My grandfather didn t have any other documents left, only the title deed to my father

Some of your father's statements show that your grandfather trusts your father, and this is a lawyer's judgment.

There is no documentary evidence of the land that your grandfather gave to your father, but it was only given orally, and now there is no basis for his words, so your uncle also has the right to inherit your grandfather's land, and he can ask for back part of the land that belongs to him.

How many children did your grandpa have? If it's just your father's son, then there's nothing to say, because it's an only son, only he is the only heir, so he should inherit your father's estate, if your father has other children, then you need the owner, if there is no will, then everyone will inherit the inheritance!

If there is no other evidence to support it, this evidence can only indicate that the title deed is for your father to keep it. You can't state the ownership of the house!

It's sure you're going to be paid, and if that's the case, my opinion is that your best is that. Hehe, say that if there is no verbal agreement or something, if you are alone, it will naturally be left to your father, if not, then you and your father are divided equally, and you are welded um, your grandmother.

At that time, the old people lived in poverty, and there was not much inheritance left to the next generation, although the grandfather did not leave any wealth to the descendants, but this title deed is also the grandfather's lifelong hard work and hard work, and it is also worthy of our enough cherishment.

If the son inherits the father's business, if there are no other brothers and sisters, he can go directly to the transfer, if so, he must go to the notarization or divide the family property.

If your grandfather wrote a will, according to the will. There is no will to distribute as per the law.

My grandfather didn't have any other documents left, only the title deed to my father

Nor does this fully prove that the land belongs to your father.

The 1953 title deed is not legally binding. The reasons are as follows: 1. In June 1950, the state promulgated the "Land Reform Law of the People's Republic of China," and Article 1 of the law clearly announced that the land ownership system of feudal exploitation by the landlord class would be abolished and the land ownership system of the peasants should be implemented.

Article 30 of the law clearly stipulates that after the completion of the land reform, the people will issue a land ownership certificate, and the land contract before the reform of the land system will be invalidated. It can be seen that as early as the 50s of the last century, after the completion of China's land reform, all land contracts were abolished. 2. According to the current laws and regulations of our country, land is owned by the State or collectively.

As a result, the private land certificates or title deeds issued after liberation are now invalid and no longer have legal effect.

Moreover, the house that my grandfather left to my father was lost, and my uncle had no way to own it, because he didn't have a letter to pay respect, and my uncle had no legal basis to prove that he owned the house. So, the uncle didn't have a share.

Your uncle, as a child, has the right to inherit all your grandfather's property, and if your grandfather's will is lost, the molecule must have his share.

There is a share. Uncle is a direct child of your grandfather and has the same inheritance rights as your father.

The house that my grandfather left to my father was lost by myself, and my uncle also had a share.