Can the evaluation of history exclude the value orientation of individuals?

This is unlikely, the history of the compilation.

Whether it's personal subjective inclination or political factors.

It is impossible to exclude the value orientation of individuals, after all, history is written by the victorious side, and it cannot be absolutely true. It is always under the influence of the ruler and therefore cannot be ruled out.

It's difficult, and even those who are as wise as Confucius can't. You can evaluate history beyond ideology and partisanship, but you can't go beyond the precipitation of your established knowledge and the value orientation you have formed, otherwise it will not be "you" to evaluate. Moreover, your cognition can never get rid of the fact that there is one thing

You are also in the midst of history. This is how good a person is at imagining, and the appearance of extraterrestrial intelligent creatures is still inseparable from the appearance of people.

On the other hand, from the perspective of the recipient, it is also facing an insurmountable hurdle. People's accepted views or opinions are often also constrained by the history of the stage. This is also the root cause of why the elderly always look down on the young.

It is also a reason why the fate of those whose consciousness and thinking are too advanced in history is always tragic.

No, history must be fair and just, and there can be no bias, otherwise it is a kind of falsification of history, and now these 24 histories can only be believed in half, and problems must be found from the book, and the book cannot be fully believed.

As long as it is done by people, it is impossible to exclude personal orientation.

History is always indispensable for personal values!

It can be as objective as possible, but everyone has their own value orientation, which will affect the evaluation of history to a greater or lesser extent.

What position are you competing for, what are your own conditions, and if you don't explain this, how can others help you?

1. The main responsibilities of the position.

2. Competency requirements for the position.

3. What level of relevant competency have you reached?

4. How to play your strengths.

5. How do you avoid or make up for weaknesses?

6. Your policy program (this depends on the post).

Can you ask this kind of question!! LZ: Do you want to succeed in the competition?

Let's walk the form, right?

Whether or not it affects history is, of course, to see who wrote it, like ***, ***, they have influenced history, and the people who write history are now written by people within the Communist Party, and it is the modern history that we are learning now. After a few years, if someone from their time writes about it, some changes may occur, but the actual impact cannot be changed, and it is not easy for an ordinary person to influence history, but he has to do something earth-shattering and have great significance to this era before it will go down in history. Even if you are a bad person, only a great evil can affect history, and I have not heard of a history book of the Splash Girl Society.

According to Marxist theory, an individual cannot influence history. The classic of "Ma Zhe" says that "the appearance of heroes is inevitable, but who becomes a hero has its chances". There are many people who have a huge influence on history, but there are no people who determine the development of history, because the individual cannot determine history, only the interest groups or groups or people behind him who represent can determine history.

The masses of the people are the main body of practice and the creators of history, and individuals will play a certain role in history, and there are positive and negative roles, and those activities that conform to the development of history and are positive and advanced will promote the development of history, and on the contrary, those activities that run counter to the development of history and are negative will hinder the development of history. There are some heroes who will play a role in promoting history, but that is secondary, and the masses of people who really determine history.

Everyone is a hostage of history, people cannot change history, it is okay to influence, but it cannot have a decisive influence. God decides everything.

In fact, personal influence on history is just an excuse for a contradiction to erupt after it has been accumulated for a long time. Marx is great, right? At least in the eyes of the Chinese. But if it weren't for the workers and scholars who later supported him, what would his theory be now?

Meritorious efforts have a separate effect.

As you can imagine, you are a student who has just learned the best stocks. I bought ** at the lowest price ** up to the third of the price. In this case, I will not buy ** without knowing the lowest price.

Unless there is a problem with the performance of this listed company.

It should be said that everyone is changing history to a greater or lesser extent!

Although there are some accidental events in history, the course of history is inevitable. So, no matter who it is, it is impossible to change history.

No unless you're strong enough to be somehow! to rewrite the future!

She sought to pass on Jiaodong (Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty was once the king of Jiaodong) slightly inherited Pei Gong (Han Gaozu Liu Bang was once called Pei Gong), Fangliu Guanjin name left Han Qing, she helped Liu Heng achieve the rule of Wenjing, she wrote for the Han Dynasty to inherit the great cause of Han Gaozu and the "Yifang Era" of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, but only left Wenjing in the world.

A combination of shrewdness, decisiveness, bravery, and kindness.

Afford to put it down.

There is stamina, there is courage.

On the whole, he was a competent political figure who ensured the development of society in the early Han Dynasty.

As for loving the youngest son, it is also right.

There's nothing to do in the interview, it's just to ask questions, ask you anything, and you just answer truthfully and pretend to be blind. Generally, according to your questions, I will ask you certain questions, such as what do you like to do? If you say that you like to watch the Internet, you will be asked what you think of the news that has been hyped up on the Internet recently.

According to your opinion, put forward the argument within the points. There is also an assessment, the interviewer is divided into several groups, and the lottery is divided into groups to discuss, and the speeches of several of you are discussed will be scored.

It's really nothing, you just say whatever comes to your mind, and having a good attitude like a normal chat is the key to success.