Why are there so many disputes between the United States and Britain when they agree on the strategy

Updated on military 2024-06-21
10 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    After a number of meetings, a strategic decision was made to put Europe first and then Asia to maintain Britain's position in the Mediterranean. Because he met the needs of the UK, it has been a constant controversy, and from this time on. So the two countries often disagree, and quarrels are a regular thing.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    It is fundamentally inseparable from where the best interests lie, and both sides are considering the maximization of their own interests, so it is natural that there will be constant disputes.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    The two countries discussed the strategic policy of Europe first and then Asia, but there were constant debates, also because the war situation in Europe at that time was very unfavorable, and Asia urgently needed the support of Britain and the United States.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    On January 29 and March 27, 1941, representatives of the American and British Staffs held a joint meeting in Washington to adopt the "AB" plan. The plan stipulates that, in accordance with the strategic principle of "Europe first and Asia later" determined by the two sides, if Japan launches an offensive, the military strategy of the United States and Britain in the Far East is to adopt a defensive position and "adopt a containment war of attrition against Japan before Germany is defeated." Accordingly, the United States stipulates that the main task of its Pacific Fleet is defense, ensuring the inviolability of places such as Hawaii, the Philippines, ** and Wake Island.

    In addition, in order to relieve the pressure on the British forces on the Malayan defense line, the fleet was to use submarines to sabotage Japan's sea lines of communication and take pincer operations in the Marshall Islands and Caroline Islands.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Because the UK itself is located in Europe, the geographical location is relatively large from Europe. Asia is further away from Europe. Therefore, it is in line with the strategic and political needs of the United Kingdom, as well as the mode of economic development.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Geographical location is determined. Britain must first ensure its own strategic security in Europe, and it is considering its strategy in Asia, because Asia is far away from them.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Because he felt that in terms of Britain's war strength at that time, it was imperative to deal with Germany in Europe first, and Japan in Asia was not so tricky.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Because Britain is a typical European country, this strategy of "Europe first and then Asia" has benefited Britain a lot.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Britain is closer in Europe. Britain is too close in Europe, and it directly threatens the security of Britain itself, and only when Europe is stabilized can it have the energy to deal with Asia.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    It does not consider the recovery of Burma to be a top priority, but only aims to stabilize India, so it is reluctant to mobilize naval and air forces for Burma.

Related questions
36 answers2024-06-21

Syria's foreign minister has publicly warned the United States and Turkey because the United States and Turkey are joining forces to flex their muscles in the Syrian region. And to replace Syria ** to do the resettlement of the Syrian people. This is a complete interference in the internal affairs of Syria. >>>More

12 answers2024-06-21

The formal establishment of diplomatic relations between China and the United States was the Joint Communiqué on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations between the People's Republic of China and the United States of America ("Sino-US Communiqué on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations") signed on January 1, 1979 >>>More