Is advanced education good for students?

It's not good, because advanced education suffers not only from the student's own childhood, but also from the so-called face of the parents; At that time, there will be comparisons, the emergence of various cram schools, and people will be deceived.

Advanced education is not good for the average child and may cause them to be overstressed, but if the child really has this talent, then advanced education can play a progressive role.

I feel that it is not good, because every age of students, his receptivity is certain, and if he is educated in advance, it may be beyond the cognitive range of his age.

First of all, I don't approve of children learning ahead of time. Advanced education in schools is to provide advanced educational content in advance before students reach their due learning ability, aiming to cultivate students' talents and potential. However, school advance education is not without its harms, and here are some of them.

The impact of advanced learning on students.

First, advanced school education can lead to overconfident mindsets in students that do not take into account basic education. When students' self-esteem is satisfied by advanced education, they may neglect to learn the basic learning content that is essential for an adult's basic knowledge and social survival.

Secondly, this kind of education is also prone to highlight the experience of individual students with excellent grades, thus creating psychological barriers for other students. Advanced school education is often aimed at students with high IQs and high grades, leaving behind those who are lagging behind. Students who fail to participate in this avant-garde education are likely to experience frustration from the feeling of not succeeding.

Finally, there is a possibility that advanced school education may bring excessive psychological pressure to students. Some students may experience excessive nervousness and anxiety in their pursuit of success and recognition from their teachers. For students who have to excel under such high pressure, advanced education may be even more burdensome.

In short, although school advanced education can improve students' performance and potential, it should also take into account its potential negative impacts, and should not blindly pursue advanced teaching. Only by allowing each student to receive as much care and attention as possible can we help them reach their full potential. Therefore, for the child's advanced learning behavior, the final result may be counterproductive, the child is just rigid in learning, and does not fundamentally understand the importance of learning to him.

For students with children, I don't think it's appropriate to learn ahead of time.

Because it is most important for children to develop their interests in elementary school. Therefore, many experienced teachers do not approve of the parents' approach, because the impact of advanced education and general education on children is very different.

First, it will affect the learning status of students, because children are still young and lack of self-control, many students under advanced education will have their own "sense of superiority", thinking that they can not listen carefully after learning, and the phenomenon of distraction and slipping in class is not uncommon, and in the end they develop bad study habits, and it is difficult to correct them.

Second, students' energy is limited, if too much energy is put on advanced learning, then it is likely to distract the attention of learning, and because the knowledge and ability do not meet the standards of advanced learning, the process of learning will definitely encounter a lot of difficulties, under the blow will make learning a "chore", and the enthusiasm and enthusiasm for learning will be greatly reduced. The learning status and interest gradually decline, and in the third grade, there will be a big fluctuation in the grades, and there will be a huge gap in the psychology of students, which will lead to a boredom in learning.

Third, many parents will put advanced education in the make-up class, the explanation of knowledge is like "watching the flowers", students simply do not have time to digest, grinding and talking through a large number of exercises to strengthen, students will have a lot of "adaptability" problems, and eventually lose the motivation to learn. The so-called "quick blind closure is not reached", the choice of education methods is very important, step by step is the right way to let students learn a little earlier than others, learn a little more, this psychology is understandable, after all, the "involution" is serious, if one step behind, it is easy to fall behind step by step, and it is necessary to work harder to catch up. However, "speed is not enough", advanced education may bring advantages, but for students physical and mental pressure is relatively large, not all students can withstand it, and the result of promoting seedlings can only be counterproductive.

Compared with advanced education, I prefer to adopt a "step-by-step" approach, so that students can do the right things in the right grade, and the same is true for learning, and it is far better to educate according to the student's situation than to follow the trend. If the student's ability to comprehend and absorb knowledge is relatively strong, the child can be intensively trained, exposed to more extracurricular knowledge or learn courses in advance, as long as it is within the student's ability.

For the vast majority of children, it is certainly not good for hermitage, and it is a good thing to let children learn, but it is not necessarily a good thing to learn ahead of time with wheels. Don't forget that it's important to have a regular pattern of your child's growth. 1.

It is very detrimental for children to develop good study habits in advance. Children have already learned what they have learned in advance, and when they arrive in the school classroom, they may not listen carefully, which will affect the child's learning habits. 2.

Children learn ahead of time and focus more on learning, which is not conducive to the development of good living habits in early childhood, and will have an impact on future living habits. 3.If a child learns ahead of time, it will make the child lose the freshness of the knowledge in the textbook, lose interest in learning, and may even become bored with learning.

4.In early childhood, the development of knowledge is not the first priority. If children are asked to memorize some knowledge that they cannot understand, it is against the law of children's physical and mental development, and it is likely to cause children to lose concentration in learning.

