Russia claims that Siberian Power 2 can replace Nord Stream 2, will Nord Stream 2 be scrapped?

Personally, I don't think "Nord Stream 2" will be abandoned, because "Nord Stream 2", which was built at so much cost, why did it have to be abandoned? "Siberian Power-2" and "Nord Stream 2" again did not conflict.

How to say it, "Nord Stream 2" is unlikely to be abandoned by Russia. Because for Russia, the so-called "Siberian Power-2" can replace "Nord Stream 2", but in terms of the amount of natural gas delivered, it does not mean that "Nord Stream 2" is not used directly. "Power of Siberia-2" is to deliver gas to our country, and "Nord Stream-2" is to deliver gas to Germany.

As far as Russia's natural gas extraction is concerned, it can fully support the simultaneous opening of the two gas transmission pipelines "Power of Siberia-2" and "Nord Stream 2", and if the two gas transmission pipelines "Power of Siberia-2" and "Nord Stream 2" can be used together to make money, then why doesn't Russia use them both? Why scrap it? "Nord Stream 2" has not yet been used.

One thing to say, unless there is no more gas to be extracted in Russia, it is impossible to scrap Nord Stream 2, because through the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, huge profits can be obtained from Europe. Let's not always think about choosing one of the two, people in Russia are not really stupid enough to spend billions of dollars to build the "Nord Stream-2" abandoned before it has been activated, this is all real gold**, it's just because "Nord Stream-2" can't be activated now, so it is temporarily placed there, if there is a chance to enable "Nord Stream-2", Russia will definitely be the first to enable it. It's like if you have two pairs of pants, will you keep only one and throw away the other?

Why can't you stay both, it doesn't matter to you.

In general, "Nord Stream 2" is unlikely to be scrapped, because Russia still needs this to extract profits from Europe, and Russia has the ability to guarantee "Siberian Power-2" and "Nord Stream 2".at the same time.

I think it may be scrapped because Power of Siberia-2 is the second major pipeline project agreement to send gas from Siberia to China, and it is an important signal to transfer gas to China.

It should be scrapped, there is already a better one than him, then I will always use something better, and this model may be replaced.

It is reported that the Sino-Russian gas pipeline project "Power of Siberia-2", which will start construction in 2024, may replace the currently suspended "Nord Stream-2" pipeline.

The Power of Siberia-2 gas pipeline to China can actually replace the uncertified Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline to Europe.

Russia intends to replace "Nord Stream 2" with "Siberia 2", and if the plan is completed, Europe will completely enter a double harsh winter of economy and life!

The Sino-Russian gas pipeline project "Power of Siberia-2", which will start construction in 2024, is designed to transport about 50 billion cubic meters of gas per year, slightly lower than the 55 billion cubic meters of Nord Stream 2. It may replace the currently suspended Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

As a commodity, natural gas has special characteristics for its transportation and consumption. Although it is impossible for Europe to find a "replacement" for Russian gas in a short period of time, Russia will not be able to find a natural gas market to replace Europe immediately. The news of the imminent start of construction of the "Power of Siberia-2" pipeline has only political significance, at least for the time being, and has no substantive effect.

Vice Chancellor Novak is tantamount to bankrupting Chancellor Merkel's plan for the revival of Germany, which has cost Chancellor Merkel a lot of effort and billions of euros!

The Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline is the main artery that will maintain the economic development of Germany and even Western European countries for the next two decades! Germany, France....There are several other countries in the western part of the European continent are energy-deficient countries, and are production-oriented countries (basically manufacturing-based economies), the current industrial profits are so thin, can only be repeated control of costs, if the energy ** climbs then the enterprise has no profit at all, and it will not be able to maintain production, followed by bankruptcy, unemployment, relief and the resulting economic recession! Europe's last misfortune must be its own, and the vacancy that will arise "after the fall of Europe" will be filled by countries with strong manufacturing industries!

In addition, with the opening of this pipeline, Russian gas will account for more than 10% of our natural gas**, and perhaps 20%. From an energy security point of view, that's the most it is, no more. No matter how much it is, we also run the risk of being stuck by Russia.

The great changes unseen in a century, this time is a big test for any country, the slightest carelessness will withdraw from the core of the world stage, there are protagonists who have become supporting roles, the key depends on how you meet the big test.

This means that the winter in Europe may be slightly better, and natural resources can be transmitted through the power of Siberia, and it will not be so cold.

This means that Nord Stream 2 is not the only one, and no one will care about it anymore if there is a replacement.

This is a big change, and it makes people feel that this future is still a big problem, not good.

The goal of Nord Stream 2 is to supply 55 billion cubic meters of gas per year to EU countries through the Baltic Sea and Germany. It is expected that by the end of 2019, Germany's gas imports from Russia could double.

The goal of Nord Stream 2 is to lay a gas pipeline from Russia to Germany through the Baltic Sea seabed, bypassing Ukraine to transport Russian gas to Germany, and then to other European countries through the German trunk pipeline.

It's too far from Siberia, still from the European part of Russia.

Yes, how do you know.