In the Ali case, the wife surnamed Zhang spoke out again, can she refute the former Ali female emplo

Can't refute the former Ali female employee, although the wife surnamed Zhang pointed out a lot of problems this time, but people's trust in her has greatly declined, and ** has mastered and confirmed the evidence, for her this time, everyone thinks that it basically does not play a big role.

It is possible that because this person has already made relevant statements and has ** relevant evidence, adding to the real hammer of this case.

The strengthening of awareness of the legal system is a manifestation of the continuous development of society, but even today, there are still many people who ignore the dignity of the law. I thought that as long as I was hidden enough, I could escape the punishment of the law. According to the ** report, Ali had employees who committed illegal acts against female employees in the company, and the company did not give corresponding explanations and punishments, and still let the suspect be in a high position in the company.

The employee who committed the abuse and the way the company handled it are not unpleasant. What's even more striking is that after the case was investigated, the suspect's wife stood up for the suspect. The three views expressed in the words are unbearable.

Why is the suspect still defended From the verbal expression of the suspect's wife, we can see thatShe is still defending her husband, a suspect. The wife kept saying that although her husband had committed a crime, he had not done so for no reason. I can't help but reflect on whether the mistakes of others are the reason for my own crimes.

And what evidence does she have to prove that the victim is at fault? I have to say that there is always this kind of blind maintenance of family members in a family, whether it is black or white, the family will break up sooner or later.

Why doesn't the company give the relevant punishment According to the victim's statement, this suspect has committed a criminal act more than onceAnd after the victim reacted to the company, no one from the company gave a corresponding reply. Perhaps it is this kind of measure that makes criminal suspects more and more emboldened and lose more and more reverence for the law. The purpose of the company's operation is to make profits, but the company's leaders should also know that the reason why a company can come to this day is because of the efforts of employees, the support of consumers, and the management of the company's leaders.

In today's commercial society, consumer reputation is one of the keys to whether a company can operate.

What should we do in the face of infringement, maybe we have not been violated, but if the people around us are violated, we must let them take up the law and maintain social fairness and justice. We must believe that justice will come eventually.

The reasons for what happened, the situation explained, the wife's attitude, the middle experience, and the specific reasons for the wife's voice, these information are all of great concern to many people.

1.The findings of this matter, 2The people involved in this matter, 3Job requirements in the company, 4The situation of the family, 5Subsequent settlement results.

There is a lot of information worth paying attention to in this case, for example, some lies of this female employee have been exposed, and many of her words have some doubts, and at the same time, the wife of this suspect also stood up to speak for him, saying that these things are not true, saying that her husband did not do such an act, saying that her husband was framed, and there are still many suspicious places in this case, and further investigation is needed.

Recently, there have been more and more reversals in the assault case of Ali's female employees that shocked the whole network, and the brother-in-law of one of the suspects surnamed Zhang also revealed more information in the interview. Among them, the most noteworthy are the following three points:1. The victim Zhou had looked for the suspect Zhang the next day; 2. There is no violation as stated by the victim Zhou in **; 3. The victim Zhou took the initiative to delete WeChat and then asked to add it back

First of all, although the victim Zhou released a lot of details at that time, many things were obviously deliberately hidden by her. Suspect Zhang's brother-in-law said that on the morning of the second day after the incident, Zhou took the initiative to find the suspect Zhang to go to his hotel room, and the victim Zhou was not denouncing or questioning the suspect Zhang, but sent a WeChat message to ask the suspect Zhang if he could come over to accompany him, which did not look like the relationship between the violation and the violation.

Secondly, there were also a lot of ** at the dinner at that time, according to the victim Zhou's statement, the suspect Zhang took the initiative to hold down the head of the victim Zhou and forcibly pressed Zhou on his shoulder, but the ** that circulated showed that the victim Zhou was lying on the lap of the suspect Zhang, and the suspect Zhang's hands did not even touch Zhou, so Zhou's expression seemed to be contrary to the real situation, and for a while, everyone didn't know who to believe.

Finally, on the morning of the second day after the incident, the victim Zhou took the initiative to delete WeChat with the suspect Zhang in the room, but in the afternoon of the same day, Zhou took the initiative to add Zhang's WeChat, and asked Zhang if he touched himself last night after adding WeChat.

I think this incident will be reversed, because the focus is on the new evidence, from the perspective of monitoring and **, Zhou was absolutely desperate to take the initiative to make physical contact with Zhang throughout the whole process.

There are three information points worth paying attention to, the first is that the victim Zhou took the initiative to find the suspect Zhang the next day, and expressed the hope that Zhang could go over to accompany her, which does not look like the relationship between infringement and violation. Souzhou The second is that there is no violation of the victim Zhou in the chaos, and it seems that Zhou is taking the initiative to cater to it; The third is that the victim Zhou took the initiative to delete WeChat and then asked to add it back, which feels very purposeful and is suspected of creating evidence.