Why is photography forbidden on furniture? Why is photography forbidden in the courtroom?

First of all, it's definitely not bad for furniture, the flash can shake the furniture, and the furniture can't see the sun at home!

According to the summary of several years of work experience in the Meilunmei Warehouse Furniture Center, it should be like this:

You can find the same style by taking a photo, you must know that the furniture industry is not so transparent, and there is a lot of moisture in it. After taking pictures, go to other furniture cities to compare, and after shopping around, the ** gap will come out, so will you still buy expensive ones? Or you can ask other friends, in case there is really someone who knows, not only the brand, but all the details have been investigated; Finally, the shopping software of the e-commerce platform is very powerful, and the price is cheap, so finding the same one is a breeze.

In the final analysis, it's still a matter of opacity, and we shoot it casually here, because if you don't shoot, you may not be able to find this piece of furniture for a while.

It is true that there is nothing to do with the fear of being imitated, not to mention the furniture, even the lamps and lanterns are the same, hehehe, that time, a few of our designers went to the lighting store to see a few lamps and lanterns, and wanted to take pictures, and brought ** to the customer to see the results

Because I was afraid of imitation, I was not allowed to shoot.

You're talking about the furniture in the city, so you just need to have a rough idea. So isn't it up to you to imitate it? Everybody is like this.,People still need to sell it.。。

In order to protect the privacy of the parties, even in court, as long as the judge does not pronounce the verdict and convict, he is still a criminal suspect. The West believes that the law should pay attention to human rights, even if a criminal has his own rights, and the law can only punish him for the crime he committed. The fact that the court is a serious place should not engage in commercial interests in this situation is not accepted by Western jurisprudence.

Therefore, cameras and cameras are not allowed in Western courts, and we often see reporters waiting outside the courthouse to take pictures, just out of compliance with the regulations.

Maybe it's more vivid and hand-painted.

One is for religious reasons;

second, anti-flash lights and other damage to cultural relics and natural resources;

Third, for copyright and cultural relics security considerations, photography is not allowed. Some exhibition halls in museums prohibit taking pictures, mainly for four reasons.

First, from the perspective of copyright. Because some of the temporary exhibition halls exhibit cultural relics from private collections; On the other hand, the exhibition form of the museum is designed by the museum staff themselves, and labor has been paid. If it is photographed, it will be imitated by other units and individuals, which will damage the interests of the museum.

Second, proceed from the purpose of cultural relics protection. Cultural relics such as calligraphy and paintings, silk and so on are easily damaged by flashing light waves.

Third, proceed from the purpose of security. Someone completely photographed the orientation and structure of the exhibition hall, which provided convenient conditions for criminals to commit crimes.

Fourth, in order to ensure the visiting environment. Some people will let others move and let others move in order to take pictures, and a tripod will take time, which will also cause inconvenience to others. Of course, most cultural relics such as sculptures, bronzes, ceramics, seals and other exhibits that are not easily damaged by sunlight are allowed to be photographed.

Individual artifacts that are not allowed to be photographed are generally not interfered with if visitors do not use flash. In fact, if visitors only need some cultural relics to take pictures, many museums have exquisite albums, and other museums generally have them.

Tong Mingkang pointed out that many of the rules and regulations of China's museums were formed under the conditions of a planned economy, and some of them lack rationality today, but they have not been changed accordingly. The main reasons for the museum's ban on taking pictures are to protect cultural relics and protect copyright, but Tong Mingkang said that the Louvre has never forbidden visitors to take pictures because they have done experiments to illuminate cultural relics hundreds of thousands of times with flash, and the degree of damage is almost zero. However, in some museums in China, once they find that there are tourists taking pictures, they will shout loudly, and even tear people's films, and there are even absurd regulations that "it is strictly forbidden to touch glass", which directly affects the enthusiasm of the audience.

Don't even let you take pictures, is the service in place? Tong Mingkang pointed out that museums can no longer use the excuse of protecting cultural relics and intellectual property rights to refuse the reasonable requests of tourists.

The state is afraid of the leakage of cultural relics, counterfeiting, etc.

You can take pictures, but if you take a picture, will others see it in person?

1. The flash will harm the cultural relics, for the purpose of protecting the cultural relics.

2. For security purposes.

3. For the purpose of preventing counterfeiting.

The flash of the camera is damaging to the exhibits. Others don't want outsiders to see it.

Generally speaking, there are three reasons: one is religious reasons, the second is the damage to cultural relics and natural resources caused by anti-flash, and the third is that photography is not allowed due to copyright and cultural relics security considerations.

Many cultural relics and scenic spots, many places have "no photography" signs, sometimes I feel like I run all the way away, and I can't take a few ** as a commemoration, which is a pity. There are many friends who do not understand this kind of regulation, do not pat **, and do not touch the cultural relics, should not cause damage to the cultural relics.

The main reason why photography is not allowed in some places is that the flash will damage the artifacts when taking pictures. In fact, most of China's ancient buildings are wooden, easy to damage, and the paint on them is also easy to fade and fall off. Therefore, it is generally forbidden to take pictures.

The ordinary wavelength of visible light is between 400 nm and 700 nm, and the ultraviolet light below 400 nm has a large energy and is easily absorbed by the object, thus causing the object to deteriorate; The infrared energy higher than 700 nanometers is small, and it is not easy to be absorbed by objects, which is very safe. Wood, plants, silk and other substances are all polymer structures, containing cellulose or protein, which are easily affected by light, electricity, and bacteria and deteriorate and damage; Other substances such as stone, copper, iron, and ceramics are not easily affected by light. The flash models we use vary from long to short wavelengths.

However, it should be less than 700 nanometers of visible light, which is more or less destructive to the cultural relics of the polymer structure. Therefore, wooden buildings, calligraphy and paintings, silk products, murals and other cultural relics should be prohibited from using flash to take pictures.

From the point of view of the protection of cultural relics. In the first half of 1999, the State Administration of Cultural Heritage will issue a new notice on the management of cultural relics, film and television, and filming. In fact, for cultural relics, the State Administration of Cultural Heritage only carries out macro management from the policy and regulations, and the specific management work is that the provincial and municipal cultural relics units manage according to the different circumstances of the cultural relics without violating the unified national laws and regulations.

Let's talk about the issue of prohibiting photography, the State Administration of Cultural Heritage only makes regulations on a large scale, such as calligraphy and painting, silk fabrics, murals, lacquered wood and other cultural relics, which are easy to fade by the light, causing damage to cultural relics, and in principle, they are not allowed to be photographed. However, it is impossible to specify which cultural relics can be photographed and which cultural relics cannot be photographed; Which cultural relics can be photographed and which ones can't. Of course, without flash, it may not cause damage to the cultural relics, but I dare not say that you can definitely shoot without flash.

There may be some special circumstances for cultural relics and attractions, which are related to copyright and material issues.

Now Weibo has made some leaders deeply jealous, so be cautious!

People are officials, and things that are unfavorable to others will definitely not happen.

Neither can IKEA.

Yesterday I went to IKEA to take pictures and was blocked by all kinds of blocks, I was shocked, IKEA was not like this before.

And what's even more ridiculous is that there is also a scene in it that makes people take pictures and post them on Moments!

Anyway, if you beg me to shoot in the future, I won't go.

First of all, furniture stores, especially brand furniture stores, the first is to protect the intellectual property rights of product design, and secondly, in order not to let customers have too much comparison, because the price of products in the furniture market is uneven, and the factory outside IKEA's products cannot do those quantities, so the price cannot be controlled, and the quality of IKEA is notoriously bad, and it is sold for customer experience, space atmosphere, and matching.