Li Yongle reviewed the doubts of Chen Wendeng throughout the book

Li's book is not messy I used Li's last year, but I also have Chen's in my hand, and I was going to use it later, but due to the tight time, I turned it over and found that it was really biased, and the skill was too strong, and it was already in the late stage of review, and it was too late to be too skillful, so I gave up, and picked a few pages of the topic that I didn't quite grasp well and looked at it.

Lee's train of thought is roughly:

First of all, the nature of the concept, etc., interspersed with a few example problems can be regarded as to help the initial understanding, but it is not very comprehensive, because this part is mainly a string of concepts. In the following part, "Common Exam Question Types and Their Disintegration Methods and Techniques", we will go into detail through specific topics. So you'll find some similarities before and after.

Then there are the exercises.

I wanted to use Chen at first, but I dizzy after looking at the limit part twice, I can't, it's not easy to understand, I feel that I have to be very clear about the concept and conclusion, and it's really technical. It is recommended that you read it from Lee's book, but it depends on personal preferences. Both books sold well, and both of my classmates were useful, and they weren't too bad.

You can do the extreme part of doing Chen and Li to try it out and then make a decision.

Good luck! Supplement: Chen's summary of knowledge points is very good, I feel that it is more suitable for the later comprehensive consolidation period, because it is not only the concept and nature, but also many conclusions are directly given, and at first glance I don't know how it was launched.

Some of Lee's books are given in the example problem analysis.

See for yourself, my feelings.

Chen's book is more technical, and Li's is more basic.

This is how your foundation goes.

To be honest, I also think Li Yongle's book is a bit messy, and I used Chen Wendeng's exercises at the beginning, which is really difficult! But it's good to do it, and then I bought a review of the whole book, and I think his book is really good.

You can read Chen Wendeng's review book, if you find it difficult, look at the answers, and read the book, the questions and the solution first. Then do it all over again.

In fact, if it is used well, it is better than Chen Wendeng.

Isn't it good to be high on yourself?!

That's how I deal with it, I signed up for the math tutorial class, which was taught by the teacher at the school, and it was finished before the end of the summer vacation, and the time saved was to review by myself, and finally it was over by doing the real questions for the next ten years, I don't think there was any need to read and review the whole book by myself, first of all, it was more laborious to find a teacher to teach, so that you could leave most of the time to review, and it would be too difficult to read it yourself.

Review the whole book: I personally recommend that students who do not have a good grasp of high mathematics (those with bad skills) use Li Yongle's review book, and you can take a look at Chen Wendeng's review guide when you have eaten Li Yongle's review book thoroughly; Students who have a good grasp of high mathematics (good skills) use Chen Wendeng's review guide.

Li Yongle's review of the whole book: the book focuses on the foundation and concepts, very sticky to the real questions, some people may say that his concepts are too much, and relatively simple, but the postgraduate entrance examination is not a competition, it is a certain amount of calculation and thinking in the specified time, to examine the calculation ability and thinking ability, from the past years, it can be seen that mathematics is not very difficult, but the high score is more difficult to test, because few people seriously and carefully reason to prove the concept, and there are many people who are not familiar with the theorem, here it reflects the role of Li Yongle's review of the whole bookIt contains a certain amount of calculation and basic concepts, which is very suitable for students who do not have a good grasp of high mathematics (those with poor skills);

Chen Wendeng's review guide: The book focuses on methods and skills, the book is also known as the authority of mathematics, but with the passage of time and the change of the focus of the graduate school entrance examination, the status of this book has been reduced, but many of the proofs in the book such as: the proof of the median value theorem, the proof of inequality, and Chen's differential operator method that has been criticized by many people (I like the method very much, and it is not beyond the outline) can be said to be a master of higher mathematics, and he himself is also a master of mathematics.

Can someone in the know tell us about the idea of Li Yongle's book?

How do you define it??? Sales?? Then Li Yongle's is the most used every year, because this book is very basic, and the postgraduate entrance examination is not an Olympiad math, but also pays attention to the basics.

There are Li Yongle around me, Chen Wendeng, 135 or above, and a few tens. So I feel that it's not a problem with the book. However, the probability of Chen's book is not very good with the line generation.

My classmates basically use Li Yongle's.

It can only be said that these two books have their own merits, and it is recommended to choose different books as reference materials according to the different foundations of each person.

Li Yongle's book is generally more basic, which can help you better understand the knowledge points required in the syllabus; Chen Wendeng's book is more technical, mainly aimed at off-topic and difficult problems.

As far as my personal experience in the postgraduate entrance examination is concerned, I recommend choosing Li Yongle's review book, which is closely related to the textbook and strengthens the consolidation of basic knowledge. In addition, Li Yongle has a complete set of review books for the postgraduate entrance examination, including the foundation 660, the past questions of the postgraduate entrance examination, the postgraduate entrance examination sprint 135, etc., as long as you carefully understand these books, there should be no problem with the postgraduate entrance examination mathematics (it is worth mentioning that if you think it is too difficult to take the postgraduate entrance examination 135, you can give up and get the foundation thoroughly), I used all Li Yongle's review materials when I was admitted to graduate school, and finally scored 133 points in mathematics (10 years), and I personally feel good!

Finally, in fact, it is not difficult to take the postgraduate entrance examination, as long as you put your heart and time and energy into it, there will be no problem in the postgraduate examination, I wish you success!

Both of these books are good, it depends on your math level. Chen Wendeng's book is very difficult, there are many solutions and even involve the knowledge of mathematical analysis, you can't understand the solution if you have a general level of mathematics, of course, if you have a high level, it is good to use Chen Wendeng's book to pull it up. Li Yongle's book is just the right difficulty, and everyone basically uses this book.

You can think for yourself Anyway, my classmates didn't see anyone who used Chen Wendeng, and all of them used Li Yongle's.