The mother in law will give the house she built to her daughter

Hello, please rely on your words, the house you built, the mother-in-law wants to give it to her daughter, I am not very clear about the information. First of all, who started this house? It is divided into two situations, the first case, this house is built by your parents-in-law.

If it is your parents-in-law who built the house, then in this case, the ownership of the house belongs to your parents-in-law, so they have the right to distribute the ownership of the house. They can give the house to your husband, or they can give it to his daughter, and you have no right to object.

Another scenario. This house was raised by you. The money is from you and your husband.

Then the ownership of the house is you and your husband, that is to say, the title deed belongs to you and your husband. In this case, your mother-in-law has no right to dispose of the house at all.

Your mother-in-law said that she wanted to give the house to her daughter, and you can completely refuse. There is no name in his name for this title deed, and it has nothing to do with him.

But I suggest that you don't reject your mother-in-law directly, just talk to your husband, and let your husband convey your thoughts to her mother-in-law, telling her that it is completely impossible to transfer this house to his daughter.

If you and your husband paid for this house, and your mother-in-law made such a request, it can be seen that she really loves her own daughter very much, but at the same time he is also selfish, he actually wants to give the house to his daughter so much, you tell your mother-in-law, let him pay for his own money, and build a house for his daughter, you don't have to object to him.

But no matter what the circumstances, his daughter also has to be raised together.

Nowadays, marriages are built on a certain material basis, the material and money before marriage are very clear between husband and wife, and the common property after marriage is also counted by each other, although there is no too much consideration, but the common property has the right to dispose of, if the money is used by each other, used in their own small family, then I believe that no one will care, but if one party wants to carry the other half to take the joint property of the two to their parents or siblings, then the other half will definitely be 100,000 unwilling, The ensuing family conflict also produced ......

Therefore, it is best to use the joint property between husband and wife between each other, if your relatives really need help, please be sure to tell your other half, because your other half has the right to know, and you need to discuss with the other half, and get the other party's consent before you can take out the money for your relatives.

Don't feel that it doesn't matter if your relatives are short of money and take some money yourself, maybe you think it doesn't matter, but in the eyes ......of the other half, you can't tolerate this kind of behavior

When the mother-in-law must not stretch her hand too long, don't behave nonsense, self-righteousness, you must know that the daughter-in-law is not a daughter or a son, she is a stranger who has no blood relationship with you, if it is not because of your son, you will never be able to intersect with her, since you can meet, it is a kind of fate, so please cherish each other's fate, and don't think about the fate of breaking the ring at all costs, because when you do your best to break the fate of the ring, then your good days will come to an end. Even at that time, you not only drove away your daughter-in-law, but also your own son, and even your own home was shattered...

This matter is resolutely not good, it is contrary to common sense, my own house, why does my mother-in-law share it with her own girl? Does he have that right? Who gave him the right?

He wants to have this awareness, he can consult with me, and he can consider this issue when I am in a good mood, and he wants to do it forcibly without consulting me, and he will definitely not do it, and there is no one in his eyes.

That's a no-no.

First of all, didn't your mother-in-law pay for the house? If both of the above are your mother-in-law's, then your mother-in-law has the right to give the house to her daughter, because the national law stipulates that sons and daughters have the same obligation to support the elderly and inherit the property of the elderly.

If it is your own money to build a house, the homestead is also your own, which old woman does not have the right to give the house to your sister-in-law or sister-in-law, because the house is the property of your husband and wife, and others have no right to distribute it, including both parents or children, I hope my answer can help you.

That shows that this mother-in-law is a confused mother-in-law. Everything is towards the girl. I don't know what your husband eats.

Then why didn't he speak? You can't agree to this matter, if it's your own house. That must not be given to the daughter.

That is, your sister-in-law or sister-in-law. It would be unjust for your mother-in-law to do this, if your mother-in-law is forced to do so. It would be better to divorce and sell the house than to give it to her daughter.

Your mother-in-law has no right to give her daughter a share of the house you built. You should keep a list of the information and spending when you built the house, so that your mother-in-law can have evidence to sue her if she is unreasonable.

