Panasonic mirrorless 12 32 lens is quite Canon s what lens?

This is not comparable, Panasonic's lens has an equivalent focal length of 24-70, which is the same as Canon's 24-105 focal length.

Not the same, the full width of the Canon.

If the head is placed on the half-frame, the poor focal length is even farther away. From the imaging point of view, Canon, this is a full-frame L lens, and although the quality of Panasonic's head is not bad, it is limited by the image quality and full-frame of mirrorless mirrors, and there is still a distance from it.

The focal length conversion coefficient of Panasonic mirrorless seems to be 2......

Thus, the equivalent focal length of a 12-32 lens is 24-64 ......

If you look at it this way, you will understand much ......This lens is equivalent to 24-70 ...... in a full-frame shotOf course, this lens is not a constant aperture, so it is ...... lower than the 24-70

If you shoot both, it is recommended that you choose from GX85 and M50, M5, M6 don't need to be considered, M50 still supports 4K. Which one to choose,It depends on what kind of **and** you shoot,GX85The advantage is that there are richer lens groups,Stronger4K**Function,There is also body stabilization。 The main advantage of M50 is that the sensor specifications are larger, the ** autofocus in dual-core focus mode is very reliable, and it is very convenient to flip the screen to record a vlog or something, the biggest problem is that there are few dedicated lenses, and you often have to transfer to Canon's SLR lens, and Canon's half-frame SLR lens is not much.

To put it simply, if it is to record daily life and play vlog or something, M50 is more practical. If you want to play deeper, you still have to choose gx85. Of course, you can also consider other brands such as Sony, Fujifilm, etc.

The Panasonic GX7 is an image sensor with M4 3 specifications, and the Hengming Canon G7X is a 1-inch image sensor.

In the same era, the larger the image sensor area, the better the image quality; Na Xiao.

This is a Panasonic zoom lens used in a 4 3 system mirrorless camera, the physical focal length is 12-32mm, and the actual equivalent focal length is 24-62mm (the focal length conversion factor of the 4 3 system camera is 2). f is the maximum aperture value of the lens, the maximum aperture at 12mm is is, and the maximum aperture at 32mm is.

In addition to the difference between manual and electric, these two lenses are also different ...... in terms of parameter specifications and performance indicators

If it's not bad for money, the higher one is obviously better ......

If you pursue cost performance, the lower one is enough.

For ordinary users, it is simple and practical to make a choice according to this criterion, ......

The former is recommended. The former is one of the famous lenses in the Panasonic lens system that is very famous for its large ternary lenses, which is characterized by fast focusing speed and constant aperture. This is useful in travel photography. Of course, this lens is larger and heavier. And it's a manual zoom head.

Portable must be mirrorless. Sony 5T or A6000 set is good, better than EM10.

With **14-42ez electric head, it is very lightweight.

No. Your Panasonic FZ18 is a consumer-grade camera with a fixed lens. A Canon 50mm F lens is already much more expensive than your Panasonic FZ18 camera, so I don't think there's any need to toss around, right?

I took a fancy to the Canon 50mm F lens, so I directly abandoned the Panasonic FZ18 and simply bought a DSLR.

Panasonic's mirrorless camera, due to the cancellation of the reflector, the image distance is relatively short, so it can be transferred to the SLR lens with a long image distance, Nikon, Canon's SLR lens can be transferred to Panasonic, Olympus, Sony single battery. Of course, the definition of the interface varies from one to the other, so it is impossible to have an autofocus function after the switch, and for all Canon lenses and some Nikon lenses, you can't adjust the aperture on the body because they don't have a manual aperture ring, so you can only shoot with the aperture wide open.

The FZ18 is a point-and-shoot camera with non-interchangeable lenses, which cannot be replaced, let alone transferred to other lenses.

No, the lens of the Panasonic FZ18 is fixed and cannot be changed for any lens.

The FZ-18 can't change the lens...

If you want to change the lens, at least it must be a DSLR...

You can add a UV and it will look like a new lens

Conscience said oh, Panasonic's mirrorless technology is very advanced, and it is not expensive.

