What do you think of the man suing his ex girlfriend for 60,000 yuan in love?

In our inherent impression, once two people in love have no feelings, they will naturally choose to break up. From the initial acquaintance, acquaintance and love, to the final "goodbye is also a passerby", it is very regrettable. But there is nothing there is to be done on either side, because the love between the two is gone.

But if one party regrets such an ending, he wants to do something practical for it, and he needs to do something to make up for the relationship, he will have the idea of compensating the other party for some breakup fees. It can also be referred to as "moral damages".

However, such costs are incurred on the basis of the consent of one or both parties, rather than a coercive or legal means.

Because I'm sorry, because I can't accompany you to the end, and I never have a chance to take care of you again. So, can you let me make up for it with the money I have, as my compensation to you? ”<

In a relationship, the two don't love each other anymore, and they can't step into the palace of marriage, but in the end, the other party threatens you with words and morals, "You have to give me some breakup fees as compensation, to compensate for the youth I have lost for you over the years." Such words have to be said, which hurts feelings. If you can't get to the end of your relationship, try to let it get together and disperse, and such words will undoubtedly break this last extravagant hope.

Is there only one person whose youth has been consumed? Could it be that the two have never been happy together? Could it be that the time the two spent together was wasted?

The man's approach in the question is similar to the above description.

When dating, the daily consumption of both parties is what you and I want, and there is no regulation in the legal effect: after the breakup, the two have to make up the difference for the relationship. Being able to support such a statement is only the moral bottom line in people's hearts.

If it is not the above conditions, but the girl uses the relationship to deceive the boy, defraud the boy of money and other behaviors, the boy can report to the police system to recover the cost through the consumption records such as mobile phones and bank cards. <>

I think it's normal for two people to fall in love and break up, and the expenses during the love period are also voluntary, and you can't ask for money back because of a breakup.

I feel that both people are at fault, and it must cost money for two people to fall in love, but if girls blindly only let boys pay for it, then boys will think that I have spent so much on you, and you can't leave me anymore, so many parents will educate girls that they must not spend other people's money casually when they go out, and this behavior of men makes me feel very ashamed and not generous enough.

I think that since it is a love process that you love and I want, it costs money to fall in love, and now that you have broken up and want to get the money back, this ability will not work, because in the process of love, although the man pays the money, the woman also spends her youth and her time on you.

I don't think this behavior of a man is very good, not generous enough, he can't be called a man.

Personally, I think that since I broke up, I can return the valuables given by the boy, and it is useless to keep them, I will definitely not wear them again, so it is better to return them to him. If a guy is so small-minded, it may be difficult to find a suitable girlfriend.

Do I still need to pay back the money I spent during my relationship? I think it needs to be returned. Nowadays, many boys and girls go for the purpose of marriage when they fall in love.

Today's young people know that it is not easy to make money, so when they are in love with their girlfriends, they want to marry girls, so this should also be regarded as a bride price.

part. <>

Although during the relationship, the expenses are shared expenses, but I think that the expenses such as transfers, bags bought for girlfriends, clothes, cosmetics, etc., should be refunded by girls. But the money for eating together is not necessary.

Because of these gifts, or money transferred to girlfriends, I think that after the breakup, the girl should return this part of the money to the boy, because the boy is in love with you for the purpose of marrying you, but then you break up for some reason, I think you still need to return some expenses during the relationship to the boy. But if the boy doesn't take the initiative to ask for you, I don't think it's necessary for the girl to take the initiative to return it to the boy. Of course, it mainly depends on who is right and who is wrong in this relationship.

I think the money that must be paid back is divided into the following categories.

1. When a boy and a girl are in a relationship, the girl borrows money from the boy.

Nowadays, there are many couples, and there are many times during their relationship that girls will borrow money from boys, although they do not have IOUs, and there are no formal borrowing procedures, but I think if they break up later for some reason, I think girls should return the money borrowed by boys to the boys.

2. Transfers or gifts.

When a boy and a girl are in a relationship, basically the boy will have some money transfer or give gifts to each other. I don't think that during the relationship, if you break up, the boy and the girl can make an appointment to talk, tell the amount of expenses, and then each pay back what they owe each other.

3. Usually play together or eat. I don't think it's necessary to ask for girls for such flowers, because boys are supposed to be generous. There is no need to count the expenses of eating or traveling as a girl, which I think is very unmasculine.

Don't, because the money spent during the relationship is willing to be paid back by each other.

The Civil Code stipulates that the money spent during the relationship must be repaid, so it is said to be repaid.

If you spend more than the accusation, it's best to pay back to your former Duan Youminren, because the ex's money is not blown by the wind, and the two branch holders should be cleared after the breakup.

It is necessary, because the two of them spend money with the purpose of being able to get married, but if it is not suitable, it is better to return the property.

Of course, the money spent during the relationship has to be repaid, because the two people are not married, and there are no people and things related to Brother Zheng, so of course the money during the relationship period must be returned.

It mainly depends on the reason for spending money and how much money is spent, small money does not need to be repaid, and large money must be discussed.

No, because the money spent on falling in love is a gift, which is paid willingly by the man, and there is no need to return it at all.

There is no need to pay back the money during the relationship, and when the two people are in love, they spend it together, and it is impossible to divide it very clearly.

