-
Class leftovers overweight cancellation scholarship selection" For the introduction of such a regulation, it has also been supported by many netizens, because for now, many of them have a series of problems such as wasting food, "who knows that the food on the plate, the grains are hard" I believe that such a problem, many people know it, but for such a problem, have you really carried it out? And such a provision is the use of scholarship as a reason to carry out a series of food saving practices, in fact, such a practice, should also be respected by us, with a certain punishment to be able to make them realize that this kind of thing should not happen, in order to have a certain coercive effect, only in this way can the problem of saving food really appear in our daily life. <>
Because with us now, there are a series of waste of food problems in many places, and many people in some workplaces will choose a certain amount of waste of food for a certain face, and in the case of not being able to eat it, a series of comparison waste, in fact, such a problem is actually a problem that we should pay attention to, because we all know that in the case of wasting food, many people are forced to end their lives because they can't eat food. In fact, under these circumstances, we should also pay attention to a series of things, and for such regulations, we should also get our support, after all, for such a problem, it is also a series of regulations that appear in order to maintain a good social environment. <>
In fact, around us, we should also save food, after all, for them, there are many people who starve to death because they can't eat, and we can have such conditions, we should save on a certain basis, only in this way can we make our lives better. We should really save food, everyone is responsible, only in this way can a truly good citizen practice. <>
-
My personal opinion on this matter is this, waste is shameful, so avoid waste, there is such a rule, it is quite good. The main thing is to raise everyone's awareness and make yourself not waste food. At the same time, let others take warning.
-
The reason for canceling the scholarship selection is to promote students to save food, and I think the original intention of this practice is very good, but the punishment is a bit too heavy!
-
I think this is a good division. Let students know that every grain is hard work, and that food cannot be wasted.
-
This doesn't make sense, after all, everyone has an occasional time when they feel unwell and can't eat. It would be too much to abolish the right to select scholarships.
-
In my opinion, this should be praised, because saving food is a traditional virtue, and we all know that every grain is hard, and waste is shameful, and it should be grabbed from the students.
-
I think this is quite reasonable, because in addition to studying well, students who get scholarships also need to keep up with their morals.
-
To sum up, this is why I am very much in favor of implementing such a policy, that is, because today's children are too troublemaker, and their waste of food is very serious, so it is necessary to implement a certain method to discipline them.
-
Very supportive of this regulation of the school. Let students develop the habit of eating as much as they want, and save hard-won food. The students also agreed with this approach, eating as much as they wanted each time, so as not to waste food.
-
This regulation is very effective, and can cultivate students' awareness of thrift and cherishing food.
-
Pretty good. Because everyone attaches great importance to the scholarship, they will try to eat as much food as possible so that it is not wasted.
-
The effect of this regulation is still very good, and the phenomenon of students wasting food has been reduced a lot.
-
In fact, it is not so much that the "class leftovers are overweight and the scholarship selection is canceled" is controversial, but rather that the scholarship is controversial, after all, the scholarship is still a lot of money for students, whether it is in junior high school, high school, college, the selection of scholarships has always existed in various controversies.
In the end, it can only be said that the scholarship is only a part, and it is more important to improve yourself in school!
-
Because this provision is a bit nitpicky and one-size-fits-all.
Linking the weight of leftovers to the scholarship, it's hard not to wonder if this is done by someone with a heart, or if there are other tricks?
And because there is no quantitative standard, this kind of thing can easily be opportunistic by others, resulting in unfair events.
-
The school's intentions are good, and I hope that students will not waste food, but I think it should be included in the scholarship selection and not directly canceled because the leftovers are overweight.
-
Because everyone has a different concept, most people feel that the scholarship is directly linked to the grades, and if the leftovers are added, it should be considered at the same time.
-
Because some people think that this condition is too harsh, and that the leftovers have nothing to do with the scholarship itself, the mixed reviews make this controversial very controversial.
