Why is Life of Pi called Pi?

The "double feature film" trilogy is adapted from the original book, and the interesting thing is that "Lying" ** does not have an ambiguous narrative that goes around and around, and I have never heard comic book readers interpret "Hulk" like a movie, and the original work of "Pie" ** Although there are also two sets of facts, there are more nuanced descriptions of the second kind, and readers are more psychologically inclined to the realistic version of the cruel encounter, which is the author's position: the positive energy inspired by faith is a powerful force against the cold reality**, but after all, it cannot replace reality, after a desperate escape, The truth has been restored. The film reduces the psychological weight imposed by the second story, which is based on the needs of the film classification, although "Pie" is not positioned as a family to watch, but the violent scenes are very mild, beast fighting, human and tiger fights are all pointed out with the language of the camera, a group of fish in the strong acid pool are killed, and human teeth are shocked in the tree fruits, not only is there a trace of blood, but it is beautiful like a dream.

The fantasy version" is still so, and the "reality version" is of course as refined as possible, and the direct result of weakening it is that the two truths are evenly matched, giving birth to a neat and typical "double feature film". <

Of course, most of Ang Lee's works are not written by himself, but I believe that the direction of the play is the result of his active instruction. Fantasy stories are popular, and it is logical to bring out many picturesque ocean wonderlands, some people are dissatisfied with their always appearing when the waves are calm, in fact, this is the need of the play, imagine that when the storm is raging, the protagonist is busy surviving, fighting with nature, how can he have the energy to weave daydreams? Seeing lightning as an apocalypse is already the maximum.

Cameron, who praised this film, must be a believer in the "realistic version", and what is more suitable for 3D than a whimsical fantasy. I guess Lao Ka must think that no matter how good "Avatar" is, it still depicts the "real scene" on an alien planet, compared to the 3D dream of this film, it is like killing chickens with a knife. Lao Ka is probably not a "child of God", otherwise he would not have shouted the famous phrase "I am the king of the world".

At the end of "Youth Pi", the big burden is shaken off, and the four seats are shocked (which also shows that the original ** is not popular enough), this narrative technique is reminiscent of "The Sixth Sense" and "Rose Flower, Red Lotus".

and other suspense films that "what you see may not be what you get", but the latter two have a definite truth, while "Youth Pi" lacks an "official" fact, so it is closer to "Total Recall".

Shutter Island and Inception

The ending part of the video game, that is, under the surface of a story, hides a completely different set of stories, and adds an open-ended epilogue, so that the whole film derives two possibilities of equal strength, no matter which version you believe, you can always find a lot of details to corroborate, enough to make the audience fall into a hard thought, difficult to understand. This is not the first time Ang Lee has tried this kind of "double feature film", under the narrative of "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon", there is a sadness that cannot be found in happiness, "The Incredible Hulk".

In the battle to break the shackles, there is also an implied metaphor of the femme fatale, and together with "Life of Pi", it can be called Ang Lee's "double feature film trilogy". Coincidentally, these are Ang Lee's three most visually focused and most commercially appealing works, which are full of exciting special effects, "Lying" is a break from the traditional cornices and martial arts, "Green" is a fight between high-tech military equipment and monsters, and "Pie" has sea disasters and strange scenery, or 3D presentation, all of which are full of strong commercial atmosphere. <>

Perhaps because he was worried that his best humanistic expression would be covered up in the high-impact action special effects, Ang Lee chose to use a double-story approach to deal with these three works, which is his natural creative appeal as a literati. In comparison, "Lying" and "Green" are closer to "Total Recall", that is, they use a set of video systems to tell two distinct stories, while "Pie" is confined to the original work, and the two stories are extremely contrasting, and it is impossible to copy this model, so that only one of the interpretations can only exist in the imagination of the audience. But the film still makes a lot of efforts to make the audience have a basis for describing those unseen scenes in their hearts, the details of the two stories bite like gears, the one-to-one correspondence between the boarding animals and the survivors, the unusual behavior of the animals, and the protagonist asks the monkey "What about your son", the mysterious island.

The attributes and shape of the allusion to "cannibalism", the tiger is an obvious symbol of the protagonist's inner fear. If the audience accepts the "real-life" version of the story, the film is a perfect demonstration of the powerful subjective power of the human mind, which can twist the facts so far that they can still justify themselves. It is conceivable that the terrible tragedy of cannibalism and cannibalism is so shocking that it makes people tremble when they think about it, and they rely on their subconscious under strong disgust.