The friend on the first floor is probably Panasonic's to.

In terms of lenses, you yourself said that Panasonic cooperated with Laika, since it was a cooperation, where did the "......" come fromare all independently developed and produced by Panasonic"? If the lens is produced in-house, then why label Leica? This is like how your own son has someone else's surname!

When it comes to cameras, Canon produced its first camera in 1937, but what about Panasonic? I'm sorry to say it.

In terms of image stabilization, Canon was the first in the world to use optical image stabilization technology in 1995 for the 75-300mm lens, while Panasonic was only equipped with an optical shake compensation system in the DMC-FX1 for the first time in 2003.

On CCD, the landlord is also misleading, in fact, there are six manufacturers in the world in the large-scale production of CCD, the output ranking is Sony, Fujifilm, Kodak, Philips, the last two are Sharp and Panasonic, they are not ranked due to the very small sales. It seems that the landlord is very bold to mislead!

Having said all this, it is not to belittle Panasonic, but to express extreme support for someone who misleads regardless of the facts!

In the ordinary level of small digital cameras, Canon has a great advantage, and in terms of flagship small digital cameras, Panasonic has the LX series to compete with Canon's G series, but the main reason for being able to compete is the Leica lens, 16:9 picture, more portability, etc., the real point of picture quality is still not comparable to Canon G series.

Summary: 1, if you buy DC, consumer-grade, it must be Canon.

2. If you buy DC, flagship, Canon G series and Panasonic LX series.

3. If you buy a DSLR, it must be Canon and Nikon.

Canon is the leader in the field of digital photography, and Nikon is second.

Panasonic cameras can't improve the image quality except for the new LX3.

In cooperation with Leica, the lens quality and electronic technology are excellent, Canon's new highlight this year, smart shooting mode, Panasonic's IA smart mode was available a year earlier, Canon's IS optical image stabilization may be clear to everyone, but optical image stabilization was first developed by Panasonic, Panasonic's cameras, lenses, electronic components, chips, CCDs, and even batteries are independently developed and produced by Panasonic, and there are only two in the world that can produce CCD. You can rest assured that you can buy Panasonic with a small card, and it is recommended to choose Nikon Canon for SLR.

The image quality of the first is still on the SLR, the image quality of consumer cameras is average, and the fz18 camera is used, if you look at the actual size of the noise, it is unbearable!

Let me give you some advice. Judging from the prices of these three cameras you gave, I guess your budget should be around 4000-5000.

So, for SLR, I still don't recommend it.

I think it's still suitable for you. G12, I think the cost performance is relatively low. Not recommended. And it's heavier.

Let me tell you about the more popular mirrorless lines on the market now, and make a comparison with the Canon 600D.

First, Olympus's mirrorless, Obba's mirrorless, the biggest advantage, I personally think is color. His pen series is a mirrorless and retro appearance, which suits my taste. And the material is also very powerful, and the current EPL3 and EP3 focusing speed has completely surpassed the entry-level SLR.

But ** not powerful. The shape of EPL3 is not good-looking, I personally think ha. EP3 is too expensive.

Second, the Panasonic series you mentioned, g3 and gf3, gf2, and gx1Personally, I recommend you to buy GX1... The GX1 and G3 now focus in seconds...

It is only stronger than the general SLR, and when focusing in the dark, 600D will hesitate, but the GX1 can still focus quickly. In addition, these models of Panasonic are relatively fashionable. All have touch screens, some people say that the override of mirrorless is not as good as that of SLR, but it is not like this.

Because there is a touch screen, such as color temperature fine-tuning, etc., you can directly swipe the screen without pressing buttons like a DSLR, or fluctuating the scroll wheel... Especially in the GX1, when you are on the street, you can directly tap the screen and focus on the pedestrians. That's called a quick ...

Finally, let's talk about G3,,, G3's cost performance is higher than Gx1, there is an additional EVF, and the screen can be flipped as soon as you turn it on. The parallel goods of these two machines are the same, both of which are more than 2800 points. However, the shape of the G3 is biased towards SLR, and the GX1 is biased towards fashion.

