-
If the student refuses to go to school, then the teacher has a certain responsibility to persuade him to return, but the student is obligated to go to school.
-
If you're asking about primary and secondary school students, it's important to understand that the Compulsory Education Law gives teenagers the right to go to school, but there is no mandatory provision that deprives students of the freedom not to go to school. In some places, there may be performance indicators for the compulsory education popularization rate, so the relevant departments will instruct the school to take action, which may eventually be implemented by the corresponding teachers to persuade them to return, which constitutes a de facto responsibility.
Actually, I think that persuasion should be more of a conscious act based on the teacher's morality, after all, persuading a child to return to the path of life that is appropriate for his age is a good deed, you say?
-
Hello, if the student refuses to go to school, it is the teacher's responsibility to persuade him to return. However, if the teacher's persuasion is not effective, it can be reported to the school.
-
If the student is still a primary school student or a junior high school student, the school has the obligation to persuade him to return, because our country has nine-year compulsory education, but if the student is junior high school or above, it is the teacher's own will to persuade him to return.
-
If the student refuses to go to school, the teacher has no responsibility to persuade him to return. That's your own business, and it has nothing to do with the teacher.
-
When students refuse to go to school, teachers still have a certain responsibility to go. This is the professional ethics of the teacher.
-
Responsible, because it is a nine-year compulsory education.
-
I don't support persuasion, I think there must be some reason for a student to reject the teacher, and I think the teacher should help the student find the problem. It would be irresponsible for students to dissuade them like this.
-
The profession of a teacher is a work of conscience, and it all depends on personal ideas whether there is responsibility or not.
-
In compulsory education, it is illegal for teachers to dissuade students.
According to Article 24 of the "Compulsory Education Law of the People's Republic of China", schools shall establish and improve safety systems and emergency response mechanisms, conduct safety education for students, strengthen management, promptly eliminate hidden dangers, and prevent accidents. Local people at or above the county level regularly inspect the safety of school buildings; For those that need to be repaired or transformed, they shall be repaired and transformed in a timely manner. Schools must not employ persons who have been lawfully deprived of their political rights for intentional crimes, or who are otherwise unfit to engage in compulsory education work, to serve as staff.
Article 27: Schools shall criticize and educate students who violate the school management system, and must not expel them.
-
Note: It is not right to do so if it is compulsory and the student can disobey this advice from the teacher. If it is high school or university, it depends on the student's own wishes, and if the student agrees to withdraw from school, it is okay, and if the student does not agree to withdraw from school, then the teacher cannot force the student to withdraw from school.
At present, there is no explicit law that it is illegal for teachers to dissuade students, but this is wrong and should be condemned! )
-
Maybe I may think that this answer is not good, but it is true. You can be persuaded to quit. This is also the reason why many students transfer schools.
People who don't know may say, I am a student, and I should have the right to receive an education. Yes, there is education to accept, but it does not mean that all situations are okay, and students and teachers who repeatedly violate the rules and make mistakes can not accept it.
The Education Law is different from other laws, the Constitution stipulates that the ownership of education belongs to the Education Bureau, and the Education Bureau has a special right to implement and change the Education Law. In this school, it can be said that the teachers are basically afraid to accept it.
-
I don't think the punishment is too much, because the student is very excessive, and without the slightest lesson, it will only make him make mistakes again.
-
The child is persuaded to quit school for confronting the teacher in class, such a punishment is indeed too much, and the child is still in the nine-year compulsory education stage, and the teacher has no right to let the child withdraw from school, which is illegal.
-
Be. This behavior of the child can be corrected through education, and there is no need to dissuade him from school.
-
I think it is possible that this child is very bad at contradicting the teacher, and even the language is very bad, so he will be dissuaded, and a student like this can be dissuaded, because he will not only affect the learning of other students, but also affect the teacher's life in the future.
-
If you are persuaded to drop out of school, the punishment may be a little excessive. Because school is a place where children are taught and nurtured, children who are exposed to problems need to be taught and helped to correct, rather than being dissuaded because of problems.
-
Yes, because there is no need to drop out of school in this situation, and if the child does not obey the discipline, he should also let the child go home and reflect on himself.
-
Yes. It's too heavy, students will always make some mistakes, the teacher just corrects it in time, there is no need to punish it so heavily.
-
It is true that the punishment is too much, although it is a bad behavior for the child to confront the teacher, but the school should still focus on the education method.
-
Such a punishment must be too heavy, after all, the child just contradicted the teacher, and there is no need to directly let the child withdraw from school.
-
The punishment is still very excessive, although the child does wrong, but the child should not be expelled, which has a great impact on the child's life.
-
It is true that there will be some excesses, because the children at this stage are more rebellious, and the teacher should take the right approach to educate the children.
-
I think it's too much, and I will be persuaded to quit if I contradict the teacher, so the teacher is not a relation, and it is not allowed to persuade me to quit within the scope of compulsory education, so I suggest giving feedback to the Education Bureau.
-
If you don't want to be dissuaded and want to continue your studies, you can talk to a counselor, or talk to the leadership of the hospital, and show that you want to go to school, you must be sincere, if it is because of insufficient credits, then even repeating a grade is better than dropping out. I was about to be dissuaded from school for some reason, so the next step is to cherish the opportunity to go to school.
