 can only use lithium battery because of the small body, think about it! A few years later, the battery life to the original model of the battery is gone, no matter how good the camera will become a waste, there are two early digital cameras around me because they can't match the battery can only be discarded, during which they are matched with one of them, but it will be finished in less than a year (it can be seen that the quality of the substitute is extremely poor), AA battery (can be replaced by 5 nickel-metal hydride rechargeable battery) is widely used everywhere, I believe that in recent decades or even hundreds of years will not be eliminated, as long as the camera is not broken, the camera with AA battery will continue to be used as long as the camera is not broken.