Hello, my case has been executed, when will the dishonesty information be cancelled?

If the case is executed but there is no application for revocation, then it may exist, and this can be applied for revocation.

First of all, no matter what region you know the execution case number, you can accurately retrieve it, and if it is a combination of name and identity information, it will be more accurate, so the prerequisite in the query process is to know the above conditions in order to accurately understand, and the region is not restricted.

According to article 10 of the "Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Publication of Information on the List of Judgment Defaulters", "in any of the following circumstances, the people's court shall delete the information on untrustworthiness within three working days:

1) The person subject to enforcement has already performed the obligations set forth in the effective legal documents or the people's court has completed enforcement;

2) The parties have reached an enforcement settlement agreement and the performance has been completed;

3) Where the person applying for enforcement applies in writing to delete information on untrustworthiness, and the people's court reviews and agrees;

4) After the current enforcement procedures are concluded, the person subject to enforcement is inquired into the assets of the person subject to enforcement through the online enforcement inspection and control system two or more times, and no property available for enforcement is found, and the person applying for enforcement or other persons does not provide effective property leads;

5) Where the people's court rules in accordance with law to suspend enforcement of judgment defaulters due to trial supervision or bankruptcy procedures;

6) The people's court rules not to enforce it in accordance with law;

7) The people's court rules to terminate enforcement in accordance with law.

Where there is a time limit for inclusion, the provisions of the preceding paragraph do not apply. Within 3 working days of the completion of the inclusion period, the people's courts shall delete information on untrustworthiness. ”

Legal analysisIt can be seen that after the judgment defaulter has completed the performance of the effective judgment of the people's court and concluded the case, the people's court needs to delete the list of judgment defaulters within three working days.

Legal basis"Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Publication of Information on the List of Judgment Defaulters" Article 10: In any of the following circumstances, the people's court shall delete the information on untrustworthiness within three working days: (1) the person subject to enforcement has already performed the obligations set forth in the effective legal documents or the people's court has completed enforcement; 2) The parties have reached an enforcement settlement agreement and the performance has been completed; 3) Where the person applying for enforcement applies in writing to delete information on untrustworthiness, and the people's court reviews and agrees; (4) After the conclusion of the current enforcement procedure, the person subject to enforcement has made two or more inquiries into the property of the person subject to enforcement through the online enforcement investigation and control system, and no property available for enforcement is found, and the person applying for enforcement or other persons has not provided effective clues on financial and financial distress; 5) Where the people's court rules in accordance with law to suspend enforcement of judgment defaulters due to trial supervision or bankruptcy procedures; 6) The people's court rules not to enforce it in accordance with law; 7) The people's court rules to terminate enforcement in accordance with law.

Where there is a time limit for inclusion, the provisions of the preceding paragraph do not apply. Within 3 working days of the completion of the inclusion period, the people's courts shall delete information on untrustworthiness. After deleting information on untrustworthiness in accordance with the provisions of the first paragraph of this article, where the person subject to enforcement has any of the circumstances provided for in article 1 of these Provisions, the people's court may re-enter them into the list of judgment defaulters.

Where, within 6 months of deleting information on untrustworthiness in accordance with item (3) of the first paragraph of this article, the people's courts are not to support the application for enforcement to include the person subject to enforcement in the list of judgment defaulters.

The removal process after the dishonest person has completed the execution is as follows:

1. Application for removal: If the obligation has been fully performed, an application may be submitted to the court to apply for the removal of the record of untrustworthiness. The application needs to fill in the corresponding **, provide the certificate of completion of execution, compensation certificate and other relevant supporting materials.

2. Waiting for approval: After submitting the application, it is necessary to wait for the approval of the court, and the applicant's performance will generally be reviewed, and approval or rejection will be given as appropriate.

3. Expiration of the publicity period: If the application is approved, the record of the dishonest manuscript will be lifted only after the expiration of the publicity period.

The following information is required for the dismissal of the dishonest person:

1. Identity proof: It is necessary to provide the ID card or other valid documents of the dishonest person to prove his identity.

