-
You can only flash the phone to crack the phone, so you don't need a certificate. **:
Netizens who hope to get the Saipan certificate:
1. The original certificate production process is that we submit the IMEI number to us, we make it through the official website of Symbian Certificate, and feedback to netizens to use, all the ** with this certificate production function, whether it is to provide a certificate**, or not to provide a certificate**, are the same way. There is no difference.
2. There is a huge difference in the current certificate production process, although the official website of Symbian Certificate still provides developer certificates, but at the same time as the IMEI number limit, a limit on the uid required by the software has been added, that is, because of this restriction, everyone can no longer use the developer's signature.
We also misled our developers because when we tested the new certificate, we signed and tested it with the "Mobile Home Assistant" we developed ourselves, but the uid of the "Mobile Home Assistant" was within the allowable range of the developer certificate, so we misled our developers. This weekend, we found that a large number of netizens were reporting the problem of not being able to sign normally, and thought about it, and re-tested it, and re-browsed the documentation on the official website, only to find that this huge change made it impossible to carry out the certificate production.
So, the current situation is: no matter which one, under the condition that the current situation does not change, it can no longer provide users with the function of certificate production. Unless you can crack the root certificate that the official website of Symbian Certificate has, there is no solution in theory.
-
Self-stevedore. The best I've ever used. You try it.
-
Hello, if it's just the expiration of the certificate, you can do this: adjust the time of the mobile phone system a little earlier, for example, it is 2012, you adjust it to 2011, don't adjust it more at a time, and adjust it until it doesn't expire.
If you adjust too much, it will indicate that the certificate has not yet taken effect, so you can turn it back a little bit. If it is said that the certificate is wrong, then it is a bit troublesome, one way, use the certificate to sign the software, but Symbian has closed the certificate application at present, so the second method can only be used, crack the phone. For specific operations, you can go to the "Saipan Know Mobile Phone Noise Forum" to have a look, there are many tutorials on it.
Since June 22, various mobile phone certificate production forums across the country have been forced to suspend the daily new certificate production service, and the opening time is to be determined!
As of June 22, the production of the Competen certificate has been stopped, Nokia has cooperated with Microsoft to abandon the Competen system, and the Competen certificate will be closed forever and will not be opened again.
If you encounter a "certificate expired" prompt during installation, you can install it normally with the following settings: adjust the date of the mobile phone one year earlier, the month and day remain the same, reinstall, and after the installation is completed, you can return to the normal date. In addition, it is recommended that you try to turn off the certificate detection, go to the "Program Management" menu "Settings" on your phone, set the "Software Installation Options" to "Bridge all software", and set the "Certificate Check" to "Off" to install it normally.
If not, there are only three ways to solve this problem: **Direct signing tool, there are many on the Internet, and it is also the easiest, but it does not work for high-privilege files Crack the phone, this is easier, you need to crack the software, you need to go to the Saipan forum to find the flash, this is the most difficult and there is a certain risk, it is recommended to go to the Saipan forum to find the brush master to help you brush the phone remotely and look at the mobile phone QQ official team to answer for you.
Of course, C5-03 is good, several main aspects, the camera C5-03 is 500W pixels, 5230 is 200W, C5-03 supports WLAN, and 5230 does not; The C5-03 is thinner and lighter than the 5230. For other details, you can check their detailed parameters on the Pacific Computer Network.
Precautions; 1. There is a risk in flashing, the mobile phone battery must be sufficient, the PC can not be suddenly powered off, and a clean PC system is the basic guarantee for flashing. I am not responsible for any failure to flash the machine. As long as you are brave and prepared, you will definitely succeed. >>>More
All Nokia's genuine mobile phones can be tried out by pressing "*" in standby condition, and those that do not respond are copycats, and the general genuine ones will display the model number, factory date and other ......
V880 absolutely surpasses,C5-03 is SymbianS60V5,V880 is Android,You can brush it,In addition, there are relatively more applications,It is definitely the best choice between the two for the game master,But after all, Symbian is so old for so many years,The stability will definitely not be weaker than Android。 In addition, the touch screen, ZTE is a capacitive two-point touch, and Nokia is a resistor single-point. ZTE's anti-reflective performance is better than Nokia's (the anti-reflective of the capacitive screen is stronger than that of the resistive screen), and the screen is not easy to scratch marks, the capacitive screen is relatively harder, and the resistive screen is softer. >>>More
Recommend C5-03, Android is powerful, but it is always a rookie, it is not mature, the system is not as stable as Symbian, if you are an enthusiast, the system is unstable and can be ignored, many software in the Android system is not as mature as Symbian, such as QQ >>>More