Class leftovers are overweight and the scholarship selection is cancelled, what is the student s obj

The students have no objection to this rule, and the students are very supportive of it.

As a student, you should respond to the call of the school and carry outDisc action, save food。But due to some personal behaviorIt is still not reasonable to be punished collectivelyIt is hoped that the school can introduce more effective management methods.

Students should have no opinion on this, in fact, this is a practice to prohibit extravagance and waste, which is very worthy of advocating, then the students themselves should learn the spirit of saving food, so they should support it.

The students thought that this rule was too heavy and too formalistic, so they complained a lot about it.

No matter which school it is, there will be a scholarship, the scholarship is to reward those students who are moral, intellectual, good and excellent, this kind of child has good moral character, and their own grades are relatively good, and they deserve to be rewarded and rewarded, but in a middle school in Leiyang, Hunan, the school will classify according to the class, and then weigh their leftovers, if the average leftovers per person in the class per day exceed 100 grams, the student's selection of scholarship qualifications will be cancelled, at the same time. If the waste is severe, the penalty will be deducted. This initiative also makes many people feel a bit harsh, not because of the problem of leftovers, but because of the problem of leftovers and the link between scholarships.

It's obviously two unrelated things, but they have to be forced together.

Actually, I don't think there is a problem with such a move, but it is actually a little unreasonable to link it with the scholarship, but it is understandable that the original intention of this matter is right, because in my opinion, if it is a student with good character, he will not go to the leftovers, which can also be used as a measure. The only unreasonable thing is that if personal leftovers are involved in the evaluation of class scholarships, it is unfair to many students who do not have leftovers. But that's only theoretical, because if the whole class is implicated, there will certainly be no one exception.

And time has proved to us that this initiative is actually very effective, the problem of annual leftovers in the canteen has been solved, and the CD-ROM operation has been successfully implemented in this school.

A while ago, CCTV criticized the so-called fake eating of those big stomachs, and also advocated the CD action and refused to waste food. I think every industry can be different and create some new initiatives to achieve the CD-ROM initiative. It has been a long time since the CD-ROM campaign was implemented, but the results have not been very good, which requires us to think positively about how to achieve the best results.

Scholarships and leftovers. Linking them together is actually a new initiative, and it is also a positive initiative, and the response is also very good. <>

The emergence of such a thing as "class leftovers and overweight cancellation scholarship selection" is actually a problem that each of us supports in our hearts, because such a thing, in fact, there is no problem when we see it at the beginning, but in fact, there are certain drawbacks to such a thing, for the class, it is carried out according to a certain standard of leftovers, and here, it should also be valued by many people in the class group, after all, for such a practice, If you have a series of unsupportive people, isn't that a sign of irresponsibility to other people? <>

With now, the problem of wasting food has appeared around us, and for such a problem, we should also pay attention to it, because for such regulations, although it solves a series of food waste problems, it is not completely stopped, but it will also provide a series of impacts on some people who want to get scholarships. Saving food is something that each of us should do, but for such a problem, it should be subject to certain rectification measures, after all, there are a series of drawbacks in such behavior, and only by correcting it better can we ensure that everyone has a series of fair treatment, isn't it? Although such a provision is said to be based on certain good things, if it is in some bad thoughts, then such a practice also presents a series of unfairness.

The problem of wasting food is becoming more and more serious in our current situation, and it is also a topic that we pay attention to to solve the problem of food waste, but in this case, we should also consider a series of consequences, after all, only by considering the real and reasonable way is to give people a correct way. Although it is possible to take appropriate corrective measures on the basis of scholarship as a certain coercive basis, it must be carried out in a supportive attitude, otherwise it is likely to backfire. <>

Class leftovers and overweight canceled the scholarship selection, and I personally think that the school's regulations are reasonable. Because as our living conditions are getting better and better, many people are not aware of the hard-won good life now, so they do not cherish food. Because everyone is not aware of the preciousness of food.

So that is, no one to cherish. Recently, for the selection of scholarships for a school class with overweight leftovers, in fact, in the final analysis, it is also so that students can learn to cherish food, not to trample on it, but to cherish it, because food is also growing little by little, and it is also very hard-won. <>

Therefore, we should pay more attention to it, for food, we must have memorized such a poem when we were children, that is, who knows that the Chinese food on the plate is hard. This in itself is also used to describe the difficulty and hardship of the farmer's uncle to grow food, so it is also more necessary for us to cherish, we cherish the grain at the same time, but also to respect the fruits of the farmer's uncle's labor. Because food is hard-won, we need to cherish it, because now many poor mountainous areas are also unable to eat, so we are now living in such good conditions, but we must cherish it, and we must be grateful for everything we have now.

Therefore, personally, I think that such a regulation for this school is very reasonable, because I also hope that students can cherish food and not waste it, because food is not hard to come by, not out of thin air. Therefore, we must cherish it, and think that there are still many people who can't eat, so we should cherish these grains. <>

Therefore, to sum up, I personally think that the school's regulations are reasonable for the selection of scholarships for a school with leftover food and overweight.

I think it's reasonable, wasting food is a bad behavior in itself, and I want to be good at scholarship study and moral character.

Plausible. Leftovers are overweight and an indication that the class is not in good shape, and the cancellation of the scholarship can serve as a warning to the students in the class and push them to do better.

This may be reasonable, as there is a lot of waste. It should be strictly managed and let everyone know to cherish it, so that it is a good child.