-
Because the scholarship is a reward for outstanding people, it needs to be comprehensively evaluated, and it is too one-sided to evaluate whether a person is eligible for a scholarship just because of leftovers.
-
Because the leftovers are overweight, the price to be paid is actually very large, and the class is a whole and cannot be involved in personal interests.
-
"In fact, for such a problem, it should also be supported by us, because for the present, the problem of food waste has appeared around us, and if we are thrifty, we need to carry out a certain education, and it seems that such a method is possible, but it must be carried out with collective consent, after all, they are carried out according to a class, if there is really a certain disagreement, In fact, more often than not, it is also an unfair operation for them, and it should actually depend on the individual in this way. In fact, a series of regulations should be made in the evaluation of individuals, after all, such a method is a reasonable behavior operation, because for such a case, it is a truly fair time. Each student can carry out certain standardized management according to their own needs, and for the issue of scholarships, some people who need scholarships will be asked to provide a series of standardized rectification problems.
Around us, the problem of wasting food also appears around us, and for such a problem to solve It has become a top priority for people now, after all, for the present, although we are going farther and farther on the road of comparing waste, there are still some people who are starving to death because they can't eat. <>
Many times we all know these truths, but for their own behavior, there is no certain norm, many people in the workplace are choosing to go farther and farther on the road of a certain comparison and waste, regardless of whether they can eat it or not, but there must always be face, but also because of such a thought, but also make the current waste problem gradually appear around us, in fact, for such a problem, or should be paid attention to by our series. <>
-
Desirablely, the award of scholarships should not only be based on grades, but also on moral character.
-
I think it's desirable that students learn to cherish food and understand the importance of food.
-
No. Because I think this kind of education has a little bit of rationality, I don't think it's advisable.
-
3. The serious leftovers in the class cannot punish the whole class, but the need to punish individuals in a targeted manner lacks a certain degree of rationality in determining whether to punish or not through the form of the whole class. There are so many students in a class that it doesn't make sense to not be able to award a scholarship for an entire class just because a few students are wasting food.
Therefore, I personally think that this practice of the school is really unnecessary. What do you think?
-
I don't think it's necessary, it shouldn't be a class because of some people's problems, wouldn't it be unfair to other children who don't have leftovers.
-
It is necessary. A wisp of perseverance is difficult; Diligence and thrift are virtues, and the main factor in the evaluation of scholarships is learning, but this should be based on the premise of following traditional virtues.
-
I think it is necessary to make children realize the importance of cherishing food and improve their literacy.
-
Therefore, to sum up, I personally think that this kind of regulation is worth promoting for the selection of class leftovers and overweight cancellation scholarships.
-
It's worth promoting. It can make students more passionate about food and make food less and less wasted.
-
It is worth promoting, once the problem of food waste is raised, it has aroused heated discussions, and it is worth advocating in order to cultivate a good habit of cherishing food from students.
-
Not worth promoting. Because I think it's important to save food, but I don't think it's reasonable.
-
I think it's worth it, because it allows children to learn to cherish food and develop the habit of saving.
I think this is worthy of respect, a man who is willing to give up his career for the sake of his family is worthy of admiration, you must know that men are more likely to be looked down upon than women as family cooks, so they are even more worthy of admiration.
My view of intermediaries is that the intermediary industry is a service industry, and you have to have professional services. The other is a team, you have to have team spirit, be able to endure hardships, and be willing to challenge.
My ex is okay, and I'm okay with it.
In fact, for the matter of looking at Internet celebrities going to act. Acting focuses on watching the play played by the actors and the acting skills of the actors. Internet celebrities go to acting, but if Internet celebrities have acting skills, we should not reject this matter. >>>More
Counseling is also accepting, different from understanding, psychologists maintain neutrality in counseling, provide a non-judgmental attitude, accept the reasons behind your behavior, and at the same time express respect for everyone, see the power of each person, believe that everyone has the possibility of change, and have their own unique resources and wisdom.