What will be the impact on education if the abolition of the link between primary and secondary scho

Abolishing the linkage between primary and secondary school titles and salaries will have a positive impact on education by stabilizing the teaching force, improving teachers' enthusiasm for work, and further improving the quality of education and teaching.

At present, teachers set their salaries by their professional titles, but there are restrictions on the number of middle and senior professional titles in schools, especially the number of senior professional titles is small, and the number of teachers who meet the conditions is far more than the limited quota, which results in an excessively large income gap between teachers with similar qualifications, academic qualifications, abilities, workload, and achievements (especially teachers in rural compulsory education), and even the difference between senior professional titles and junior professional titles is nearly half. This situation also has a serious impact on the retirement benefits of teachers.

To run a school well, we must rely on more than 90 percent of the teachers. Determining salaries based on teachers' professional titles not only fails to truly mobilize the enthusiasm of the majority of teachers, but on the contrary, the income gap is too large due to professional titles, which seriously affects the enthusiasm of teachers. In particular, teachers who do not have the opportunity to be promoted to the next level have no hope, and there is a psychological imbalance, which leads to a serious loss of teachers.

Teachers who can't change jobs have negative thoughts about getting by. Every time middle and senior teachers are evaluated and appointed, there are many contradictions between teachers, between teachers and leaders, and between teachers and appointment committees, which gives corruption an opportunity to take advantage of.

Because of the income gap of professional title remuneration, there are too many artificial colors, and the resulting sense of unfairness is the strongest, and the policy of remuneration for teachers' salaries with professional titles affects stability, destroys fairness, damages the relationship between cadres and the masses, and has a serious negative impact on the construction of a harmonious society.

In order to prevent unfair distribution and then cause social problems, it is necessary to gradually dilute the salary of professional titles, or cancel the salary of primary and secondary school teachers, and establish an income distribution system that is dialectically unified in terms of efficiency and fairness, which is conducive to stabilizing the ranks of teachers, improving teachers' enthusiasm for work, further improving the quality of education and teaching, and running the cause of primary and secondary education.

For the time being, the abolition of teacher titles has a very big impact on teachers' income! Otherwise, front-line teachers who have been working for more than ten or twenty years will not think that the professional title has affected the development of education, and they will not shout for the cancellation of the teacher's professional title one day. In fact, for the question of how much teachers earn, the title is really a big deal.

In addition to professional titles, the contradiction between teachers' income is more prominent, and there are two more prominent items: private make-up classes and teaching seniority salaries. The fundamental purpose of the title is to encourage teachers to continuously improve their teaching ability. However, the 30-year-old professional title system has become a tool to distinguish the treatment of teachers, and the evaluation of professional titles can be completely fraudulent and once and for all, so the advantages of canceling must outweigh the disadvantages.

The gap between teachers and teachers, teachers and leaders in the level of salaries is smaller, more.

It's fair, the teacher is more comfortable, and he can teach more attentively. The teaching level of teachers can be evaluated through school teaching competitions. According to the current situation, the reform of teachers in some areas or the abolition of teacher personnel is being piloted, and the impact of professional titles as salaries will be weakened in the future.

This question is very professional, and the effect and impact can only be determined with the passage of time, but the title and salary are linked, which will bring appreciation and hard work attitude to some people, and bring opportunities.

This may lead to a better education. Educate.

This is a good initiative to motivate the enthusiasm of the teaching staff.

This system will affect the development of education, and the motivation of teachers will be reduced. Such a good income distribution system should allow our education to flourish. However, in the process of specific operation in various places, it has become a serious obstacle to motivate teachers.

Artificially setting difficulties and bottlenecks for teachers' job evaluation, such as the number and quality of English proficiency tests, publications, continuing education scores, excellent evaluations and priority evaluations, and even the close relationship between individuals and school leaders, all directly determine whether teachers are qualified and have the opportunity to participate in evaluation.

The imposition of quota restrictions on job evaluation has led to a surge in fair and just job evaluation, especially the destruction of human factors and the breeding of unfairness. The proportion of professional title salary in the basic performance salary of teachers is too large, which leads to the widening gap between the salary levels of teachers at all levels. Secondary school teachers can earn 2-3 times more per month than the average senior teacher, which is embarrassing for young teachers and retired teachers who are not rated as senior teachers.

On the negative side, there is no job title to limit the level of wages, and there is a lack of a more equitable and specific standard to widen the gap. Income distribution is easy to fall into the quagmire of egalitarianism, which in turn directly affects the motivation of teachers. Without the difference in professional titles, teachers will have no motivation to pursue their careers, and their work will be boring step by step, and there will be fewer and fewer young talents who are willing to teach, which will restrict the further development of education, or even regress.

To sum up, the positive impact of abolishing the link between teacher titles and salaries on compulsory education is far less than the negative impact, and the consequences are more serious. This approach is not advisable. Then we can make further reforms.

Under the premise of increasing the total salary of teachers, the weight of the impact of professional titles on teachers' salaries can be relatively reduced, the proportion of incentive performance pay can be increased, the salary level of teaching experience can be improved, and the impact of professional titles on teachers' salaries can be gradually eliminated.

It will have an impact on education, and in the end, there will be a shortage of teachers, so the quality of education may not be improved.

This situation will have an impact on education, because it will affect the motivation of teachers, so I think this measure should be treated sensibly.

Will the abolition of the link between teacher titles and salaries have an impact on education?