If you can accept the form factor of the G3, buy the G3, and if you want to buy something more compact, go for the GX1. A machine with a biscuit head and an x14-42 electric zoom head. **Within 5000 (parallel imports).

ps, because Panasonic's parallel goods ** are too powerful, so it is highly recommended.

Third,Sony's nex,In addition to the shape,Not very powerful (with Sony's pullover),And the focusing speed is not as good as GX1G3,Olympus's EP3,Others,In terms of image quality,Features are stronger than the latter。。。 The key is to have a large picture... **Not powerful, licensed parallel goods, all more expensive.

The 600d format is larger than that of the 4 3 model, and the depth of field can be shallower,。。 In addition, the lens group is relatively large. Other... Ay...

I prefer the GX1 and X14-42 heads as a perfect match!。

If you have any questions, you can detain me, 717084325

I think we're quite similar, and I started with small cards and then slowly progressed to SLR. Later, I also felt that the SLR was too big and heavy, and it was inconvenient to carry. And the fuselage is too big (I used Fujifilm S5 to accompany Nikon Gold wide angle), passers-by sometimes deliberately avoid it when they see it when they shoot on the street.

Now I also want to change to a smaller one, to change to the kind of entry-level SLR, which is lightweight.

Picture quality, operability, SLR is absolutely better than any card machine, and you also have friends who play SLR, and it is also very good to use the lens when the time comes. But you feel big. Why don't you take a look at buying a second-hand 1000d?

This one is a bit smaller than the 600d, and the quality is very good. (There is news on the Internet, there is a buddy who dropped 1000d into the sea, and was accidentally discovered by a diver a year later, fished up, and the ** in the SD can still be read perfectly、、、 this is too **、、、 the bottom of the sea has been sinking for more than a year、、、.)

I think it's also a good choice to enter high-end cards, and the soft image quality is actually similar to that of the SLR (note that it is the soft image quality, it looks.) ）。But they are easy to carry and shoot at hand, so I think this is the best way to enjoy the shooting.

I usually hold a DSLR, and when I shoot, I always think about the aperture shutter, the depth of field, or something, and I feel a little restricted... Look at these requirements of the landlord, you look at Samsung EX1, I think this machine is more perfect. Flip screen, large aperture, portable card.

Canon that I haven't tried, I've tried the Nikon P7000 at the same level, it's too bad, really. In addition, these machines, the optical viewfinder is really painful... I don't know what to think, so let's get this.

I've tried, and the viewfinder is very small, very difficult to use, and it is too much worse than the traditional sidefinder, almost a decoration, and there is no practicality.

Monoelectric is an emerging product, which is still too immature compared to SLR. Naturally, he has his advantages, but the disadvantages are also very obvious. As you said, in layman's terms, it is "unprofessional, it's not reliable".

Look at the need. If it can meet your needs, the image quality and operability of the single electric are definitely better than those of small cards.

I've used some cards, single batteries, and SLRs, and I feel that the biggest gap is operability. The DSLR is very easy to operate and convenient, and you can control the picture very well, but this requires you to have a lot of experience to control the machine. And the card, almost like a point-and-shoot camera that supports manuals.

You don't need to go to the professional stuff, you just need to know what you want to shoot and press the shutter. Recording, I think this is the essence of photography. There is less single electricity, not much to describe, that is, the advantages and disadvantages are obvious, depending on the demand.

Landlord,I'm the same as you.,I want to shoot something and it's too big a SLR.,May I ask if your G3 is heavy or not? I'm hesitating, if g3 is also not good to carry, I'll gx1. But I want the cost performance of G3!! Asking for advice!!

The G12 character ratio is too poor. To be as small as the card machine. It's almost the same as a single electricity.

Not small imaging is a fraction of a single electricity. 12. It's good to operate, and it's retro, and the others are honestly not good at all.

If it was two years ago, it would have chosen 12, and now it will be completely eliminated.

Of course, everyone's vision and operation style are different, and everyone has hobbies.

In terms of imaging and function, choose Sony's single battery, which is very good.

I'm using the Panasonic LX5 right now