The "beautification" of forgetting it is the most natural physiological reaction.

In the last shot of the film, the tiger jumps into the jungle and disappears, and the picture deliberately stays for a few seconds, as if to indicate that it will look back, but after all, it is just a joke. Bathed in the warmth of the family, Pie has escaped from fear, has completed the test and let go of life, and will cry emotionally when he talks about it in detail, but there are also lines of "it happens when it happens, why do you ask so much meaning". However, as an audience, I can't help but ask and think further.

The role of the writer in the film is equivalent to the audience's perspective, and he has experienced the whole process of listening to the story. Most of the time he did a very competent job, the foreplay of this story is long, and because of the buried many clues, before and after and can't give up, he also said when the audience was bored, "You have already told the name of the **, boarded the ship to Canada", for everyone to complain that the pie is not fast to the point. <>

But after the story is told, he has to make a choice as a character, thus deviating from his duty to represent the audience. He chose to believe the first story, but not all viewers had faith, or had a belief based on God, and there was a bifurcation in understanding. Brain-burning movies such as "Total Recall" pay attention to logical deduction, and restoring the truth is a club activity for science students, while Ang Lee's double feature films value emotional support, and when discussed, it is similar to a liberal arts student attending a workshop.

The truth of "Lying" depends on the audience's interpretation of Taoist culture, the conspiracy theories of "Green" are based on the audience's attitude towards the relationship between the sexes, and "Pai" is attributed to faith, which cannot be justified by the logic of facts alone, and it is unlikely that people who hold mutual dissent will persuade each other with arguments. Speaking of which, it is still a reinterpretation of old sayings such as "if you believe, if you don't believe, you don't", and "if you are sincere, you are spiritual". It is certainly a pleasure to persistently defend the interpretation of one's own identity, but in the author's opinion, why do you have to have a result, and the perception of the world is hazy, which is also the attitude of many positive and optimistic people in life, perhaps this is the original intention of Ang Lee to shoot double feature films.

Life of Pi is a film directed by Taiwanese director Ang Lee and based on the Canadian writer Yann Martel's name**. The film's true story metaphor is about religion, belief, life, and death.

The protagonist of the film is an Indian boy, Pi, who is the sole survivor of a shipwreck during a sea trip to the Guessing Feast. Pie is trapped in a lifeboat with only a Bengal tiger as a companion. During his 227 days at sea, Pi experienced life and death tests, and many stories took place with the Bengal tigers, including competition and coexistence with each other on the same floating plank.

Eventually, Pie is rescued, but his experience has profoundly changed his life as a pure omen.

There are many religious and philosophical metaphors in the film, the most important of which is religious belief and the meaning of life. Pai's drifting on a boat and spending time with Bengal tigers is a state of extreme loneliness and helplessness, which also reflects people's sense of helplessness in the face of life and death. On this basis, Pai began to think about the true meaning of life, and to explore the comfort and guidance given by religious beliefs.

In the final scene of the film, Pie tells his story at sea to the people who rescued him, but the audience doesn't believe him, believing that he is just making up the story. It also reminds viewers that it is often difficult to understand the inner world of other people, let alone the plans and meanings of the Divine. Therefore, the film's true story metaphor is also a reminder to learn to understand and respect the beliefs and choices of others, while also recognizing one's own smallness and vulnerability in the face of life and death.

Life of Pi is a ** written by Yusenis Martil. Although the story is fictional, it contains many deep philosophical and psychological metaphors.

Among them, the most obvious metaphors are about the theme of faith and religion. In **, Juvenile Pi lives in a religious family in India, and he and his parents follow different religions, so he has a deep knowledge and understanding of religious beliefs and beliefs. In the days of drifting, the nuclear collapse boy faction experienced many dangers and hardships, he constantly faced death and despair, but he never gave up his faith and hope, and persevered in life.

This reflects the psychological support and encouragement that faith and religious convictions give to people.

In addition, there are deep philosophical themes such as the meaning of life and existence, as well as the relationship between man and nature. In the process of drifting, Pi constantly confronts the forces and challenges of nature, and in the process, he gradually realizes the relationship between nature and human beings, as well as the true meaning of life and existence.

Overall, Life of Pi is a true story metaphor that touches on deep philosophical and psychological themes such as religion, belief, life, and existence, leading readers to think about and explore these issues.