Nikon Digital Camera Comparison Nikon SLR! Suitability, and value for money!

The price/performance ratio is of course higher than that of the L810. But if you compare the image quality, the cheapest SLR is also better than any machine in the coolpix series, but if you buy a lens with a wide angle to 26x zoom that the SLR wants to match, this is a lot of money, but the image quality is incomparable to the L810. You still need to consider buying it yourself, the budget is not large, L810, if you want to spend a lot of money on photography in the later stage, then simply buy a single reverse.

It is recommended to buy D3000 The biggest advantage of SLR over general cameras is the image sensor, the CMOS of SLR is much larger, and the imaging is much better, so the imaging is much better than L810, and it is also beneficial to change the lens! There are also more SLR functions, there are manual gears or something, you can learn more photography knowledge!

Actually, I think the LX5 under the board is very good, very good-looking, and the imaging is good, and its CCD is 1 which is much larger than the 1 of the L810.

Generally, there is no need for a SLR, which requires a lot of supporting equipment and knowledge, and spends money and energy. If you want to pursue a sense of accomplishment, then the SLR. But remember, when you buy equipment, cheap is expensive!

I want to buy a DSLR camera. That kind of cost-effective is good. I'm a photography enthusiast. There are also wide-angle and telephoto generally on the market Nikon, Canon, Sony divide the world equally, depending on personal preference. Nikon leather is durable and has good sharpness

If you don't often shoot in low light, night scenes, or don't need high-speed continuous shooting!!

Shoot under normal conditions, this one is enough!!

One is lighter and more portable; One override is better, but it's a lot heavier.

D5100, D3100 is cheap, but it's too rudimentary. The rest of what you see on the Internet are outdated products, ** not much down, and the technology is backward.

It depends on the budget. If you get started, you don't need to buy the full width or anything.,DX,It's still recommended to buy D90 or 60D.。 I also got into the Canon 60D two months ago, and I also have a rotating screen, which feels pretty good.

Nikon's D90 is a classic.

The five most worthwhile shots from Nikon are as follows:

1. Nikkor 50mm

This is a product with a high response on the market, it is lightweight, practical and convenient, and it will not be inflated. If the subject is a novice, you can choose to buy a 50mm practice hand. The effect of 50mm shooting is similar to the angle of view of the human eye, so you don't need to worry about distortion.

The aperture is large, which can easily cope with the harsh shooting environment, all kinds of dim scenes, cluttered backgrounds, and night scenes can be completely faced!

Second, Nikkor 24-70mm

The Nikkor 24-70mm is a commendable choice for many photography enthusiasts. Basically, the focal lengths from 24 to 70 are used for portrait shooting. All kinds of shooting can be satisfied, and the focal length has a wide angle, a standard focal length, and a portrait focal length, although the aperture is not as exaggerated as the fixed focus, but the portrait shooting is also sufficient.

3. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm F ED

If internal focusing, quiet fluctuating motor, fast and quiet focusing, dustproof and moisture-proof. 24-70This focal length has played a panacea effect for portraits,Humanistic landscapes,The imaging of each focal length is very good,Compare Canon to know,Nikon's 24-end distortion control is quite good,Both imaging resolution are extremely satisfied,The aperture is still sharp when the aperture is fully open,The color is great,The atmosphere is excellent in low light,The dark part is also clear。

4. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm F 4G ED VR

The workmanship is good, the focal length is very practical, and the scenery and portraits are both. The imaging quality is also good, and it is the best choice for tourist heads. The imaging is also good in low light, and the stabilization is very practical, and this lens is enough for home use. Built-in shock absorption improves 4 shutter stops, inner focus, and two focusing modes, M A and M.

5. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm F ED

Excellent optical quality, including full image field resolution, dispersion control, and backlight control, are at a level comparable to that of advanced prime lenses at the same aperture. The lamp structure provides better edge sharpness and resolution and edge dispersion control than the inverted telephoto structure, while the lamp structure provides closer macro focusing.

There are many lenses, and they are selected according to the type of body and the subject of shooting.

Ordinary enthusiasts, who do not have a specific shooting subject, can choose the standard zoom head, 18-140 for the half-frame machine, and 24-70 for the full-frame.

