What are the major logical errors in Gao Xiaosong s view of history in the eyes of professional hist

Gao Xiaosong's view of history adds some subjective thoughts to some things, which does not conform to the complete historical process.

The fan of the canonical history of the Satono history. He and his team should be very serious about Taiwan's history. But he's not a history professor, he only sees himself as a reader, and he also chats with the audience when he does the show, and it doesn't matter where he talks, which is actually quite good.

Even now, some history is still controversial in the academic circles, and the so-called canonical history may not have been tampered with.

Gao Xiaosong always has his own personal character and views on historical knowledge, so it is inevitable that he is a little extreme, not so fair and just.

Selfish, talking about the country without the country. All for the benefit of their kind.

His view of history is always accompanied by his own views on this period of history, which may not be correct, and it does not represent everyone's ideas.

His view of history is subjective, and much of the content is speculated by herself, and there is no real historical basis.

In fact, in the process of speaking, he added some of his own ideas, or said something else for the effect of the show, so there is no historical difference.

Gao Xiaosong's view of history is characterized by logic, and the so-called textbook history, except for time and events, is all made up blindly.

I feel that Xiaosong is negative, and the preliminary argument is that the navigation conditions at that time were not up to and Japan should have had the conditions to record relevant information at that time, but there is no such thing as this, I am looking forward to Gao Xiaosong's answer, and other netizens can also talk about it.

I have studied history for several years, and judging from my three-year junior high school history skills, Gao Xiaosong often doesn't know how to pretend to understand, and he has to pretend to be a lupine scarf.

Gao Xiaosong is a storyteller at best.

I feel that being short and tight discriminates against the Ming Dynasty.

If the history of your mouthpiece has a position, why can't he have it?

I don't know history! I love to hear Brother Xiaosong talk about history!

The subject asked, "How do you evaluate the part of Gao Xiaosong's talk show that involves history from the perspective of history major?" The focus is on "History Major" and "How to Evaluate".

History pays attention to a piece of evidence, that is, our descendants have not experienced the past history, and do not know what exactly happened, we can believe that it is the official history books ("History of the Sui", "History of the Ming Dynasty" or something), as well as what folk historiography says (Sima Qian's "Historical Records", Sima Guang's "Zizhi Tongjian" or something). Archaeological discoveries are also a piece of evidence for reference, such as the discovery of the Yin Shang site and the Terracotta Warriors and Horses Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang.

The above evidence is mutually demonstrated, one may overturn the other, and one may supplement the other. In short, what we pursue is to restore the truth of history. A hypothesis can be put forward without sufficient evidence, but it is only a hypothesis, and it is not true as long as it is not confirmed in the end.

Gao Xiaosong's programs involving history, including the parts about history in other programs, if they are more truthful from the perspective of history majors, they will examine whether what he said is true, and some of them have been learned in class, and there is evidence to prove the truth, and they do not doubt it; Some are questionable alternatives to be compared to others. That is to say, from a professional point of view, history is serious, Gao Xiaosong's program is entertaining, listen to it, haha and have fun, it is no problem to accumulate a little capital of Kan Dashan, but to learn history and understand the truth of history, the history major has its own pursuit.

Therefore, I think that ordinary people should not be more serious, just look at it casually, and meet the unheard of, which can be regarded as seeing knowledge. History majors, unless they want to get a different way of thinking from Gao Xiaosong to be inspired, they should have been climbing the ivory tower.

The history narrated by Gao Xiaosong is relatively objective and fair.

There are true and false, and there are a lot of mistakes in the details, after all, it is a **. He has been to many countries, and his knowledge is indeed extensive, and he can talk about everything and tell a lot of truths, but after all, he is not studying history, he just reads a lot of books, and the details are not handled well.