Generally speaking, if the circumstances are not particularly serious, you still want to go to school, and your parents have interceded with the teacher, and the teacher will open up for the sake of your sincere and sincere repentance.
Introduction: At present, nine-year compulsory education schools, six years of primary school and three years of junior high school, except for major violations of discipline (such as violating national laws, endangering national interests, etc.), are not allowed to be dissuaded.
In the three years of high school, because it is not within the scope of the national compulsory education regulations, the school has the right to persuade students to quit, and under normal circumstances, the school will deal with them appropriately according to the students' disciplinary violations in one semester or one year, and students will be persuaded to quit if they exceed a certain bottom line. In some cities and counties, the management of high schools will strictly pledge funds, and then deal with them after a period of observation.
After being dissuaded, they are generally required to write a review letter and conduct self-reflection at home, and they are not allowed to return to school during the period of reflection. After parents, class teachers, group leaders, and school directors have confirmed that they have indeed conducted deep reflection, they may be allowed to return to school.
-
If the teacher is to dissuade the student, then the student can report it to the Education Bureau, but if it is a nine-year compulsory education, it is not allowed at all, so you can report it.
-
Kiss, what is the reason to dissuade the child?
Questions. The school's justification is to besiege and threaten underage students.
The school's justification is to besiege and threaten underage students.
I don't even know what to do anymore.
I don't even know what to do anymore.
Actually, the truth is not that serious.
Actually, the truth is not that serious.
Kiss the child to the principal, talk about it well, let the child have a better attitude, ensure that he will not do it again, and give him a chance to stay on probation.
Questions. Good.
Good. This kind of need to be a little more patient and thick-skinned, and talk to the parents and class teachers more, it is indeed the most important thing for the child to go to school, because it is useless for you to find the Education Bureau.
Questions. Communication language trouble point, thank you!
Communication language trouble point, thank you!
Hello principal, the child is now deeply aware of his mistakes, promises not to make them again, and promises to care for his classmates and respect his teachers in the future. Please consider that the child is young and immature, and give the child another opportunity to stay in school for observation, and if the child recidivates again during this period, our parents will take the initiative to pick up the child.
-
School teachers dissuade students, if it is the compulsory education stage, then the teacher has no right to dissuade the student, of course, if it is not the compulsory education stage, the student has a very serious mistake and the impact is not good, then the student can be dissuaded.
-
What should I do if a school teacher dissuades a student? When a school teacher dissuades a student from withdrawing, the student's parents should make a suggestion to the school teacher in accordance with the law, telling the teacher that it is illegal to dissuade the student and that their child still wants to study here.
-
The school teacher advises the student to consult the school principal. Be sure to consult clearly and find out what is the reason for the dissuasion of students? If the student is unable to study normally at school due to illness, the school will dissuade him, and if the student has made a serious mistake, it may be a disciplinary decision given by the school.
-
If the school teacher dissuades the student to quit, then the student needs to understand his own shortcomings and improve the shortcomings so that the teacher does not dissuade the student.
-
Students who are persuaded by the teacher to quit must have done something against the school rules at school, so they should first admit their mistakes to the teacher and then give the teacher some benefits.
-
If the school teacher persuades the student, then the student must have violated some of the school's rules and regulations, and the student must have made a serious mistake, so the teacher will persuade the student as a last resort.
-
What should I do if a school teacher dissuades a student? First of all, the teacher does not have the right to dissuade the student, first of all, to understand what kind of thing is the reason.
-
What should I do if a school teacher dissuades a student? What is the reason for dissuading students? Students should have a good learning environment, how can you dissuade students?
-
I don't think this can be unilateral, it should be a tripartite negotiation, the school, the parents, and the students.
Of course it will, there are too many young male teachers now, and some of them are also very handsome, and they are particularly good in all aspects, although the teacher-student love has been immoral since ancient times, but anything can happen in today's society, sometimes it is understandable, but you must deal with this relationship! If you have a family, don't destroy it.
If it is just the student's fall, the school is not primarily responsible, after all, it is an accident, unless the school directly or indirectly caused the student to fall. The school is only responsible for teaching. Custody. >>>More
First of all, it depends on whether the student's belongings are legitimate. If a student has illegal items (such as flammable and explosive materials, controlled knives, drugs, stolen goods, etc.), not only teachers, but also any citizen, can deprive them of ownership of illegal items. Because the laws of the country protect the legitimate property of citizens. >>>More
If it's a tutor, it's definitely not illegal! However, it is against the rules to organize make-up classes for students on a large scale. Especially when the teacher organizes it rather than the school organization, what should be learned in the classroom has to be learned by making up the lessons.
It is necessary for college students to bring their laptops to school, because college students need to rely on computers to access relevant materials, and they also need to rely on computers to study and complete homework during their studies. For which majors students need to bring computers, in fact, there is no clear rule, it depends on the student's own wishes, but it can be said that most of the majors need to bring computers to school, college students in school learning can not do without computers, if there is no computer, may not be able to access the information, can not complete the coursework assigned by the teacher, so it will also delay their studies. In response to this problem, Mr. Xiaojiang would like to share a few personal views. >>>More