For Xingzhou, after the breakup, the man sued his ex-girlfriend to make him pay back the money and won the lawsuit. I don't think it's necessary to spend money during a relationship. Bi Heng is actually willing to do it, and the other party also paid energy and physical strength.

I don't think you have to pay back the money you spent during your relationship, you have to pay back what you borrow. Anyway, in the sweet period of love, everyone wants to go to the palace of marriage at the end of friendship, and they don't think about breaking up. And spending money is also willing by the man, not forced, nor is it a fraud, so it stands to reason that there is no need to pay it back.

The man's request is very ridiculous, because Zao Wu and the two have broken up, and there is no relationship between Scanner or Ren Jimo, and his move to say to his ex-girlfriend that he wants to spend money on love has no legal basis, and the court will not support his request.

It is impossible for him to be supported by the law and envied, because the money he spent for his girlfriend was voluntary, so it is basically impossible for this money to be buried back.

It will not be supported by the law, because the law does not stipulate that the cost of love is unreasonable income, and the man pays it voluntarily.

Love is the premise of the marriage of the two people, the understanding of each other is deep enough, the two sides also determine the relationship will have the idea of marriage belt, so that the two sides form a new family, this is also the best ending we often see, there are also many couples because of incompatible personalities and other reasons and break up, this relationship is over, both sides of the effort is also in vain, during the period when both parties are still couples, they will also go out on dates, play and other activities, Spending money has become a necessary skin or fiber project.

However, it is extremely normal for the two to spend money on dating, some boys in order to make their girlfriends happy, will keep buying various gifts for their girlfriends, and in Hangzhou there is a woman who was sued by her ex-boyfriend, it turns out that this indictment requires the woman to return 290,000 yuan of love expenses, the woman was stunned for a moment when she saw this fee, the love behavior of the two, it is normal for the boy to settle the bill, but I don't know that after the breakup, I will get a lawsuit, So what do you think about this thing?

Judging from the court's judgment, the ex-boyfriend's request for the woman to return 290,000 yuan of love expenses was rejected this time, after all, the ex-boyfriend did not cite sufficient evidence to prove the love expenses, which is also a huge factor in the rejection, but from an ethical point of view, many boyfriends and girlfriends will be anxious because of emotional questions when they break up, and they rarely care about each other's money. I also know how much hatred my ex-boyfriend has for himself, this is all caused by emotional problems, and it is really rare for such a situation of settling accounts after the autumn, which makes many netizens incomprehensible, after all, the two have not yet reached the marriage stage, and the question of who spends money can be discussed, and it is also a sincere conversation with each other, after such an incident, the woman is also completely disappointed in this ex-boyfriend.

It is not easy for everyone to make money, during the relationship, they will recognize the other party as a person who can live with themselves for a lifetime, and they are willing to spend money for her.

I think this ex-boyfriend's approach is very bad, because Ming accompanied the envy for the two of them in the process of getting along, they must have paid each other a mess, and it was not the boyfriend's unilateral payment of the film.

I think that although the ex-boyfriend's approach is inappropriate, it is also reasonable, after all, 290,000 is not a small number in the eyes of ordinary people.

After the man and his girlfriend broke up, he sued the court, requesting to recover the expenses spent by the two during their relationship, totaling 290,000 yuan, and could provide screenshots of various transfers. However, the court did not uphold such an act, including the transfer of up to 35,000 yuan, which was not of a borrowing nature. <>

What does this big thing tell us, two people who are not married should be separated financially, and the daily expenses will be spent when they bloom, but don't expect the money to come back, you can know the scale, this thing is unclear. The two people are living together, that is, the money spent for living together cannot be determined to be borrowed, and it does not exceed the limit of daily interaction, so this money is not returned when the boy and his girlfriend get alongFeelings are feelings, life is life, money is money, and you must distinguish the core of the shed, otherwise in the end, there will be trouble, and no one can tell the matter. <>

If two people are really rushing to get married, both parties should have a general understanding of the economic consumption, not to mention the complete equality of the economy, each other should know where each other's economic ability is, the man spent 290,000 yuan on the woman, and the woman spent on the man, there is no report on this aspect, but in the end, it cannot be identified as the nature of the loan, and the transfer of 35,000 cannot be identified as the nature of the loan, is it not necessary to write an IOU to be identified? These things can't be explained, so netizens are discussing this matter fiercely, but it doesn't make sense. <>

You must not go to such a point with your girlfriend, if you are not married, you should know which money can be spent and what money cannot be spent, don't go to the end of the bamboo basket to draw water, it's not that you don't value your girlfriend or don't love your girlfriend, but both parties want to be equal, then they are all equal. didn't say that only boys and girls spend money, girls don't need to spend money, enjoy this kind of service with peace of mind, and then keep saying that they want to be equal in status again, this is unreasonable and nonsense.

The court rejected Nanfang's claim, and the court held that Article 16 of the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Private Lending Cases provides:"The plaintiff only filed a lawsuit for private lending on the basis of the transfer voucher of the financial institution, and the defendant argued that the transfer was to repay the previous loans or other debts of the two parties, and the defendant should provide evidence to prove its claim. After the defendant submits the relevant evidence to prove its claim, the plaintiff should still bear the burden of proof for the establishment of the loan relationship.

The court rejected the man's request to dismantle him, because both parties had to pay for lead in the process of getting along, and the man should not blindly ask for what he had paid.