4. Other supporting materials: According to the actual situation, it is also necessary to provide other relevant supporting materials, such as compensation agreements, mediation agreements, etc., to prove that the untrustworthy person has taken corresponding measures to compensate or resolve disputes.

To sum up, the removal of the record of dishonesty is a relatively complex process, and it is necessary to actively take measures to improve one's credit status and operate in accordance with the regulations. If there are doubts or difficulties, it is advisable to consult a lawyer or consult with the enforcement department.

Legal basis

Article 2 of the Supreme People's Court's Several Provisions on the Publication of Information on the List of Judgment Defaulters.

Where the person subject to enforcement has the circumstances provided for in items 2 through 6 of article 1 of these Provisions, the period for inclusion in the judgment defaulter's name is 2 years. Where the person subject to enforcement uses violence or threats to obstruct or resist enforcement, or has multiple untrustworthy conduct, it may be extended for 1-3 years. Where judgment defaulters actively perform the obligations set forth in effective legal documents or take the initiative to correct untrustworthy conduct, the people's courts may decide to delete information on untrustworthiness in advance.

The list of the untrustworthy that has been closed does not necessarily have to be revoked, and the list of the untrustworthy has been revoked because of the existence of a statutory circumstance, not because the case has been closed. There are statutory circumstances where the person subject to enforcement has already performed the obligations set forth in the effective legal documents or the people's court has completed enforcement; The parties have reached an agreement to enforce the settlement and have completed the performance.

Article 10 of the Supreme People's Court's Several Provisions on the Publication of Information on the List of Judgment Defaulters: In any of the following circumstances, the people's courts shall delete the information on untrustworthiness within 3 working days: (1) The person subject to enforcement has already performed the obligations set forth in the effective legal documents or the people's court has completed enforcement; 2) The parties have reached an enforcement settlement agreement and the performance has been completed; (3) Where the person applying for enforcement applies in writing to delete information on untrustworthiness, and the people's court reviews it and agrees; 4) After the current enforcement procedures are concluded, the person subject to enforcement is inquired into the assets of the person subject to enforcement through the online enforcement inspection and control system two or more times, and no property available for enforcement is found, and the person applying for enforcement or other persons does not provide effective property leads; 5) Where the people's court rules in accordance with law to suspend enforcement of judgment defaulters due to trial supervision or bankruptcy procedures; 6) The people's court rules not to enforce it in accordance with law;

Generally, after the revocation is reversed, it will be able to return to normal immediately. According to the provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the validity period of judgment defaulters, if they meet the requirements for inclusion in the list of judgment defaulters, the validity period is 2 years; If there are situations of obstructing or resisting enforcement by means of violence or threats, and the circumstances are serious or there are multiple untrustworthy conduct, the validity period may be extended by one to three years.

However, as long as the judgment defaulter actively performs the obligations set forth in the effective legal documents, or takes the initiative to correct the untrustworthy conduct, the people's court may decide to delete the information on untrustworthiness in advance. After the person subject to enforcement submits an application for revocation, the court will conduct a review, and if the provisions are met, it will approve the deletion according to the process, which will generally be completed within 3 working days.

If you want to revoke it, you need to meet one of the following conditions:

1.full fulfillment of obligations set forth in the legal instruments in force;

2.An enforcement settlement agreement has been reached with the applicant for enforcement, and the performance has been confirmed by the applicant for enforcement;

3.The people's court ruled in accordance with law to terminate the execution of the land.

The impact of the judgment defaulter is very serious, and not only will he be affected, but his family will also be implicated. Therefore, everyone must pay attention to abiding by the contract and avoid becoming a dishonest person subject to execution.

Legal analysis: According to the legal provisions, after the case enters the final library, some judgment defaulters can indeed be removed from the blacklist of dishonesty.

Legal basis: Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Publication of Information on the Judgment Defaulters List》 Article 7: All levels of people's court shall enter information on the Judgment Defaulters List into the Supreme People's Court's Judgment Defaulters List database, and uniformly release it to the public through the list.