5.Children learn ahead of time, and too much textbook knowledge will make children ignore their own health, which is not conducive to cultivating basic life ability and survival ability. Therefore, in normal times, parents must not let their children learn textbook knowledge in advance.

However, it is perfectly okay for parents to let their children learn some knowledge beyond textbooks in advance, such as reading some healthy and beneficial children's books. Because this is not only conducive to broadening children's knowledge horizons, but also a kind of noisy supplement to textbook knowledge. Parents should note:

First, it is necessary to focus on textbook knowledge. Encourage children to read some extracurricular books on the premise of completing the textbook knowledge. Second, we should pay attention to the appropriate amount and appropriateness.

That is, the extracurricular books read should not be too many or too indiscriminate, and the extracurricular books read should be suitable for children to read. Of course, it is still necessary to let children preview textbook knowledge in advance.

Introduction] Regarding children's advanced learning, it is best for parents not to give their children to do it. Once the child has learned this knowledge in advance, it will be very boring to repeat the mechanical learning.

Parents should provide their children with appropriate education according to the law of their children's development, and don't think about using what is ahead of the school to help their children get good results. Learning ahead of time is bad for your child's body, and your child will not see the classroom as an improvement in concentration.

What parents don't know is that their children's knowledge reserve is the most important, and it will be very scary for children to learn ahead of time, which also makes this issue attract everyone's attention and cause related discussions.

The impact of advanced education on students] 1, the most direct impact of advanced education behavior on students is to increase the learning pressure of students. The pressure on students is very great, and even far exceeds the capacity of many students, making their academic performance worse and worse.

2. Students learn at a uniform pace in accordance with relevant regulations, but the existence of advanced education behavior leads to the dissynchronization of learning content and learning progress of students in different schools and even different classes. This affects the equity of learning, which directly leads to differences in students' learning status.

3. Students are learning in accordance with the relevant regulations and in accordance with the corresponding pace, so that students can have enough time and energy to learn and understand new knowledge, and achieve good learning results. The existence of advanced educational behavior makes the learning pace of students greatly accelerated, which is not conducive to their growth.

Advanced education violates the sequential nature of students' physical and mental development. The development of the human body is a process of continuous development from the low to the high, from the simple to the complex. At the same time, this process is objective and unchangeable, and the chain of mausoleums is based on education that cannot be used to promote the growth of seedlings.

Advance education can easily lead children to form bad learning habits when they enter school. Due to the lack of appropriate materials and scientific methods, some lead delay in advanced education often only focuses on knowledge, and some parents even take pride in the fact that their children can write and calculate before entering school. In this way, at the beginning of elementary school, the content of primary school education is regarded as "pediatrics" that can be "learned without learning", and as a result, I don't care about going to class and not doing my best after class, forming a bad learning attitude and bad study habits.

Advanced education only focuses on the inculcation of knowledge, and ignores the cultivation of ability and interest, which is easy to make children's learning lack of sustainable stamina after entering school.

Therefore, a senior early childhood education expert pointed out that it is the main task of children to enter preschool education to develop a good study habits, self-care ability, tenacious will, good psychological endurance and a high sense of responsibility.

Personally, I think there are pros and cons to early education. On the one hand, the advantage is that after advanced education, children may know a little more than children of the same age, can memorize Tang poems, can write, can sing, etc., which will play a certain role in helping children go to school. As for its drawbacks, advanced education may hinder children's lively nature and creativity.

For example, when educating children with the symbol "0", you can educate with objects similar to the shape of "0" such as "Sun Huaikai", "Moon", "Egg" or "Mother's Eyes Wide", if the education method of primary school students freezes it as the number "0" or the English letter "O", once we fix the meaning, on the surface, it seems that the cognitive level of children has been raised to a higher level, but in fact, the creation and development of children's thinking on the symbol of "0" have been stifled by our adults. There is no development. In the long run, compared with children of the same age, their ability to innovate, imagine and develop will be correspondingly weakened.

For example, my friend's three-year-old child, I once taught her to memorize Tang poems, "Leaving the grass on the plain, one year old and one withering", and several other poems, and then once I gave her a pear and told her that it was a "pear pear", and she suddenly said: "Auntie, this is the 'detachment' in 'leaving the grass on the plain'." I couldn't laugh or cry, and later I explained it to her in detail, but she finally stubbornly thought that this "separation" was the other "pear pear".

It can be seen from this that the child's memory and imitation are very strong, even if she can memorize a few Tang poems, or imitate simple words, it can't explain anything, because the child does not understand from the real meaning of words or sentences, so she decided not to teach her anymore.