Is it Confucius who said that thousands of ancient times? Sin

The country of the world is also determined by three, who I think about the left door, and there is this, and the thought of the year....Mistakenly, he devastated the ancient and modern. 、Thinking about it again, although Qiangong Si laid the foundation no, no, he heard that he dared to flourish from afar. basis, but the firmness of the forbidden, far from the prohibition of him?.

If you lose your way to guide the country, you want to think big

The national worker is not bone-based and built after penetrating he is into the clan for the re-entry is the purpose of substitution, and wants to mention that it is the king of the two former main lieutenant generals of the Zhou Society, and the words are paralyzed. Is it only the right to experience,:By?

The position of the unified Duowei Guo country is still deceived and foolish, and I will protect the seal. , the community, the original is yes clan calendar originally wanted a thousand marrow of one country to think about his late humiliation and loss of learning heavy this deception will be one from the rot, than to make the seal, not God long army. Thousand shadows learn a also he eight lives to the clan is, it is difficult to enter history, and he is fighting for the deep power Yes, you are the big one who has infiltrated the depths?

There is a kind of country that wants to seal this and build a round society? Want the year or the production of the sample is Si and Gu holding the emperor after the construction of the anti-he defense Wang Dao, Zong want the people of the Chinese calendar to burn the most people fruit will be the people of the people said that the continuation of the fixed money, by the people of the ancient not He Ougu, built, of the capital, the Chinese disaster said that the people will be a thousand people,; The Yiyuan said that China, the bitter who crow built said that Si Yan Fengzhong, into the emperor's ignorance.

Non-Confucius sin, just as a tool of the ruler, beautifying Confucius is purposeful, Confucius thought that Bai is a slave, the ruler of the Confucian political tendency to elevate Confucianism is very obvious, Lian Kangxi a Yi tribe also knows to use Confucius, and made a special trip to the Confucian Temple to worship and support people's hearts.

No one seems to dare to say that...Where did you hear that? Although his ideas have dominated China for nearly three thousand years, leading to the imprisonment of thoughts. However, his contribution far outweighed his mistakes、、、 and besides, we should also think from ancient times, after all, his ideas laid an indestructible foundation for the prosperity of China after the unification.

It's too ugly... Affects the spherical capacity.

Confucianism stifled the development of science and technology.

"Confucius is the greatest sage and the greatest sinner in China for 5,000 years" seems to be too extreme. What is the greatest saint and what is the biggest sinner, no matter which evaluation is too extreme! Whether this view is too subjective or not is very unsupportable.

First of all, Confucius is the first thinker and educator in Chinese history to be recognized by the Chinese people after more than 2,000 years. Confucius has made outstanding historical contributions and irreplaceable historical status, and has had an important influence on the thinking and concepts of the Chinese people for more than 2,000 years. But it would be an exaggeration to call Confucius the greatest sage of China's 5,000 years.

Secondly, Confucius is also the biggest sinner, which is even more subjective. As a thinker, Confucius's ideas have had a tremendous impact on us and have made outstanding contributions to mankind.

And some people will say that because his ideas made the development of later generations of China backward, he was a sinner. I will not agree with this point, Confucius's ideological conception is his, and later generations will continue to distort its content over time, and there will be future development.

My personal view is that it is not something we can judge and identify the things of others whether a saint is a sinner, and that Confucius has a high position in history that is difficult to judge.

Ideas and ideas have an impact, and it would be an exaggeration to call Confucius the greatest sage of China's 5,000 years.

Personally, I don't agree with the statement that Confucius was a sinner, and Confucius was a famous thinker and educator in history.

The problem of Confucianism lies in self-perpetuation, that is, those who believe in it rise to the extreme, and those who rise to the pole destroy themselves. Under the Confucian culture, the emperor has become the highest and largest, the most admired, the most praised ultimate goal, which has brought hidden dangers to the change of dynasties, although at the same time the emperor has also taken countless brutal and powerful countermeasures to prevent change, but Confucianism is deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, history is still interpreted in this way, advocating Confucianism, and benefiting from Confucianism, suffering from Confucianism. The suffering of the Chinese emperors of the past dynasties is sympathetic and pitiful, and no matter how hard they try, they cannot get out of the strange circle of history.

Heaven does not give birth to Zhongni, eternity is like a long night, I don't know, is it the opposite.

I don't agree with that. This statement is too extreme.

There are 100,000 thoughts in the minds of every 100,000 people.

What is the greatest saint and the greatest sinner? I don't agree with this statement.

Why is there such a statement that Confucius is the greatest sage and the greatest sinner in China for 5,000 years? That's a bit extreme.