Will the abolition of the link between teacher titles and salaries have an impact on education? Hello, dear, <>

If the title of primary and secondary school teachers is linked to salary, it will have a positive impact on compulsory educationAt present, the evaluation of primary and secondary school teachers' titles has forgotten its original intention in some places, changed its taste, and cannot play a positive role in motivating. Compulsory education is basic education, and every teacher should be mobilized to have love, a sense of responsibility, and a sense of professionalism for students, so as to truly play the role of teaching and educating people. At the beginning, the evaluation of professional titles did play a positive role in motivating teachers, but with the passage of time, the system regulations and evaluation conditions increased, such as academic qualifications, years of service, evaluation ratio, number of evaluations, post restrictions, performance requirements, etc.

In addition, the evaluation of professional titles and seniority, the evaluation of outstanding people in turn, or whoever is promoted to the title of the year, and the publication of ** depends on spending money, so that the positive incentive effect of the evaluation title is gradually weakened, and the negative impact is getting bigger and bigger. Because the professional title is linked to the salary, all the work and activities of the teacher are carried out around the promotion of the professional title, which deviates from the original intention of teaching and educating people, preaching and teaching to solve doubts. The abolition of the title grade of primary and secondary school teachers is linked to the salary, which will definitely be welcomed by primary and secondary school teachers!

First, it is conducive to reducing the ideological and psychological pressure of teachers to promote their titles. Teachers don't have to spend a lot of time and energy on evaluating professional titles outside of teaching work, nor do they have to dig out their minds to write** and do everything possible to spend money to publish**, and the evaluation of professional titles will become a matter of course. Second, it is conducive to improving the quality and effectiveness of education and teaching.

In addition to the time and energy dissipated by the evaluation of professional titles, teachers can concentrate on teaching and research work, truly concentrate on teaching work, and truly improve the teaching level, rather than taking the initiative to "show" or "earn performance" for the purpose of evaluating professional titles, so as to truly improve the teaching effect. Third, it is conducive to harmonious relationships between teachers and colleagues, forming a united and cooperative education and teaching ecology, and promoting the development of education and teaching. In the past, in order to promote professional titles and evaluate excellence, it is not an exaggeration to say that teachers compete for "head breaking, chickens flying and dogs jumping", and some people still stare at others every day to see if there is any fraud, favoritism, which affects the relationship between colleagues that should be united and cooperative, and destroys the education and teaching ecology.

Fourth, it is conducive to reducing the pressure on school leaders and educators in evaluating professional titles, so that they can concentrate on education and teaching management. In the past, school leaders and educators devoted a lot of energy and time to the evaluation of qualifications and materials for professional titles, and to solve various contradictions between teachers due to the competition for professional titles, which affected the management exploration and innovation of education and teaching. Fifth, it is conducive to the healthy growth of students in a good education and teaching ecology and receive a better education.

School leaders and educators can free up time for teaching management innovation, teachers can concentrate on teaching research, and teachers will improve the quality and effectiveness of teaching, and students will be the ultimate beneficiaries. Hope it helps!

It will lead to a worse educational environment, leading to the emergence of some irresponsible teachers and some very lazy teachers, resulting in a decline in children's academic performance and a serious impact on the quality of teaching.

It is very harmful to the educational environment. It may lead to a lack of desire for work among teachers, which will affect the motivation of the work, and will also lead to a readjustment of the company's structure. Influencing the development of the education industry.

It will make the educational environment very bad, it will also make the educational environment very chaotic, it will also make the educational environment very competitive, it will also make the educational environment very impure, and it will also make the educational environment very unpromising.

This has brought great harm to the education sector, because it is likely to affect the development of teachers, and then it will also affect the salary level of teachers in the workplace, and it will affect the treatment of teachers, so it will also cause great pressure on these teaching staff.

The evaluation of the title of primary and secondary school teachers is directly related to the salary level of the teacher, and the higher the title of the teacher, the better. Then, of course, there will be another system of salary evaluation. It is not yet fully formed, but there are many other occupations that can be used as a reference.

One of the most basic factors, seniority salary, the longer a teacher works, the more teaching skills he has mastered and the knowledge content of the subject he is responsible for will be relatively more perfect, because after a year, there will always be a little progress compared to the previous year, and there will be a job after a year, and the second year is at least incompetent, which is a kind of improvement ability, and the salary level can be appropriately increased according to the working hours of each teacher. For example, the seniority salary will increase by 50 yuan to 100 yuan a year, and the additional year of being a teacher will increase these dollars, which is a basic factor. <>

You can also add the same assessment indicators as the skill assessment in the enterprise, what is the most important job of the teacher, that is, to make the student's grades improve? Students get better scores, take the high school entrance examination and take the college entrance examination will get better results, and enter better schools, which will achieve the purpose of school education. Whether a teacher teaches a student well or not also depends to a large extent on the student's test scores, so a performance appraisal indicator can make the student's average test scoreThe better the student does in the exam, the more money the teacher should get, because the teacher teaches well, the teaching quality is high, and the teacher with a high level should earn more money.

Another part can be the student's evaluation of the teacher, and really put this evaluation on the bright side, so that he can really influence the teacher, rather than simply taking a form. If 40 out of 50 students in a class say that the teacher has a problem with his teaching method and think that he is not teaching well, then do you think there is really no problem with the teacher? If teachers are able to listen carefully to students' opinionsAs much as possible, it is much better to use the methods that students prefer and are interested in.

I think it should be judged by the level of the lectures. After the cancellation of the title, the teacher's lecture level can be regularly checked and scored, which can be used as the standard for salary evaluation.

The workload and work performance can be used to measure the work of teachers, and then refer to the model of the enterprise to determine the performance of teachers, and finally comprehensively evaluate the salary amount.

The salaries of secondary school teachers should be divided according to their teaching age, work attitude, and rating, and they can be distinguished.