Asking for money is the root of all evil?

Money is not the root of all evil. For money cannot cover all the evils of the world. According to anthropological research, we know that there are four main types of evil, and three of them have nothing to do with money.

1.The root of all evil is not money.

2.People are the initiators of action and can take responsibility for everything they do.

3.If money can be used to do good, then it is no longer the root of all evil.

Money is controlled by people, so people are the root of all evil. ”

** Paying salaries to civil servants - the root of all evil, is it dragging the people into the abyss of all evil? ”

You say that money is the root of all evil, but if there is no money, there is no sin? ”

Money is limited, so unlimited desires cannot be satisfied at all, money itself is a tool, but in reality, it has become a god that people worship, money can confuse right and wrong, and turn things upside down, so money is the root of all evil.

Money as a general equivalent is a special kind of being, it is a representation of the resources of society, which society needs to exchange for goods.

In any case, money is also indispensable for anyone. If a person has no money, it is like an empty sack that can never stand up straight.

Analyze the debate, whether money is the root of all evil, and can be analyzed as whether the evil caused by money is the root of all evil, then the opposite side can stand on "the cause of the source of all evil is not necessarily money", and then give examples of crimes caused by other reasons, and finally conclude that "xx is the root of all evil". And you have a premise that "all evil" refers to the vast majority or all of them, and that both sides have to have a debate on the same level. Furthermore, there must be a definition of "evil", what exactly is "evil"?

As the old saying goes, don't take evil as small, so if a small evil is evil, then is it okay to throw garbage anywhere? If the positive side thinks that it counts, then this example is a slap in the face, and throwing garbage everywhere has nothing to do with money, right? In fact, the most powerful explanation is to list the data, find the proportion of various cases in the country, compare, you can come to a very intuitive conclusion, I hope mine is helpful to you.

Money is the embodiment of order, and disorder will bring destruction.

Copper doesn't stink, what stinks is people's hearts, what stinks is people's desires that can never be satisfied, and it is the insatiable greed that you and I can never satisfy.

A person's quality is determined by quality and has nothing to do with money.

Summary. Okay, thank you, Chairman, after the development of the commodity economy and the determination of the status of money, money has become a thing whose value no one in the world has doubted, and the use of money as a tool to measure value has almost become a rational choice, that is, the so-called instrumental rationality. But those who feel that money is the devil are just unaware of, or unwilling to realize the instrumentality of money.

I still like the description of money in Puppy Qian Qian, although I can't remember the original text for many years, I think it's still very appropriate: money is a magnifying glass, magnifying human nature.

Money is not the root of all evil Four Arguments.

Is money the root of all evil The four arguments are opposed.

Well, thank you, Chairman, after the development of the commodity economy and the determination of the status of money, money has become something whose value no one in the world has doubted, and the use of money as a tool to measure value has almost become a rational choice, that is, the pure argument of instrumental rationality. But those who think that money is the devil are just unaware, or those who are lacking do not want to realize the instrumentality of money. I still like the description of money in the puppy money, although I can't remember the original text for many years, I think it's still very appropriate:

Money is a magnifying glass that magnifies the humanity of Silly Ling.

The way of man, the loss is not enough to give more than enough. At the same time, Lao Tzu pointed out that human society is greedy and selfish. This also reveals the relationship between the rich and the poor in society.

Human desires are limitless, there is no most, only more. The capitalist ruthlessly exploits the laborers, although the rich are still for money, but they use the money to meet their various needs in life. The capitalists continue to obtain surplus value, and the gap between the rich and the poor is constantly widening.

Some poor people sin because they are irrational and break away from the shackles of morality, although their purpose is money, but they still get money to meet their own living needs. In the final analysis, it is the dissatisfaction of the poor with the status quo of life, which they only achieve through morally wrong means. People don't go to work to make money for the sake of money, but to survive, so that the letter chooses to work to get paid.

Money is not the source of evil, money is only a catalyst at most, the evil in human nature is inherently existent, and most people choose money as a "scapegoat".

We live in a pluralistic society, and in a pluralistic society, there are no values that must be upheld. Is it morality, or is it utilitarianism that forcibly promotes its own values in the name of "money is the root of all evil"? Modern society is indeed an era of pluralistic values, but there must be some values that need to be adhered to in any era, and we must get a glimpse of the evil of human nature from it.

Since it is a fourth debate, it is recommended to summarize the offense and defense according to the focus and weak points of the battlefield.

If you have any questions, you can also ask.

Money is limited, so unlimited desires cannot be satisfied at all, money itself is a tool, but in reality, it has become a god that people worship, money can confuse right and wrong, and turn things upside down, so money is the root of all evil.

Money as a general equivalent is a special kind of existence, it is a representative of the resources of society, which needs it to exchange for goods, but its benefits are nothing more. And its magic makes people commit crimes, and there are many examples.

In the Western Chinese language, money talks translates as money speaks.

Philosophy sees the self-reflection on this topic: -- Anyone, as long as he is not a wreck, will have to choose. The name is illusory, and the benefit is real.

He who says that money is evil, because he does not have it. Some people say: Money is a god.

Some people say: Money is evil. But no matter what you say, money is also something that no one can live without.

If a person has no money, it is like an empty sack that will never be able to stand up straight. The Dialectic of Money and Love: In the world of love, it seems that only love can make two people truly happy.

However, love is an illusory thing after all, without love, people can still live, and without money, it is difficult to survive. Now, in the face of the economic era, people are more and more soberly aware that love also needs money to escort it.