What do you think about the phenomenon of university teachers always asking students to speak?

I think this is a particularly good phenomenon, because university teachers always let students give some speeches, so that students can exercise themselves in the process of speeches, for example, before each student's speech, they will definitely have to write some scripts, and in the process of writing manuscripts, they will exercise their own literary style, and they will also exercise their language skills when giving speeches. Moreover, it can improve students' self-confidence, and sometimes, there may be some unexpected situations during the presentation, such as forgetting the manuscript, etc., which can also test students' adaptability.

If you think that the teacher is idle and has nothing to do, then you must not really understand the teacher. If the teacher asks you to say this, then he will definitely have a reason. It's like a university teacher who always asks students to give speeches.

You will find that in the process of your speech, your thinking logic is very clear, your eloquence is very fluent, and your courage is also very large. When you realize that you've made these changes, you'll probably have a better understanding of why college teachers keep students talking.

I think that university teachers always ask students to give some speeches, on the one hand, because they want to cultivate students' expression skills and the state of speech, so that they can improve their self-confidence, organizational expression skills, and ability to adapt to situations on the spot, and on the other hand, because the teachers themselves are too lazy to speak, so they let students give speeches a lot of times.

Since I went to university, I feel that making PPT every day and giving speeches on stage every day has become a commonplace after dinner. Actually, I didn't understand why the teacher wanted to do this very early on, and I probably just thought that he was too lazy to do it, so he let us do it ourselves. But then I found that I really learned a lot of my courage and self-confidence in the process, and it was also greatly improved, so I think the teacher asked us to give a speech on stage, probably in most cases because we want to exercise better, because this is a small society after all, he may want us to have a better performance in the future society when we encounter the same situation.

I think this is a very good phenomenon, because university teachers know that when their students go out into the society, they will face all kinds of opportunities to speak in public. And many people can't do it well, so in order to make everyone better promoted in school, they will arrange for students to give their own speeches.

I think that university teachers want students to give speeches more by themselves to exercise their courage, so that they have more courage to show themselves in front of more people, show their ability and language quality, because there are many college students who are shy and don't like to show themselves in front of many people, so they can exercise their courage.

As a college student, I think this is a relatively normal phenomenon, because universities pay more attention to the cultivation of students' qualities and abilities, rather than a single aspect of knowledge, so teachers want to have a deeper understanding of what they have learned through this way of letting students speak, and at the same time cultivate their leadership.

This is a good opportunity for students to practice their presentations, so that they can be familiar with the interview in the company in the future, or when they speak at the company. It will not be particularly nervous, which will lead to stage fright in the future and leave a very bad impression on others. In college, the audience of the speech is your classmates, so you can better train students.

First of all, I don't think it's advisable for students to dismiss professors from their lectures, because such behavior violates not only freedom of speech, but also academic ethics. Regardless of whether the professor's views are correct or not, they should respect the freedom of speech and academic research of others, and express their opinions through reasonable discussion and debate.

As for what the purpose of reading is, I think the purpose of reading should not be just to make money, but should take into account many factors. Reading can not only acquire professional knowledge and skills, but also broaden horizons, improve thinking ability, enhance humanistic literacy and social responsibility. In today's society, reading can also help people to better meet the needs and changes of social development, and improve their overall quality and competitiveness.

Of course, different people have different goals and pursuits, some people may pay more attention to the practicality and economic benefits of reading, while others pay more attention to the intrinsic meaning and cultural value of reading. No matter what the purpose of reading is, we should respect and encourage everyone to pursue knowledge, explore the truth, and improve their abilities and qualities.

A few days ago, a teacher was stopped on the spot because of the inappropriate content of his speech, which caused dissatisfaction among teachers and students. Such news has aroused everyone's attention, and it has also caused a discussion about whether reading should have a utilitarian purpose. ......On this issue, my opinion is that the direct goal of reading is to acquire knowledge, the ultimate goal of reading is to achieve success, and utilitarianism exists in the hearts of each of us, and we should face up to these three aspects.

1. The immediate goal of our reading is to acquire knowledge. There is no utilitarian purpose in this. The book contains all kinds of knowledge, and the process of reading books is the process of learning this knowledge.

Therefore, the immediate goal of our reading is to learn in order to acquire this knowledge. ......In this process, there is no utilitarian purpose. At this time, we will be calm and concentrate on reading, without any distractions.

Therefore, when we go to school in order to achieve our immediate goal, we do not have a utilitarian purpose. 2. The ultimate purpose of our study is to achieve success in our careers. There is no utilitarian component to this.

The ultimate goal of studying is to master the corresponding professional skills of Luliang, so that you can have the corresponding ability, so that you can continue to develop your career, and finally achieve the ultimate goal of career success. ......In the process of studying hard and working hard to develop his career, he is struggling to realize his life ideals, which also does not contain utilitarian purposes. 3, Utilitarianism has a presence in each of us, and we should face it squarely.

In the hearts of each of us, there are all kinds of ideas, which include utilitarianism. ...Utilitarianism exists objectively, so we should face it squarely. ......In the process of reading and studying, there are some utilitarian purposes in our own hearts, which is understandable in itself, and from a practical point of view, we cannot put an end to the generation of this kind of depressive mentality, but as long as we can control our utilitarianism with reason, so as not to affect our development and progress, there will be no problems, let alone a bad impact on our development and progress.

