Is it beneficial to open the book, is it beneficial to open the book or is it not beneficial to open

It is often said, "It is good to open a book, but it is good to read a book." However, on closer examination, this statement is not entirely true. If we are interested in every book, then "open books are beneficial" is not necessarily beneficial.

Today's classmates may like to read martial arts, romance only **, books and periodicals, sometimes to the extent of forgetting to sleep and eating, and not letting go of the book, once they are lost in books, they will go crazy, then they only think about books in class, and they don't have the heart to study, and their grades will plummet. There are also people who are attracted by some of the plots in the book, imitate the characters in the book, and sometimes go down the path of crime. Isn't this a harm to yourself by reading books?

This is just the first layer included in "unbook is not necessarily beneficial": unbook is not necessarily beneficial. There is also a second floor.

The second is that we have to be selective when we read books. Don't read books that aren't healthy and don't help us much. If we want to read books, we should read some books that are conducive to our physical and mental health, and helpful to our study and life.

Such a book is a good book, and only by reading a good book will you not ruin yourself. Some people compare books to friends, reading good books, that is, making good friends, will progress; If you don't read a good book, of course, you will make friends with people who can't make friends, and then you will regress. Because those who are close to Zhu are red, and those who are close to ink are black!

So, only good books will be good for you. Therefore, my point is that open books are not necessarily beneficial.

I sincerely hope that every student can choose to read. And don't ruin your life by reading the wrong book, leading yourself astray.

I don't think it's necessarily beneficial to open the book. It is true that reading books can increase people's knowledge, cultivate their temperament, and cultivate their body and mind, but "opening the book" is only a necessary condition for "benefit", not a sufficient condition.

Liu Xiang of the Han Dynasty once said: "Books are like medicine, and good reading can cure foolishness." "Since books are medicines, they have two functions:

One is good medicine, medicine to get rid of the disease; One is poison, which kills people. Isn't it? In Germany in the 20s, many people were considered Hitler's martyrs because they watched Hitler's "Mein Kampf" and were badly influenced by it.

A bad book is like a bad friend, it can kill you." It's not false at all, now some students are obsessed with martial arts or romance**, reading those grotesque books all day long, and "throwing" their homework aside, resulting in a decline in academic performance, and finally creating a bamboo basket to draw water. Think about it, can it be said that "opening" such a book "volume" is "beneficial"?

A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber. Therefore, whether it is beneficial to open the book depends on what kind of book is opened.

A philosopher once said that people who are able to consume the necessary nutrients are healthier than those who eat a lot. At the same time, true scholars are often not people who read books, but people who can read. Some people don't think seriously when they read books, they just flip through the pages casually, some people read books that are not suitable for them, and some people even read books with a curious attitude.

The idiom "open book is beneficial" naturally has its positive meaning as an emphasis on the importance of reading, but it is inappropriate to use it as an assertion that "open book" is "beneficial".

I think it's beneficial to open the book. The origin of the benefit of opening the book is that Song Taizu said:"As long as it's reading, there's always something good".Since then, it has become an idiom that the opening of the book is beneficial.

You may be wondering, why do you talk about this? It's simple, it's key"Total"Word. This is saying that there will always be good, not only good.

Therefore, to say that the book is beneficial, it needs to be argued that reading is beneficial rather than harmful. (Don't get caught up in the opposite side.) Otherwise, you will definitely lose.

The reason will be understood after reading the following)

As far as the benefits of reading are concerned, the power is so great that it makes people realize their mistakes, change their past mistakes, go to the bright road, and achieve success; Xiao can learn a few writing methods, a few words, and even recognize a few words. These are the benefits of reading, and there is no denying it. Therefore, a few points can be made to argue that bad books also have some benefits:

First, as long as it is called a bad book, it will certainly affect people's character and lead them to the wrong path. But think about it, if those bad books can't resonate with readers and make people go deep into them, then what will happen like this? If the structure and layout of the book, the way of expression, the idea and description, the language and the wording, etc., are mediocre, or even average"Journal"It's not as good as a similar composition, so how can it resonate with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad it is, at least some writing methods can be learned in the so-called bad books, and no matter how bad it is, you can learn a few words. Can this be said to be unhelpful?

Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book, it is judged by whether the good of the book outweighs the harm or the harm outweighs the good. In other words, bad books are also beneficial.

Third, Lao Tzu in ancient China had a point of view: everything has its own two sides, and since bad books are harmful, then they must have their benefits.