All levels of people's court may, on the basis of the actual conditions of each region, publish the list of judgment defaulters through other means such as newspapers, radio, television, the internet, and court bulletin boards, and may employ press conferences or other methods to periodically announce to the public the implementation of the judgment defaulters list system by that court and the courts in their jurisdiction.

Article 10: In any of the following circumstances, the people's courts shall delete information on untrustworthiness within 3 working days:

1) The person subject to enforcement has already performed the obligations set forth in the effective legal documents or the people's court has completed enforcement;

2) The parties have reached an enforcement settlement agreement and the performance has been completed;

3) Where the person applying for enforcement applies in writing to delete information on untrustworthiness, and the people's court reviews and agrees;

4) After the conclusion of this enforcement procedure, the property of the person subject to enforcement is inquired more than twice through the Mooakhao Network Enforcement Investigation and Control System, and no property available for enforcement is found, and the applicant for enforcement or other persons do not provide valid property clues.

5) Where the people's court rules in accordance with law to suspend enforcement of judgment defaulters due to trial supervision or bankruptcy procedures;

6) The people's court rules not to enforce it in accordance with law;

7) The people's court rules to terminate enforcement in accordance with law.

Where there is a time limit for inclusion, the provisions of the preceding paragraph do not apply. Within 3 working days of the completion of the inclusion period, the people's courts shall delete information on untrustworthiness.

After deleting information on untrustworthiness in accordance with the provisions of the first paragraph of this article, where the person subject to enforcement has any of the circumstances provided for in article 1 of these Provisions, the people's court may re-enter them into the list of judgment defaulters.

Where, in accordance with item (3) of the first paragraph of this article, within 6 months of deleting the blind lead interest on the letter of dishonesty, the applicant for enforcement applies to include the person subject to enforcement in the list of judgment defaulters, the people's court will not support it.

It takes three working days to be eliminated, as specified below:

Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Publication of Information on the List of Judgment Defaulters

Article 10: In any of the following circumstances, the people's courts shall delete information on untrustworthiness within 3 working days:

1) The person subject to enforcement has already performed the obligations set forth in the effective legal documents or the people's court has completed enforcement;

2) The parties have reached an enforcement settlement agreement and the performance has been completed;

3) Where the person applying for enforcement applies in writing to delete information on untrustworthiness, and the people's court reviews and agrees;

4) After the current enforcement procedures are concluded, the person subject to enforcement is inquired into the assets of the person subject to enforcement through the online enforcement inspection and control system two or more times, and no property available for enforcement is found, and the person applying for enforcement or other persons does not provide effective property leads;

5) Where the people's court rules in accordance with law to suspend enforcement of judgment defaulters due to trial supervision or bankruptcy procedures;

6) The people's court rules not to enforce it in accordance with law;

7) The people's court rules to terminate enforcement in accordance with law.

Where there is a time limit for inclusion, the provisions of the preceding paragraph do not apply. Within 3 working days of the completion of the inclusion period, the people's courts shall delete information on untrustworthiness.

The court has concluded the case for more than 15 working days, why is it that the purchase of high-speed rail tickets is still restricted and cannot be issued.

The list of judgment defaulters whose cases have been closed is generally based on the application of the parties, and may be deleted within 3-5 working days after the application is accepted.

For debts to be repaid, as long as the dishonest person fulfills the debt, the party concerned may apply to remove the untrustworthy from the list. After review, the task of the general court is to apply for compliance with the regulations, and will approve the deletion according to the process, and determine the deletion to the deletion, which can be completed in about 1-2 days.

According to article 7 of the "Several Provisions", the people's court shall delete the relevant information of the judgment defaulter from the database of the list of judgment defaulters in the following three circumstances:

full fulfillment of obligations set forth in the legal instruments in force;

An enforcement settlement agreement is reached with the person applying for enforcement, and the person applying for enforcement confirms that the performance has been completed;

The court rules to terminate enforcement in accordance with law.

Grandma's, it's been several years since the court closed the case, why hasn't it been removed from the list of dishonesty?