How do we see the contradiction between a strong ego and the elimination of self grasping?

The contradiction between a strong ego and the elimination of self-grasping, in fact, there is no contradiction in this, and the destruction of self-grasping is just selflessness. The stronger a person's heart is, the less he has himself. Then there is no contradiction, and you can destroy the ego, and you can't be strong with self-centeredness, you have to be strong with self-centeredness, so that you can be strong, and you can destroy self-grasping.

Everyone will feel stronger, better and better, so that they are responsible for themselves. If you are not strong enough, you will be bullied by others.

It's not long, but I and the destruction of self are worthy of contradiction, it should be able to be reconciled, you have to become a strong self, you need to coordinate the destruction of self worthy of contradiction.

I think you can just look at this with a normal heart, just fine, no matter how strong you are? But no matter how small you are? I think hard work is the most important thing.

Personally, I think this is more about the reason why your personality is different.

I think this is indeed a very contradictory problem, because many times when dealing with some aspects of this state, there will be some thoughts and selfishness in it, so it is still difficult to deal with the contradiction.

Generally speaking, we can definitely be directly strong, and in the end, he is improving his ability, and he must be able to directly destroy his stubborn thoughts.

Then the contradiction between your self and the delay in destroying me, you must make yourself strong, and only when you are strong can you not be bullied.

Life can't go back to the past, the only thing you can go back to is the memory that exists in the bottom of your heart. So don't dwell on the past, failure allows us to gain experience, and success allows us to regain confidence. As long as you keep moving forward, you will reap the rewards.

I see that at any time, we should make ourselves stronger through some methods, such as learning more or practicing more.

It's just a spear and a shield, that's how I understand it, so there is a contradiction.

You still have to analyze this by yourself, adjust it yourself, others can't help you solve this contradiction.

I don't think it's really contradictory, it's two points of view looking at the same thing.

There must be contradictions, but contradictions are also relative, and the two complement each other.

If you are stupid, you will know how to persist and give up in a timely manner.

Robbed it to me, and then I deserve to contradict it.

Philosophy and psychology can help people maintain a normal state of mind.

First, the mentality is calm and peaceful, you can do things rationally, objectively think and execute, you will have a peaceful mind, too emotional and lose rationality, you will be moody and impulsive.

Second, there is no one who will not be angry, people always have people and things they care about, and sadness will definitely happen.

Third, most people can heal but cannot self-heal, and they will avoid any problems or pains and are not objective and rational. Only a bystander can see it all, and if you don't put your feelings into it, you won't be hurt.

Philosophy is the study of fundamental and universal questions. Philosophy, according to its etymology, means love and wisdom. Philosophy is a view of the universe with a rigorous logical system, and philosophy studies many very basic issues, such as the nature of the universe, the general law of the evolution of everything in the universe, and the position of man in the universe.

Psychology is a science that studies human psychological phenomena and their mental functions and behavioral activities under their influence. Psychology mainly includes two major fields: basic psychology and applied psychology.

Philosophy is a way to put one's mind right (psychology also has the same things, but the fields are different)1Calm and peaceful: If you can do things rationally, objectively think and execute, you will have a peaceful mind, if you are too emotional and lose your rationality, you will be moody and impulsive (learn to be tolerant and tolerant, you can make yourself not impulsive).

2.There is no one who will not be angry, there will always be people and things that they care about (loss and separation are inevitable processes), and sadness will definitely occur.

3.Most people can heal but cannot heal themselves (for example, doctors can heal others, but they can't heal themselves), and they will avoid any problems or pains and are not objective and rational. Only a bystander can see the whole thing, and if you don't let your feelings go in, you won't be hurt.

Is LZ trapped by love? Like and love are both human emotions, and some people say that like is faint.

I don't understand, I guess I'll have to figure it out myself

To put it simply, philosophy is self-oriented, while psychology is other-minded.

But the number of words is too small, I'm afraid that you will think that I am perfunctory to you, and I will say two more nonsense.

The ultimate research goal of philosophy is the ultimate value of life, and this ultimate value is a symbol of self and must be realized by self, so philosophy is to a certain extent a problem of oneself, that is, what "I" want to do.

Whereas, psychology, as the name suggests, is the study of mental activity, which explains mental activity with human instincts, i.e., what is the motivation for me to do something.

To put it bluntly, philosophy subjectively imposes values that guide human behavior.

Whereas, psychologists study human nature as a way to explain the motivations of human behavior.

Philosophers study what people are supposed to do, while psychologists study the motivation of humans to do things.

It's a mess.

The most different research methods are the same, with psychology taking the empirical approach, philosophy or speculative.

Those who heal cannot heal themselves.

Philosophy governs the world. Psychotherapy of the individual.