The inappropriate time for the speech of the university teacher is as follows:

Recently, a "college teacher's middle school inspirational speech inappropriate content caused dissatisfaction, and was bombarded by students" The new banquet was heard early and was on the hot search, causing heated discussions among netizens. According to major news reports, on the afternoon of February 18, an associate professor of the School of Teacher Education of Hefei Normal University gave a thanksgiving keynote speech in Lujiang Middle School in Anhui Province.

Most of the values it exports are related to utilitarianism, and there are some vulgar contents." According to the netizens at the scene, vulgar and inappropriate remarks involving gender, nationality and ethnicity were involved in the content before the lecture. These contents caused a classmate at the time to refute, and the classmate took the morning tube and said loudly

We study for the rise of China! ", which caused a warm response from the audience.

Netizens think it's very inappropriate for this teenager who dares to speak up. Netizen: Teenagers have enthusiasm and dreams, no matter what will happen when they enter the society after opening the chakra, they have unlimited possibilities at the moment.

Netizen: Don't deny the aspirations of hot-blooded young people just because there is ugliness in society. If I haven't seen a bird, I think the world is full of birds.

Some netizens took out Mr. Lu Xun's original words: Chinese young people are getting rid of the cold air, just going up, and they don't have to listen to the words of those who give up on themselves. Those who can do things do things, and those who can speak up can speak up.

If there is a point of heat, a point of light, it will make it like a firefly, or it can shine a little light in the dark, and there is no need to wait for the torch.

I think such a teacher is an incompetent teacher, it is normal for students to actively speak in class, which means that the student is listening to your lecture carefully, indicating that he is following your train of thought, indicating that there are still people listening to your lectures, I don't know how the classes are in other universities, there are only a few people in our school who attend classes every day, so there are only a few who answer questions, so when the students answer the questions, the teacher is very happy, and finally there are students who can follow her train of thought. Finally, someone spoke, so the teacher was very happy.

The so-called active speech means that when the teacher asks a question, other students have not raised their hands to speak, and you actively raise your hand to speak, so I think the teacher should not be disgusted with you. So I feel that some university teachers hate students who actively speak in class, and they should hate those students who interrupt their train of thought and pop out a sentence from time to time, which is the reverse positive.

We all know a status quo when we go to college, that is, most of the students come to the classroom to sit in the back seat first, and then during the class, they all play with their mobile phones or sleep on the desk, and the teacher is also teaching their own courses, and they don't want to deal with us, so they treat it as if they can't see it.

Even sometimes there is a particularly active speaker in class, the teacher will respond to a sentence, maybe we think that this child is very serious, can maintain the state of high school learning to come to college, but the teacher sometimes does not think so, may find you annoying, a little disgusted with such a student.

Because the university teachers are also very easy in class, they take their fixed salary, and every time they complete the tasks said by the school at the beginning of the school and finish the books within the specified time, and then every time they come to class and see so many students playing with their mobile phones to sleep, the teaching will be much easier, don't worry about everyone not understanding and explain again, just say your own.

Who doesn't want to live a comfortable life, read to students casually every day according to the knowledge in the book, and then mention the important and difficult points again, and it doesn't matter if no one listens.

University teachers don't know how many classes of students have gone through, and they easily brought a class and ushered in a new class of the same class, basically every time, teachers get used to it over time, and suddenly a student who is too active will feel inexplicable, and even a little disgusted with such a student.

But I want to say that most of you have gone to college, and you are well aware of many situations, when we go to class, everyone sits in the back position, and then often the teachers of those universities do not ask questions in class, they just take care of themselves and lecture there, that is, they talk about theirs, and the students play their own games, which causes those students who actively speak in class to break this situation, which will make those teachers who are not going to ask questions to students feel a little embarrassed and embarrassed. Because many times, as a teacher, he didn't expect that students would take the initiative to ask questions or speak questions, so at this time the teacher could only ignore them or continue the class.

I think all this is because of our education policy and education system caused by the current embarrassing situation, the university should be a place for everyone to improve themselves, establish the correct three views, and increase knowledge, but in the end it has become a place for everyone to eat, drink, have fun, and enjoy themselves, which is the sadness of everyone. Of course, our university teachers should not be blamed for this, it can only be said that the situation is forced to do so.

I don't think most university teachers would be disgusted. At least the teachers around me are very encouraging to speak in class, and they are very happy to have students take the initiative to speak, because most of the students are playing with their phones down and do not interact with the teacher. Some students raise questions, the teacher is happy to answer, if the teaching progress is delayed, the teacher will say put this question first, we will ** after class.

And I found that the teachers around me would not leave the classroom immediately after class, but would stay on the podium for a few minutes to see if there were any students who wanted the teacher to answer questions. As for those students who like to speak, most of the students are appreciative, one is that he can be strict with himself and listen carefully when most people indulge themselves, and the other is that these students take the initiative to speak, so as to avoid the panic of being named by the teacher. Therefore, whether it is a student or a teacher, there should still be a minority of students who are disgusted with actively speaking in class.