Close your broken browser and read the answers

9 Young students should not always browse the Internet, but read more books (written by older people). (3 points in total.) This question tests overall perceptual ability.

1 point for answering "close your browser" only; Because it is only a part of the author's point of view, it can be done without reading the full text and just looking at the title. The answer is "Don't always browse the Internet, read more", you can get 2 points; The flaw of this answer is that it doesn't focus on the object of writing. The author specifically states the age of the reporter at the beginning, and mentions secondary school students in several places in the text, which is enough to show that this article is aimed at young students.

"Young students should not always browse the Internet, but read more books" is worth 3 points)10 The incident of "interviews by journalists" in the first paragraph is a reference to the harm of "always browsing on the Internet". The argument in the first paragraph, "I write book reviews," uses his own personal experience to prove his point. (3 points in total.)

2 points for one point and 3 points for two points. 1 point for those who only answer "can enhance persuasiveness". It is important to make it clear how the material serves the point of view, or the connection between the point of view and the material.

The common way of thinking is: the point of view comes from the material, which is the role of the material in the paragraph, and the second is that the material serves the point of view, such as the material "I write a book review" in the paragraph)11 Clearly state one's point of view (1 point); There is a factual or rational basis related to personal experience (1 point). Be clear and persuasive (2 points).

A total of 4 points. This is an open-ended question, but the basic basis is still the text. If you agree, you should make supplementary arguments based on the author's point of view.

If you disagree, you should point out what is unreasonable, and you should have appropriate arguments and arguments. Of course, it can also be analyzed dialectically) Example 1: I agree with the second point.

Because everyone's experience, personality, and aesthetic vision are different, what books to read and what kind of books they like are like eating vegetables, some people love salty, and some people love light. If a person who loves spicy food recommends Chongqing hot pot to a person who can't eat spicy food at all, then even if the hot pot itself is beautiful and distinctive, it is equivalent to saying it in vain to people who don't like spicy food. Zhuangzi said, "You are not me, I don't know the joy of fish", you and I, it is still so difficult to understand each other, let alone a book recommended by others?

Therefore, it is better to choose the "fresh bun" yourself and taste it yourself. Example 2: I disagree with the second part.

I think reading other people's reviews can help you quickly understand what you want to know. On the basis of understanding, if you are not interested, you can not read it, otherwise, you can further investigate. What's more, middle school students have shallow experience and tight learning, and in the face of a lot of knowledge, mixed information, to expand reading, we really need someone to help us carefully select some books.

The appendix of the new curriculum standard for junior high school recommends the required reading list. It doesn't hurt to read the recommended literature, but on the contrary, I have learned about many other famous works through the bibliography. Suffice it to say, the recommended bibliography has broadened my horizons.

Therefore, reading books recommended by trustworthy people is one of the choices for middle school students.