What to make of the statement that no one in the arena remembers the runner up ?

I don't think this sentence really says that no one remembers the runner-up, on the contrary, this sentence is a motivating word, although the champion in the arena is more eye-catching, but this is also a step away for the runner-up, if you want people to remember it, then you have to work hard, so I think this sentence can also be regarded as full of positive energy.

In the arena, it is also important to pay attention to the success and defeat, everyone will only remember the first place, no matter how close the second place results are to the first place, it will not help, there is only one champion.

From another point of view, this sentence is actually an inspiring word, encouraging competitors to have a fighting spirit and perseverance, break through themselves in the competition, and achieve better results. <>

The meaning of this sentence is that the essence of competitive competition is perseverance and the spirit of hard work, and the rest is not so important. As long as you can do your best in the game and make your own efforts, you are respected, and no one will despise you, which is worthy of our respect.

No one in the arena remembers the runner-up" sounds a little strange, but when you think about it, there is some truth to it.

The champion and runner-up can only be decided at the last moment of the competition, and the attention of the whole audience at this moment will be on the champion, and the champion is the absolute focus. At this time, the ** will also quickly turn the camera to the champion, and both the prize and the treatment of the champion are higher than the runner-up. As a result, the runner-up will receive much less attention comparatively speaking.

But after all, there is only one champion, and everyone's efforts deserve our recognition.

I personally agree with this sentence, and it is true, just like the old saying: there is no first in literature, and there is no second in martial arts. As a competitive sport, the only criterion is the quality of the performance, the first place is to receive all the honors and praise, to leave a deep impression, and the second place is difficult to remember.

I think that's a very correct statement. I don't think anyone in the arena really remembers who the runner-up is, people only remember who the champion is and how good they are in which series, so it's very appropriate to say that the winner is the winner in the arena. So, we have to try to win the championship and let others remember it.

Actually, I don't agree with this statement, it is nothing more than trying to motivate myself and my teammates to burst into the best potential and strive to win the championship. Maybe the ** report is more focused on the champion, so there is such a statement.

In addition to champions in the arena, people will also remember those who do not admit defeat and fight tenaciously, and those who are of high moral character will also be remembered. We have to work tirelessly to achieve the championship goal, but we also have to respect sportsmanship.

I don't think that the second place is the biggest loser, if you say that everyone has done their best for this competition, to do the best they can, even if it is the second place, I think it should also be respected, whether it is remembered by others or not, at least it is unforgettable and meaningful for the participants, I think it is very worthwhile, I personally think that people should live for themselves, don't care too much about other people's words.

No one in the arena remembers the idea of the runner-up, I think it is very correct, because the first is the first in the civil and military affairs, and there is no second in the martial arts, since it is a sports competition, then it is necessary to put strength first and go all out.

A friend of mine, this is the point of view, no matter what the game is very dedicated, Sou Nian will never give others water, strive to win the first, there are some unimportant games, we have also persuaded him to release a little water, not so important, but he said that this is his belief, no one will remember the runner-up, so as long as the hunger is cracked in the arena, then you must win the championship, listening to my friend's words, I think what he said is very reasonable, no one in the arena remembers the runner-up.

In high school, the teacher told us a story. The teacher asked us if we knew which peak was the highest peak in the world. We all say it's Mount Everest.

The teacher asked what the second peak was, and we didn't know. Similarly, in the competitive field, people only remember the first but do not remember, and the second principle is the same.

The first is with a light oak ring, the first has only one, the first stands out from many competitors, with the glory of the winner, is the embodiment of super strength, has a strong charm that attracts people's worship, and is naturally more likely to attract people's attention. Even if there is only a little gap between the second and the first, but the slightest mistake is a simple group, and the first and second are often the difference between excellence and excellence. Even if there is a slight difference between the second and the first, it is still unknown.

I think it makes sense that no one in the arena remembers the runner-up, because the first place is always glamorous, and the runner-up and third runner-up are overshadowed by the comparison between the champion and the buried skin, and the same is true in my class, the teacher can only remember two kinds of people, one is the best student in the class, and the other is the worst student in the class, so I think the point of view that no one in the arena remembers the runner-up is very correct.

I don't think anyone in the arena will remember the runner-up argument, which is very wrong. Because the runner-up also won the bronze medal. Although the team is not as good as the champion, it is also the second in the world, as people say.

When I was in high school, my class won the runner-up in the long-distance running competition, but our class was very recognized by the director, and my classmates praised our Buzi class as very good. So it's very wrong to say that I don't think the runner-up is remembered.

First of all, for the current fast-moving consumer era, people can only remember the champion, and even the champion can't remember clearly, so it is even more difficult to expect the runner-up to be remembered.

But I don't think that second place is the biggest loser, but if you say that everyone did their best to do the best they could. Hu Heng belt.

Even though it's second place, I think it should be respectable, whether it's remembered or not, at least it's memorable and meaningful for the participants, and I think it's worth it.