What is the difference between an eyewitness and a bystander? Bystander eyewitness relationships

An eyewitness is a person who has witnessed the whole process and knows the truth, while a bystander doesn't care about the truth of the facts, just a person watching the excitement.

A bystander is a pseudo-person who stands by and watches the scene of an incident, and many of them may have been watching the pseudo-person out of curiosity after the incident.

The striker, on the other hand, refers to seeing with his own eyes how the incident happened, so the eyewitness can better understand what the truth of the incident is. Therefore, most of the bystanders are the people who eat melons, and the witnesses are the real witnesses.

Witnesses see it with their own eyes, and bystanders feel that they don't care about themselves.

The difference between witnesses and bystanders is actually that the reporter knows the evidence in the cloud curtain, but the bystander is just a superficial thing, and the difference between the two is a guiding thing. One doesn't know.

The former is to see the whole process of the event with his own eyes, and the bystander is the person who is on the sidelines, which is relative to the person who has experienced it personally. Sometimes they can use each other, and sometimes their frames of reference are different.

The difference between an eyewitness and a bystander, an eyewitness and a bystander, I don't think there's much difference, it's all about seeing the process of the event happening.

Witnesses should be real and effective, seeing the whole process.

The bystander simply says that he has seen the process or part of it when it happens.

Witnesses and bystanders, their meanings are similar, and witnesses may have come across by accident.

Eyewitnesses are precisely direct eyewitnesses to a time, while bystanders are later bystanders, and they have the most direct difference.

If they see something with their own eyes or um, a bystander, he says he didn't see it, it may be that they are afraid of some pressure in their hearts.

1.This phenomenon is likely to be as follows: 2The first is that the pump has not been used for a long time, and the inside of the pump head is rusty, and the water page is stuck, which causes it to not start after powering on, and can only buzz.

3.The second is that the starting capacitance of the water pump is attenuated very badly and cannot achieve the effect of starting. 4.

The first reason is to find a way to get rid of the rust inside and it can rotate normally.

Summary. Both bystanders and witnesses refer to people who observed the event as it happened, but they have slightly different meanings.

Both bystanders and witnesses refer to people who observed the event as it happened, but they have slightly different meanings.

You've done a great job! Can you elaborate on that?

A bystander usually refers to a person who stands on the periphery of an event and is not directly involved in the event, but only observes to understand the occurrence and progress of the event. For example, in a Mingsen traffic accident, both pedestrians and drivers on the side of the road can be referred to as bystanders. Eyewitnesses put more emphasis on their personal experiences and testimonies of the event.

An eyewitness is a person who directly witnessed the event as it happened, and they can provide a more specific, detailed description and testimony of the event. For example, in a bank robbery, both employees and customers inside the bank can be called eyewitnesses because they saw the robber's actions firsthand. Therefore, the relationship between the bystander and the witness is that the eyewitness is a kind of bystander, but the bystander is not necessarily an eyewitness.

Both concepts are very important in law and in court trials, because eyewitness testimony is often one of the important pieces of evidence to determine the facts and truth of a case.

Perpetrators and bystanders are not the same, but there are a few reasons why bystanders can also be considered abusers:

1.Knew but didn't call the police.

When bystanders witness violence happening, but they choose not to call the police or take any action to help, it is clear that such actions cause additional harm to the victims. Bystanders should take action to protect and help the victim, such as calling the police or contacting other people for help. If bystanders choose not to take any action, then they become acquiesced and indirectly support the violence, so they can be considered one of the perpetrators.

2.Passive involvement.

Bystanders may get involved by ** or commenting on the violent stool incident. This passive involvement may increase the confidence and motivation of the perpetrator, which can exacerbate the violence. Perpetrators of violence should not provide encouragement or support, but should instead discourage and discourage violence.

If bystanders participate by directly or indirectly supporting the violence, then they are one of the perpetrators.

3.Ignore and ignore.

If bystanders choose to ignore and ignore the violence and do not provide any form of help or assistance, then they bear some responsibility for the violence. Bystanders should take action to help the victim and prevent the violence from happening again. If bystanders do nothing to stop the violence, then they are considered to have indirectly supported the perpetrator's behavior and can therefore be considered one of the perpetrators.

In conclusion, the role of bystanders in violence is not the same, and some bystanders may have a responsibility to help the victim and stop the violence, or if they do not take any action, they will be held responsible.