I don't think it's reasonable. Because I think there is a bit of a coercive measure in this way, and our education itself is to guide people to go and think in this way.

In fact, it is not so much that the "class leftovers are overweight and the scholarship selection is canceled" is controversial, but rather that the scholarship is controversial, after all, the scholarship is still a lot of money for students, whether it is in junior high school, high school, college, the selection of scholarships has always existed in various controversies.

In the end, it can only be said that the scholarship is only a part, and it is more important to improve yourself in school!

Because this provision is a bit nitpicky and one-size-fits-all.

Linking the weight of leftovers to the scholarship, it's hard not to wonder if this is done by someone with a heart, or if there are other tricks?

And because there is no quantitative standard, this kind of thing can easily be opportunistic by others, resulting in unfair events.

The school's intentions are good, and I hope that students will not waste food, but I think it should be included in the scholarship selection and not directly canceled because the leftovers are overweight.

Because everyone has a different concept, most people feel that the scholarship is directly linked to the grades, and if the leftovers are added, it should be considered at the same time.

Because some people think that this condition is too harsh, and that the leftovers have nothing to do with the scholarship itself, the mixed reviews make this controversial very controversial.

Because the scholarship is a reward for outstanding people, it needs to be comprehensively evaluated, and it is too one-sided to evaluate whether a person is eligible for a scholarship just because of leftovers.

Because the leftovers are overweight, the price to be paid is actually very large, and the class is a whole and cannot be involved in personal interests.

Class leftovers overweight cancellation scholarship selection" For the introduction of such a regulation, it has also been supported by many netizens, because for now, many of them have a series of problems such as wasting food, "who knows that the food on the plate, the grains are hard" I believe that such a problem, many people know it, but for such a problem, have you really carried it out? And such a provision is the use of scholarship as a reason to carry out a series of food saving practices, in fact, such a practice, should also be respected by us, with a certain punishment to be able to make them realize that this kind of thing should not happen, in order to have a certain coercive effect, only in this way can the problem of saving food really appear in our daily life. <>

Because with us now, there are a series of waste of food problems in many places, and many people in some workplaces will choose a certain amount of waste of food for a certain face, and in the case of not being able to eat it, a series of comparison waste, in fact, such a problem is actually a problem that we should pay attention to, because we all know that in the case of wasting food, many people are forced to end their lives because they can't eat food. In fact, under these circumstances, we should also pay attention to a series of things, and for such regulations, we should also get our support, after all, for such a problem, it is also a series of regulations that appear in order to maintain a good social environment. <>

In fact, around us, we should also save food, after all, for them, there are many people who starve to death because they can't eat, and we can have such conditions, we should save on a certain basis, only in this way can we make our lives better. We should really save food, everyone is responsible, only in this way can a truly good citizen practice. <>

My personal opinion on this matter is this, waste is shameful, so avoid waste, there is such a rule, it is quite good. The main thing is to raise everyone's awareness and make yourself not waste food. At the same time, let others take warning.

The reason for canceling the scholarship selection is to promote students to save food, and I think the original intention of this practice is very good, but the punishment is a bit too heavy!

I think this is a good division. Let students know that every grain is hard work, and that food cannot be wasted.

This doesn't make sense, after all, everyone has an occasional time when they feel unwell and can't eat. It would be too much to abolish the right to select scholarships.

In my opinion, this should be praised, because saving food is a traditional virtue, and we all know that every grain is hard, and waste is shameful, and it should be grabbed from the students.

I think this is quite reasonable, because in addition to studying well, students who get scholarships also need to keep up with their morals.

To sum up, this is why I am very much in favor of implementing such a policy, that is, because today's children are too troublemaker, and their waste of food is very serious, so it is necessary to implement a certain method to discipline them.

Very supportive of this regulation of the school. Let students develop the habit of eating as much as they want, and save hard-won food. The students also agreed with this approach, eating as much as they wanted each time, so as not to waste food.

This regulation is very effective, and can cultivate students' awareness of thrift and cherishing food.

Pretty good. Because everyone attaches great importance to the scholarship, they will try to eat as much food as possible so that it is not wasted.

The effect of this regulation is still very good, and the phenomenon of students wasting food has been reduced a lot.

"In fact, for such a problem, it should also be supported by us, because for the present, the problem of food waste has appeared around us, and if we are thrifty, we need to carry out a certain education, and it seems that such a method is possible, but it must be carried out with collective consent, after all, they are carried out according to a class, if there is really a certain disagreement, In fact, more often than not, it is also an unfair operation for them, and it should actually depend on the individual in this way. In fact, a series of regulations should be made in the evaluation of individuals, after all, such a method is a reasonable behavior operation, because for such a case, it is a truly fair time. Each student can carry out certain standardized management according to their own needs, and for the issue of scholarships, some people who need scholarships will be asked to provide a series of standardized rectification problems.

Around us, the problem of wasting food also appears around us, and for such a problem to solve It has become a top priority for people now, after all, for the present, although we are going farther and farther on the road of comparing waste, there are still some people who are starving to death because they can't eat. <>

Many times we all know these truths, but for their own behavior, there is no certain norm, many people in the workplace are choosing to go farther and farther on the road of a certain comparison and waste, regardless of whether they can eat it or not, but there must always be face, but also because of such a thought, but also make the current waste problem gradually appear around us, in fact, for such a problem, or should be paid attention to by our series. <>