1. Photography has a purpose, even if it is bright, it can be regarded as a purpose. Are you keen to be an enthusiast, or do you just have fun and become a slightly stronger photographer than the average person? The former recommends Canon, and the latter recommends Nikon.

The high-end lens Canon has the advantage, and the low-mid range Nikon is slightly stronger. Of course, there are also rich people who take 100,000 yuan of equipment to play casually. In this case, both brands will satisfy you.

2. If the price is not a problem, the 40,000 Canon 1DS Mark 3 and the 30,000 Nikon D3S are the best choices. There are few rivals in the 135 camera, except in medium format. Next is 15,000 or 6,000 pieces of 5D2 and D700,Each entry-level full-frame fuselage,The picture quality is also quite good,Investing 30,000 yuan can basically let you see satisfactory picture quality。

But looking at the two examples you cited, it seems that they are both low-end fuselages, ** in 4-5 thousand, I don't know if you are considering this price?

3. At this price point, it is recommended that Canon consider 50D and Nikon consider D90. Canon's 550D and 500D are, after all, entry-level machines, and the 50D are not in the same class. It is not recommended to consider 60d, one is that there is still room for price reduction in the product that has just come out, and the other is that individual functions have shrunk, which is obviously not kind enough.

50d has been on the market for two years, and it is basically very reasonable. The Nikon D90 is also quite good at the price/performance ratio, with a high-end entry-level for novices to play.

4. There are too many choices of lenses, so it is best to inform the budget before recommending them. It is better not to listen to the profiteers, they are talking about profits, and appropriate exaggeration or belittling is their usual method.

Explanation of terms: Full-frame refers to a camera with an image sensor CMOS size of about 36*24mm, and APS-C format refers to a camera with an image sensor size of about 24*16mm.

Nikon and Canon are good in their own way.

Canon machines have a strong sense of plastic.

If you buy it in Hong Kong, the warranty is troublesome, and it is recommended to buy licensed goods.

There are dealers on Nikon's homepage, and the region is looking for Zhejiang, so take a look at the 550D for yourself, which is a Nikon entry machine.

D90 is a mid-range machine, there is no comparison, the budget is 7k, I think, D90 is no suspense, and then it is cheaperD5000

As for the so-called fuselage motor, I personally feel that it is useless at all, and it is currently all AFS lenses.

If you are just starting to play, I recommend you Nikon for 2 reasons

1.Nikon's entry-level fuselage design is kinder than Canon's, and there are any spot metering and the like. The body is relatively canonical, and the individual is artificially strong.

2.Lens, high-end lens Canon is indeed great, but non-L lens Canon is not generous enough, Nikon anyway, the quality of ordinary lenses is higher than Canon, and the top lens is slightly inferior to Canon. So for novices, Nikon lenses are more suitable.

Hope it works for you.

Nikon professional, but Nikon killed a lot of Chinese in World War II, suggesting Panasonic. Footage of Laika. Good stabilization. It is not recommended for Sony, it is too delicate, it is not recommended for Canon, and it is not good for SLR. No home machine does it well.

The same question, depending on what subject you like to shoot, Nikon for landscapes, Canon for portraits, Canon for lenses, and Nikon for wide-angle lenses. Canon has 450D, 500D, 550D, Nikon has D3000, D5000, D300, D300S, D90, these are all entry-level machines.

Unconditional Nikon! It's expensive though!

There is no way to make this money, it is destined to be earned by Little Japan.

Is this a question that all beginners to buying a DSLR will ask??! Since Nikon switched to CMOS, both product performance and imaging style have actually become more and more convergent, and the gap is getting smaller and smaller. In fact, whether you choose Canon or Nikon, it is enough to meet all the needs of a beginner enthusiast.

If you have a long-term photography plan, I personally think Canon is better for the long term. Nikon does not have core imaging element technology, and in the past two years, it has been limited by the inability to improve the pixels, which has made it fully disadvantageous to Canon, and the old lens mount has also been Nikon's long-standing bottleneck, and Canon broke its wrist as early as 20 years ago to completely solve this problem. So judging from the current situation, Canon's ascent should be better than Nikon's, and the lens retention is also better.

Of course, it cannot be ruled out that Nikon suddenly broke out to develop a super-powerful alien device or something, which is another matter.

Each has its own characteristics.

Nikon is good for landscapes, Canon is good for portraits.

Used d40

Used 300d

All very cheap.