Gathering Sunset Red is correct from grammar?

This should be wrong, because if Xiao Hong talks about grammar, this should be about a definite clause.

That's what I think grammatically speaking, and that's true.

If you get together at sunset, grammatically speaking, there is no problem, and you can let it be spoken.

I just checked it for you, and grammatically this is the right direction.

Zhang Juxianghong grammatically speaking, this is to put the subject behind the object, you can understand it as the gathering of sunset red, and then sunset red refers to old age love. Representative words.

Gathering Sunset Red grammatically, right? I still don't think that's right, um, because Sunset Red is referring to an age group.

There is no error in the grammar of Sunset Red Autumn, and the consciousness is also very good.

Strive for sunset red from the grammar, I think it's still correct, you can also check out other grammar.

From the grammatical point of view, the sunset red is better for the elderly, and the distance has a certain effect on the life of the elderly.

For this, I think it should be from the grammar, it should be quite correct, you can take a look at some grammar knowledge.

Gathering in the sunset is long in French, right? This should be said in French, and it can certainly be said as well.

Finally put the table right, I think it should be right, it should be okay, so that you can only give the child why the excitement at the time of installation to lower.

From that grammatical point of view, there is no problem, if the earth is gathered, the problem of sunrise red, there will always be it.

I think this should be right, I think this is okay, grow so big, what else can I do.

Think grammatically it's this, right? This sentence has finally been solved, and it is wrong to finally say it.

I don't think there's much of a problem with this, because of one of his statements.

If you speak French like bustling French, you must talk to this professional to answer such things.

First of all, there is a problem with the grammar of this sentence. The main thing is that the active and passive voices are confused.

It would be nice to modify it like this :

last year,i planted some sunflowers there.

Grammatically and semantically, this sentence is incorrect. "be + past participle" is a passive voice, and the subject is "i" should not be used passively, and the meaning does not make sense. Obviously, it is necessary to remove "was" and use the past tense.

Modify as follows: last year, i planted some

sunflowers there.Or there are some sunflowers planted by me last year

This sentence should say, last year i planted some sunflowers there

Because there is an adverb, it can be placed directly at the end of the sentence.

Right. There is a more flexible position, which can also be placed at the end of the sentence.

No, to come is to come and to repeat.

It can be said that leaders are welcome to visit.

Or come and visit.

No problem with grammar.

It's a bit confusing in meaning. Keeping the main stem of the sentence is a dream to sound the rallying call, and I don't know what you want to express.

wait can be used as a transitive verb, but in modern English, it is generally used as an intransitive verb, in conjunction with words for, to, till, until, etc.

Grammatically, it's fine, but I is rarely added. You can directly use wait a moment or wait for a moment. Because this is mostly used in imperative sentences, since it is a practical sentence, of course, it is in the first person, so me is not necessary.

There is a problem. It should be: wait for me for a momentWait for me a moment.

Or wait for a momentWait a minute.

glad to meet you is generally said when you meet.

glad meeting you is generally the end of the conversation is to say goodbye.

Both statements are true.