But have you ever thought that even if such a book exists, can anyone read it? Will you go to see it? Since I won't go to see it, then even"Uncoiled"With this premise gone, how to talk about whether opening the book is beneficial or harmful?

Fifth, although you can cite a bunch of examples of depravity, madness, and breaking the law because of reading. So what does this mean? It can only show that the person who reads the book himself is not in the right state of mind.

That's a matter of mentality, and can't be blamed on books. Can someone take a knife to cut and kill someone, can they blame the knife for being bad?

Therefore, as long as you read, it will be beneficial, whether it is big or small. So it can be pushed"Uncoiling is beneficial"It must be true.

1. For articles that do not have the advice of good teachers, the enlightenment of wise men, and the reasons why we do not want to read them, I would like to remind you that if you read them, it is equivalent to wasting time, and wasting time is equivalent to wasting your own life. Wasters of life are undoubtedly mutilating themselves, so is it beneficial for us to read such books?

2 For an article without a theme, we are writing a running account so vigorously, and such an article of "infinite scarcity for future generations" makes us read without the essentials and has no value. Do you still have the patience to read such a book? Are you reading for the sake of reading?

How does this kind of reading help you? That's all there is to it!

3. If the article you read does not have a constructive sentence, what are you looking for in the book? You don't just want to read a good ending. Therefore, such a book, you should have long ago used perseverance to stop yourself from wasting your energy.

At this point, I really want to warn you, you'd better not finish reading this sentence. But if you read for three more minutes because of curiosity, wouldn't it be a waste of time to do that?

5. Reading articles for a long time, our eyes are also damaged to a certain extent. We must pay attention to arranging the right time to read.

6. We must prohibit the reading of pornographic books, which undoubtedly give us spiritual opium. Is there any benefit to unbooking? As we all know, reading has been fun since ancient times, and the fragrance of books can go far.

Reading is wise, reading is pleasant, and reading is erudite. We have to squeeze in time to read. Let books purify our thoughts, and let the fragrance of books float on the journey of our growth.

But we must be careful not to read books that are meaningless, and not to read books that are detrimental to our physical and mental health. Also pay attention to eye protection. Whether reading is beneficial or not must be viewed from a dialectical point of view that divides into two.

It is a good medicine that can cure diseases;

It is poison that can kill. The first category refers to good books, and the second category refers to bad books. When people read bad books, it's like eating poison and ruining your future.

So how can you say that opening the book is beneficial? Also, if a person reads a bad book, it is like making a bad friend, and your own future will also be buried, and now there are many children doing illegal things outside, and they have not read bad books when they were teenagers, and many of the current books are unhealthy books, how can you ensure that today's teenagers do not read these books.

I'm from this manufacturer!! Reading a good book is like calling me a good friend, and reading a bad book is like making a bad friend. Those who are close to Zhu are red, and those who are close to ink are black. Once you make a bad friend, you will not be able to extricate yourself, fall into the abyss, and never turn over.

Reading is beneficial, and I don't agree with that. If you read a bad book, is it also beneficial? The reason why we read good books is because we want to learn something from good books.

And what can we learn from reading bad books? It's something unhealthy, and now there are a lot of vendors who sell books with names that look like teenagers can read, but the contents are things that are very bad for our growth, should we read such books? Nowadays, we don't have self-control, we can't control ourselves, such as people who are fascinated by Internet cafes, they soak in Internet cafes all day and night, which is not only harmful to the body, but also reduces academic performance.

Besides, people who are fascinated by reading books are the same as people who are fascinated by Internet cafes. Originally, we wanted to learn something useful from the Internet and books to broaden our horizons and absorb some knowledge extensively. But what good is it for some people to be obsessed with reading bad books, not only to learn nothing, but also to waste their youth?

Some high school students are like that, indulging in useless books all day long. As a result, I delayed my studies, my grades dropped all the way, and in the end, I was not admitted to a key university, wasting my life.

Factory I this manufacturer out!! Home Out!!

That's it when Durant, that's it when Durant, that's it when Durant, that's it when Durant, that's it when Durant, that's it when Durant, that's it when Durant, that's it when Durant, I don't like you that much when Durant is here? Du always feels that you are a world record holder for one of the reasons. Du always thinks yours.

Nonsense, nonsense, it can't be unhelpful, I think it's beneficial to open the book.

It will make you psychologically dependent and not to comprehend the knowledge in the book and not to integrate it.

Good books are beneficial, and bad books (e.g., advertising books) are not.