What conclusions are against your gut feeling, but have been verified by mathematical reasoning?

Updated on educate 2024-06-03
10 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    A rope of the same length encloses a square or a sphere, which will appear larger, at first it seems that it is a square, but the conclusion is that it is spherical.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    When the chopsticks are put into the water, I see that the chopsticks seem to have been broken, but they are not, it is just the refraction of light.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    In real life, there are many phenomena like this, such as the refraction of light sticking chopsticks into the water, which gives people different intuition and mathematical reasoning. There are also some phenomena that are waiting for you to discover.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    For example, the parallelograms are equal on opposite sides, but I don't think the two of them are the same length, and I always think that one is long and the other is short, but in fact, after reasoning, it is the same length.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    The sum of the inner angles of the triangle is equal to 180°, which has been confirmed by mathematicians, but I am good, I still don't believe it, because I always feel that it is not like 180 degrees.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Probably the refraction of light, because at the time I thought it was really very different from my intuition, but after a mathematical push, it should be like this.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    For example, the sum of the inner angles of a triangle on a plane is equal to 180 degrees, which does not seem like 180 degrees to my intuition, but it has been verified by mathematical reasoning.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    If it's a mathematical conclusion, I really can't think of ...... for the time beingI used to think that Banach's splitting paradox was counterintuitive, but once I knew what was going on, it became clear.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    1. Simpson's paradox: two sets of data under certain conditions will satisfy a certain property when discussed separately, but once they are considered together, they may lead to opposite conclusions.

    2. The isosceles triangle paradox: if there is a triangle, then the triangle is an isosceles three-sock book corner.

    3. Birthday paradox: If there are 23 or more people in a room, then the probability of at least two people having the same birthday is greater than 50%.

    4. Voting paradox: the obstacle or non-transitivity encountered in the process of realizing the transition from individual choice to collective choice through the "majority principle".

    5. Currie triangle: When calculating the parts with similar triangles, the resulting shapes do overlap in some places and in others.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Let me give you two examples, the Simpson paradox and the Montihall problem.

    The Simpson paradox states that the A set and the B set are each divided into two parts, and each part of A is smaller than the mean of the corresponding parts of B, but the whole may be a larger mean. For example, there are two classes A and B, and the students in each class are divided into two categories: good students and poor students, the average score of good students in class A is 90 points, the average score of good students in class B is 95 points, and class B is high; The average score of the poor students in Class A is 60 points, and the average score of the poor students in Class B is 65 points, which is also high in Class B.

    However, the overall average score of Class A is higher than that of Class B (for example, Class A has 50 good students and 20 poor students, and Class B has 20 good students and 50 poor students).

    The Montihall problem is that the contestant will see three closed doors, one of which has a car behind it, and the one with the car behind them will win the car, and the other two doors will each have a goat hidden behind it. When the contestant chooses a door but doesn't open it, the host opens one of the two remaining doors, revealing one of the goats. The moderator will then ask the contestant if he would like to change to another door that is still closed.

    The question is: will changing another door increase the chances of a contestant winning a car? If the above conditions are strictly followed, i.e., the host clearly knows which door is behind the sheep, then the answer is yes.

    If you don't change the door, the odds of winning the car are 1 3. If you change the door, the odds of winning the car are 2 3.

Related questions
5 answers2024-06-03

1. Simpson's paradox: two sets of data under certain conditions will satisfy a certain property when discussed separately, but once they are considered together, they may lead to opposite conclusions. >>>More

6 answers2024-06-03

Real-world problems. Sun was once sentenced to eight days of detention and a fine of 300 yuan by the public security organs because he deliberately beat up the waiter of the hotel because he drank too much. So, what are the types of public security administrative penalties? >>>More

26 answers2024-06-03

You ask a Fallout player what is the most impressive thing about Fallout. I estimate that it will probably be 70% of the time: deathclaws. >>>More

17 answers2024-06-03

Newton's First Law.

The law of inertia is a law that is more contrary to common sense. Since there is no such thing as a completely smooth environment on the earth, any object is kept moving in a straight line at a uniform speed. >>>More

18 answers2024-06-03

Xue Yang in "Demon Dao Patriarch" hated him at first, but when he saw the following sentence, he felt very sorry for Xue Yang at that time: >>>More