Why should you give your daughter a house that you built, you can only say that your mother-in-law is too partial, your mother-in-law thinks that her name is written on the real estate certificate, and she can give it to whoever she wants, you should stand up with your husband at this time and talk to your mother about it, the more cowardly you are, the more you will treat you as a soft persimmon.

If your mother-in-law wants to give him to his own daughter, this is impossible, and the law will not support such a practice, so don't worry.

And these things? Then you can ask your mother-in-law, you are also a woman and a person who has been a daughter-in-law, if your mother-in-law gives the house you built to your sister-in-law, do you agree, if you don't agree, you don't want to give our house to my sister-in-law, I don't agree either!

's own room, why does the mother-in-law want to share it with her daughter, it's really nonsense, do you agree? I think the mother-in-law might have a reason.

What right does your mother-in-law have to give to her daughter in the house you built yourself.

You can have a good talk with your mother-in-law, after all, it is your own house, then you are the mistress of this house, you should have the right to speak, if your mother-in-law is unreasonable, you should confiscate the key to the house.

If it's a short stay, I usually choose not to speak, and when her daughter leaves, I tell my mother-in-law that I don't like to live without saying hello.

Communicate with my mother-in-law to explain our own thoughts, after all, it is also our house, and we can't do it without our consent, even if you are an elder.

First of all, you should be angry inside. If you are not satisfied, you can ask your mother-in-law for advice. Then the two of them communicated the matter clearly.

It's better to let your husband handle things like this, after all, if you come forward, it will be easy to exacerbate the conflict.

Such an arrangement is indeed very unreasonable, you can talk to your mother-in-law about your position, communicate well with the family, don't lose your temper, and make it clear to your sister-in-law.

I think I need to have a good chat with your mother-in-law, and say that you also need to live in this house, and it is not good if she advocates it on her own.

You should communicate with your mother-in-law in time and correct his incorrect behavior in time

Your mother-in-law doesn't know what's going on. If it's good to talk about it, if you don't move, turn around and call the police. Otherwise, sell the house.

If your mother-in-law advocates that your house be given to her daughter to live in, you can actually bring up the topic more gently, and you can also express your own thoughts.

Did you buy it yourself? Then just blast it out!

Summary. Hello, are you the eldest daughter-in-law? I think it's important to be long-term, but it's also important to be competent. If the younger son had this talent, it would not be a good thing to give him the house, even though he was not the eldest son.

What should I do if my mother-in-law gives the house to her younger son.

Hello, are you the eldest daughter-in-law? I think it's just a long time, although it is a big laugh, but whether it can be competent, can not be ignored. If the younger son had this talent, it would not be a good thing to give him the house, even though he was not the eldest son. Lifting Chang.

I'm the eldest daughter-in-law, and if you say so, you should give it.

It's just nonsense. You who cheat money.

I'm going to have to question who you are, and if you're different, I'm going to say something different.

If the eldest son is not competent, it is not necessarily a bad thing to give the younger son, pointing to Zheng It is very important to show Cong Qi, but those who have the ability to lead the revival of the Zheng Song family are more worthy of the inheritance.

To put it mildly, if the eldest son can't run it, give him the house.

The ownership of the house is not only based on the elders and young, but also on whether there is a person who has the ability to lead the family to prosperity, this kind of person is equally important. Jingling is a person who can lead the family to be more prosperous, of course, I'm not saying that the eldest son can't. If Da Liangchen's son also has this ability, the house will be given to the eldest son, because he is the eldest son after all.

If the eldest son has this ability, I think the house is more suitable for him to give him a little. I also do not rule out whether the mother has a preference for behavior.

If I say digging is a little uncomfortable for you, I apologize to you, after all, my starting point is also to better solve this problem, so I may talk a little bit when I am dissolved.

I'm talking about the fact that the parents' things were originally divided equally, so the younger son got the house, is the younger son going to support his parents?

You are the wood of the level.

How do you know that his eldest son can't do it, can you see who can do it and who can't it since he was a child?

So how do you think I can help you?

The younger son gets the house and the younger son definitely has the obligation to support him.