A son and a daughter to whom the parents are raised, and who supports the parents of a son and a dau

I don't think parents give birth to their sons and daughters so that they can support them in the future, but since ancient times, when parents are old, it is incumbent on children to honor them, even if they don't give you a rich life, but at least you don't have missing arms and legs, so should you repay your parents? So we shouldn't argue about who raises it, if you have the money to contribute, you have the power to contribute, and your parents are your own, not someone else's, do you say that you don't have to raise it, then you won't raise it? To be a man is to be based on conscience, no one's heart is made of ice!!

You all have to raise it. If it is more convenient for the son to take care of his parents, he can take the income of his parents and then take care of his parents, but the daughter cannot ignore his parents because of this, and must care and take care of his parents when he has time and energy. Of course, the son should take on more of the part.

In any case, both sons and daughters should do their best to support their parents, because it is not easy for them to pull you apart. To be a man, you must know how to repay your kindness.

If that's the case, the daughter doesn't have to take alimony, but the daughter must be filial, she can often visit her parents, and she can also give them some money from time to time according to her own wishes.

If you have a son and a daughter of your own, and you want your children to be, then you should do it now, as long as you have a clear conscience.

Legal Analysis: Legally, children have the obligation to support their parents.

Legal basis: Article 1074 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Grandparents who can afford it have the obligation to support their minor grandchildren whose parents have died or whose parents are unable to support them. Grandchildren who can afford it have the obligation to support their grandparents who have died or whose children are unable to support them.

Article 23 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of the Rights and Interests of the Elderly: The elderly and their spouses have the obligation to support each other. Where a younger brother or sister who is supported by an older brother or sister becomes an adult and has the ability to afford it, he or she has an obligation to support the elder brother or sister who is old and has no support.

Summary. Hello <>

The property of the parents, in the absence of a will, should be divided equally among all the children. Therefore, not all property should go to the son. According to the Inheritance Law of the People's Republic of China, the estate shall be distributed according to the wishes of the deceased or in accordance with the statutory provisions.

If the decedent did not leave a will and did not reach an agreement, the estate should be divided equally among all the children. However, in practice, it is also necessary to take into account whether there are special circumstances, such as children with disabilities, inability to live, etc., and appropriate adjustments can be made.

Do parents have a son and a daughter, and all property belongs to their sons?

Hello <>

The property of the parents, in the absence of a will, should be divided equally among all the children. Therefore, not all property should go to the son. According to China's "Inheritance Law", the estate shall be distributed according to the wishes of the deceased or in accordance with the statutory provisions.

If the decedent did not leave a will and did not reach an agreement, the estate should be divided equally among the children who had been deceased. However, in practice, it is also necessary to take into account whether there are special circumstances, such as children with disabilities, inability to live, etc., and appropriate adjustments can be made.

If the parents give the property to the son during their lifetime, then this part of the property will no longer be included in the inheritance after the death of the parents. At the same time, if the son can prove that certain properties are his personal property, such as houses, vehicles, etc., purchased by himself through the income from his work, then these properties will not be considered as inheritance, and Chun or Shou will not be included in the scope of inheritance. In short, if the father and the mother did not leave a will, their property should be divided equally among all the children, and special circumstances need to be taken into account in the actual implementation.

At the same time, if the parents give the property to the son during his lifetime or the son owns personal property, this part of the property will not be included in the scope of inheritance.

Dear, is there anything else you don't understand? Tell me more about your situation and I'll answer for you. <>

If the adopter has one child, he or she may adopt another person. The conditions for a legal adopter are: no children or only one child; have the ability to raise, educate and protect the adoptee; Not suffering from a medical condition that makes it medically inappropriate to adopt a child; There is no criminal record that is not conducive to the healthy growth of the adoptee; Be at least 30 years old.

[Legal basis].Article 1098 of the Civil Code.

The adopter shall meet the following conditions at the same time:

1) Have no children or only one child;

2) have the capacity to raise, educate and protect the adoptee;

3) Do not have a medical condition that medically deems unsuitable for adoption;

4) There is no record of violations or crimes that are detrimental to the adoptee's healthy growth;

5) Be at least 30 years old.

I don't think necessarily, but this kind of spirit is what we must have, because why it is said that we want to raise children and rich daughters in poverty, then it is for men to make boys more responsible, so that they can learn to be independent, so rich daughters are in fact, and it is also for the sake of the family, because if a daughter can have a better life, and she can have more broad-minded horizons, then in fact, for her upper and lower generations, they are very good candidates.

1. Why do you have to be poor and rich to raise daughters? From my point of view, I think that the poor son is to let the son have a better exercise, so that he can learn to live independently, not necessarily to give him economically, the poor son said to give him a sense of responsibility for physical and mental responsibility, so I think the essence of the poor child is to have a sense of responsibility and family, so the rich daughter is also a rich daughter, in fact, the girl as the pillar of the family, then for the upper, middle and lower generations, it is very important, Therefore, the education of a daughter actually directly determines the education of a family.

Second, do you think that the family must raise children and rich daughters in the family, in fact, I think the educational concept of the family is also correct. If it is a family that can support such a family, then I think it is possible to try it, because if you are poor and raise children, children can have better independent living ability, and the same is better opportunities and conditions for daughters, so I think this kind of thinking is not wrong, so we should use him reasonably.

3. What kind of views do we have through this educational philosophyWhat kind of views do we have through this educational concept of raising children from the poor and raising rich daughters? In fact, I think it is still in this phenomenon, to see his essence is the best, we through this educational concept, in fact, we can respond to the essence, that is, our concept of education is in fact, is to let children have more sense of responsibility, especially for children to have a sense of responsibility and family, then for daughters may be to better education, because although the education of boys is also important, in fact, I think the importance of girls is also very important, Because a girl is a very important position in the family, I think we should still understand this view.

Not necessarily, according to your own family conditions, you can raise a rich daughter if the family conditions are good, if the conditions are not good, you don't want it, I think it is good to treat the two children fairly.

It doesn't have to be poor to raise children and rich daughters. If the difference in treatment is too large, it may cause conflicts between them, and it is better to treat them fairly.

You don't have to be poor to raise children, rich to raise daughters, you can raise these two children well in life. Be spiritually rich, too.