Can the J 10 be taken off on a Chinese aircraft carrier????

Updated on military 2024-06-09
9 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    No. The J-10 take-off runway is at least 1,000 meters, and the aircraft carrier runway is just over 300 meters. The J-15 carrier-based aircraft currently being developed by China is specially developed for Chinese aircraft carriers.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    No, the J-10 is a land-based aircraft with a take-off distance of at least 1 km, the aircraft carrier is only 200-300 meters, and the Chinese carrier-based aircraft is the J-15 (the prototype is the same as the Su-33, the ship-planted version of the Su-27).

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    No, the J-10 is not a carrier-based aircraft, and if the aircraft carrier is built, the J15 will be there.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    The J-10 is a land aircraft, it should not work, and it may be possible to change it, but it is too much, I heard that a carrier-based aircraft is now being developed.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    105 meters.

    There are three take-off points on the Liaoning, the first two are 105 meters and the last one is 195 meters; This time, the J-15 took off with a light load, so it used a short take-off point, 105 meters.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The length of the Liaoning is more than 300 meters, and it is impossible for carrier-based aircraft to take off from one extreme to another, and it is estimated that it should start to glide at one-third of the way, that is, more than 200 meters, and it is impossible to exceed 250 meters.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    It's all 100 meters, not only the J-15, but also the Su-33, with a take-off distance of 100 meters.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    In case of emergency, take off 100 meters as required.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    <> "After the J-15, what kind of carrier-based aircraft will my country's aircraft carriers use?"

    China's second aircraft carrier is in service, and there is only one J-15 carrier-based aircraft. As the core combat force of aircraft carriers, China's aircraft carriers also attach great importance to the development of carrier-based aircraft.

    The J-15 is the first carrier-based fighter of China's aircraft carriers, so what kind of carrier-based aircraft will China adopt after it?

    The J-15 carrier-based fighter is the only heavy carrier-based aircraft in the world, and in addition to China's aircraft carriers, the aircraft carriers of other countries are using medium-sized carrier-based aircraft, including the United States and Russia, of course. So is it that the United States and Russia have been using medium-sized carrier-based aircraft from the beginning, or have they found that medium-sized carrier-based aircraft do have obvious relative advantages after comparison, and the United States made the choice of medium-sized carrier-based fighters after comparison?

    In fact, the last heavy carrier-based fighter of the US Navy was once known as the 'strongest carrier-based heavy fighter', and it is the F-14 'Tomcat' carrier-based fighter, and its most eye-catching feature is the variable swept wing + 'Immortal Bird' long-range air-to-air missile.

    However, after the Cold War, the US Navy's aircraft carriers and carrier-based aircraft were transformed, and the 'Rhubarb Oakbee' began to become the main force. Medium fighters replace heavy fighters, and the U.S. Navy has always used them, so many people are curious, what is the charm of the F-18 'Hornet' fighter?

    In fact, when the 'Hornet' was the main carrier-based aircraft of the aircraft carrier, the US aircraft carrier also had A-6 7 carrier-based attack aircraft on board at the same time. The Tomcat mainly relies on its large combat distance to intercept Soviet heavy air-to-ship missiles and supersonic bombers, so as to protect the aircraft carrier within a safe range as much as possible.

    After the Cold War, a big adversary like the Soviet Union has gone, and the hidden danger of long-range threats to US aircraft carriers in the world has disintegrated, which has exacerbated the retirement of the 'Tomcat'. On the other hand, the high cost of the Tomcat and the failure rate also troubled the US Navy. It was under such circumstances that the sockbranch 'Bumblebee' began to enter the US Navy.

    As a medium-sized carrier-based aircraft, the 'Hornet' not only possesses a certain degree of air defense combat capability, but also possesses a certain degree of sea-to-ground attack capability at the same time. On the one hand, this is convenient for aircraft carrier combat adjustment, and on the other hand, it also makes the logistics of the US Navy more worry-free and labor-saving. Originally, it was responsible for the maintenance of long-range and short-range carrier-based aircraft, but now it can only manage the 'Hornet' fighters, so the US Navy is naturally very willing, and as a result, medium-sized carrier-based aircraft have begun to become popular.

    It may only be a matter of time before the heavy carrier-based aircraft used by our navy will be replaced, after all, some experiences have been explored by other countries over the years, and they are still very meaningful for reference.

Related questions
9 answers2024-06-09

Main parameters Main dimensions: length 304 meters, waterline 281 meters; >>>More

10 answers2024-06-09

Not a copycat. To briefly reside, the Varyag is the second of the Kuznetsov class of aircraft carriers built during the Soviet era (the first is the "Kuznetsov", which is now in service with the Russian Navy), but it was not completed, and it was 68% built by the time of the collapse of the Soviet Union. Later, Russia ran out of money, didn't want it, and Ukraine's own naval strategy didn't need such a big ship, so it was sold to China, but the power system, the ** system, and the electronic system were dismantled, and it was basically sold to China as an empty shell. >>>More

19 answers2024-06-09

Hehehe, I guess the aircraft carrier I built is similar to the Varyag, that is, to make some improvements, the reason is very simple, most of the talents trained by China's education will be imitated, and they will not innovate, plus the system is not good. The few remaining top-notch talents have flown abroad. Don't expect much from China's aircraft carriers, the greater the hope, the greater the disappointment, we must admit the current situation of Chinese society, dare to face it, don't fantasize about it, the current social contradictions have reached a certain point, and it is impossible to say that the sky will change one day. >>>More

14 answers2024-06-09

As soon as 2015, we will deploy aircraft, train pilots and ground crew, and then conduct exercises for at least three years.