If you can t go to college, is it useful to read a debate question 20

If you can't go to college, is it useful to study? Do you mean that it is useful to go to college, or that if you can't go to college, it is useless to study? This logic is interesting.

It's like you can't eat bird's nest, is it still useful to eat? Or, if you can't get married, is it useful to fall in love? A truth.

First of all, you need to understand the purpose of going to college and the purpose of studying. The common denominator is to gain knowledge and improve your ability to better understand and transform the world. But there are also differences, going to college is a way to study, (think about your reading here, not only the meaning of itself).

In addition to going to university, you can also study on your own and continue to study to gain knowledge. Many of our revolutionaries in the past, who did not even go to elementary school, continued to study and study in the course of struggle, and finally became outstanding figures (such as Liang Daya and Liang Bida in "The Sky of History").

From another point of view, if you go to college, does it mean that you don't need to study after graduation, if this view is true, it may support your current view to a certain extent. But it is clear that this view does not hold. This is why many people go back to graduate school after graduating from college and working for a few years.

Another question worth thinking about is "why do so many college students return to technical schools?"

Second, what is the weight of universities in the education system as a whole? According to news reports, next year, the enrollment scale of secondary vocational schools in China will exceed that of ordinary high schools for the first time. We know that higher vocational colleges are also a way to study.

In Switzerland, a significant number of Nobel laureates are from higher vocational colleges.

In addition, for those comrades who have only reached high school, does it mean that they should not study in the future? So how can they further improve their scientific and cultural qualities? For what we are talking about, building a harmonious society, that is not a good thing.

In fact, only in this way can we sail against the current and face difficulties. Especially in the context of the current economic crisis, it is necessary to further improve one's ability and enrich oneself, so as to make achievements, achieve something, and realize one's own value.

After high school, my studies are mainly major-oriented. I didn't go to college.

No regrets. It costs too much money to go to college. It's the same as learning things in society.

I don't really look at diplomas now. It depends on ability and experience. Especially Shenzhen, which is a developing city.

I didn't go to college, as long as you were willing to study. I can do it well.

Great use! Read books that interest you, in particular.

It's very useful, you just don't think of reading as studying, you can also read books to kill time.

University debates are still necessary. The university has a history of thousands of years. At first, it was mainly developed from Germany, Britain and other countries.

Modern Chinese universities originated in the West, and modern Western universities gradually evolved from European medieval universities, British universities, German universities, and then American universities. Regardless of the era, the universities are the creative hail of the previous universities, inheriting rather than negating.

Mission

The mission of the university, which is governed by the philosophy of the university, requires that the students cultivated by the university are first and foremost educated people of noble character and culture, which is in line with the essence of the university.

This mission refers to cultivating students' complete personality, purifying students' minds, cultivating students' conduct, and exercising students' ability to criticize things, rather than just providing students with professional education.

Summary. No, reading can help us broaden our horizons, increase our knowledge, improve our abilities, expand our thinking, stimulate creativity, improve self-cultivation, expand interpersonal relationships, etc., not just for university debate.

No, reading can help us broaden our horizons, increase our knowledge, improve our abilities, expand our thinking, stimulate creativity, improve our self-cultivation, expand our interpersonal relationships, etc., not just for the sake of debating in college.

Can you tell us more about that?

First of all, reading a book is not necessarily for the purpose of debating in college, it can be to broaden your horizons, increase your knowledge, improve your ability, and so on. However, if you want to participate in a college debate, then reading books is essential. First of all, in order to participate in a college debate, you need to have a lot of knowledge, which can be acquired by reading books.

Reading books can help you better understand the topic of the debate and can help you better support your own opinions. Secondly, the Reading Sock button can help you improve your debating skills. By reading different debate chapters, you can learn different debate skills and better participate in university debates.

Finally, reading books can help you better grasp the knowledge of debate so that you can better participate in college debates. In short, reading is a prerequisite for participating in college debates, which can help you better understand the topic of debate, improve your debate skills, and master the knowledge of debate, so as to better participate in college debates. Personal Tips:

1.When reading a book, you should pay attention to the key points and don't waste time on irrelevant knowledge. 2.

At the end of the year, we should think more, summarize more, and ask more questions in order to better understand and master knowledge. 3.When you are studying, you should accumulate more knowledge of debate so that you can better participate in university debates.

Positive: Exams are not only a test of learning, but also a way to promote a competitive atmosphere for learning. The cancellation of exams may bring a certain degree of lack of motivation and a decline in the learning atmosphere.

The cancellation of exams may cause many students to feel relaxed and confused about their studies. Because there was no direct competition and result. If you get used to such an environment, then let the students go to a society with fierce competition and increased pressure.

Clearly an irresponsible behavior. In summary. Obviously, universities should not cancel exams.

Against: Exams are just a test of learning. There are actually many alternatives to exams.

First of all, it is important to note that the premise of our discussion is the college student population. When we arrived at university, what we advocated and implemented was more self-directed learning that clarified our own goals. The abolition of university exams can effectively reduce the burden on students and allow most students to make better use of their university study time.

You have to understand. A student who is relatively not active in learning after canceling the pressure on his body. The results are not going to be better, obviously worse.

There are countless disadvantages of exams. Waste a lot of study time just to prepare for exams and get good grades. In fact, during the revision process, it may just be rote memorization without any progress.

The pressure that comes with grades. The rigidity and confinement brought about by the delimitation of the scope of the examination are stifling students' creativity and subjectivity in learning.

Personal opinion above. Hope it helps you ...

Are you positive or negative.