If China s raw milk standards are not updated for ten years, will there be any impact on enterprises

The impact is still very large, since the melamine incident, the Chinese have lost confidence in the domestic dairy industry. For more than a decade after that, I was skeptical of domestic milk drinks. <>

Especially in the milk powder industry, many people would rather buy the milk powder imported from abroad than buy the milk powder produced by domestic regular manufacturers and large companies.

Because they feel that at least they can leave the country and enter our country when they enter the country, which means that these milk drinks should be able to meet the standards. In fact, foreign products are more dangerous than domestic products, but few people know about them. <>

The standards for raw milk are far below international standards, which is undoubtedly a great shame for China's dairy industry. Because many large companies, in fact, the standards they consciously set are much higher than international standards, such as Guangming, Yili, Mengniu and other big brands.

Why do these companies do these things so consciously? The main thing is to restore the confidence of consumers, after all, they have experienced such a dark time, so they understand that consumer trust is the most important.

And it's not hard for today's technology to raise these standards, it's important to see if you're determined. Some small businesses or three-no brands may produce some unknown low-quality milk on the edge of national standards and sell it in the vast markets of rural areas. <>

Although there is no harm in drinking these milk for a short time, for example, the bacterial content alone is limited to 2 million ml in China and 500,000 ml in the international world.

These standards were promulgated 10 years ago, and some of the standards issued before these 10 years are even lower than those issued in 1986. In other words, in the past 30 years, China's dairy industry standards have not made much progress.

It has implications for both parties. For consumers, the standard of raw milk is very low, which makes consumers worry about safety. For enterprises, their own level is already higher than the standard, but because the standard remains unchanged, consumers do not trust the company.

China's raw milk standards have not been updated for ten years, which has an impact on both enterprises and consumers, and the long-term failure to update has caused the company to fade out of the eyes of consumers, making it difficult for new consumers to have channels to understand; It is not good for consumers to know the latest rankings, resulting in consumers not knowing how to choose.

It has caused a great impact, and the failure to update dairy standards can easily lead to a decline in the quality of milk produced by the dairy industry, and it is not in line with modern human nutrition.

For enterprises, with the improvement of technology but the standard is never improved, it will cause enterprises to become complacent and obsessed with the current achievements. For consumers, it is impossible to better judge the quality of sound raw milk, and there is no clear judgment standard when purchasing.

China's raw milk standards have not been updated for ten years, which will of course have an impact on consumers and enterprises, because consumers will compare and choose better to buy.

As of now,China's raw milk standards are among the lowest in the worldAt present, China's national standard for raw milk was released in 2010, and has been questioned by the industry and consumers for 10 years because the two key indicators of protein and total number of colonies are too low, even lower than the old version of the national standard for raw milk in 1986. Compared with western developed countries, the current national standard for raw milk is indeed a lot behind.

The total number of colonies and the number of somatic cells are indicators to measure the safety of raw milk, and too high will pose a safety hazard. It is in this indicator that the current national standard for raw milk in China is far lower than that of other countries, which is 2 million ml, and the total number of colonies of raw milk in other countries is less than 100,000 ml. In addition, in terms of the number of somatic cells, China's current national standard does not make any requirements.

The Italian raw milk fat content standard is, protein content, SCC that is, the number of somatic cells in raw milk must be less than 4 * 1000000 CFU ML, and the production and ** dairy products containing antibiotics are prohibited.

The standard for the fat content of raw milk in the United States is that the protein content and the total number of colonies shall not exceed 100,000 CFU ml, and the number of somatic cells in the raw milk must be less than that of dairy products with excessive antibiotic content. The freezing point requirement of raw milk, that is, to check whether the milk is mixed with water, is higher than the rejection.

The French raw milk fat content standard is that the protein content and the total number of colonies must be less than 5*100000cfu ml, and the number of somatic cells in raw milk must be less than 4*1000000cfu ml, and the production and ** dairy products containing antibiotics are prohibited. The freezing point of raw milk, i.e. checking whether the milk is mixed with water, gives a warning at Celsius, which is higher than rejecting.

The Greek raw milk fat content standard is, protein content, the total number of colonies must be less than 4 * 100,000 cfu ml, scc that is, the number of somatic cells in raw milk must be less than 4 * 1,000,000 cfu ml, and the production and ** of dairy products containing antibiotics are prohibited.

China's raw milk fat content standard is, protein content, total number of colonies less than or equal to 2 * 1000000 CFU ml, SCC that is, the number of somatic cells in raw milk must be less than 6 * 1000000 CFU ml (usually dairy companies do not pay attention to it), the product shall not detect antibiotics (only recommended standards, no mandatory effect), raw milk freezing point qualified range of Celsius.

From the raw milk standards of some countries listed above, it can be seen that China's raw milk has relatively low requirements in terms of protein content, colony number, somatic cell number and freezing point. This can lead to uneven quality of raw milk, and although some standards are clearly defined, they are often ineffective in the implementation phase.

In other countries, the standard definition is to limit the total number of colonies to 100,000 ml. Somatic cells and proteins are controlled within the standard range.

Other countries are more selective in terms of carbohydrates, using lactose, sucrose, cereal syrup, maltodextrin, glucose and fructooligosaccharides, as well as edible starch, using plant-based fats, and providing highly nutritious and easily digestible milk powder.

In the discussion draft of the new national standard, two new indicators reflecting the freshness of dairy products were introduced - furfuric acid and lactulose. The fresher the milk, the lower the furfic acid in the protein, and the same goes for lactulose. The discussion paper proposes that the furfurine in pasteurized milk should be 12mg 100g protein as the upper line.

This kind of indicator of the freshness of dairy products has caused controversy, especially if dairy companies need to transport large quantities of long distances. In general, locally produced milk can be consumed nearby to maximize the freshness of milk, but China's special situation is the "milk transportation from the north to the south": the main milk source is in the north, and the main consumption areas are in the central and southern regions, and the cold chain transportation is restricted.

The provisions of the new indicators may affect the promotion of pasteurized milk by dairy companies, and if the new standards do not match the current milk source layout, it will cause controversy and discussion.

First of all, why do you want to go with the world? The world is a group of countries under the control of capitalism, so they must be good at changing the standards? It's just to dominate the market, so it's not necessarily foreign, it's good to be suitable for China's development.

Because China's dairy industry standards are lower than those in the world, many dairy companies have obstructed and have not been able to update dairy standards.

Because***. The quality of raw milk produced in China should lead the world, and the standards of 10 years ago are now applicable, so there is no need to update.

According to reports, it is because of the obstruction of many dairy companies, resulting in the dairy industry standards not being updated for a long time.

Because in the process of formulating the new standard, there are many disagreements, such as whether to grade dairy products and whether the third-party testing agency is mature.

Because to comply with the new standards, it is necessary to increase production capacity so that it can keep up with the pace of the world's largest dairy companies. However, these large companies have their own perfect equipment, their own standard production industry chain, and people in the R&D department.

If we rashly set the new standard too high, it will affect all people up and down the entire industrial chain, and many people may lose their jobs because of this. Therefore, considering such a serious impact, then our country can only slowly promote the implementation of this new standard.

Therefore, if we rashly set the standard too high, then it is equivalent to giving them a hug, making it difficult for more small and medium-sized enterprises to survive. These small and medium-sized enterprises are no longer competitive against these large dairy companies, and if the policy pressure continues, the pricing power of the large companies will return. Therefore, for the sake of fair competition and to ensure the employment of many people, we can only endure it again and again in this regard.

The introduction of new standards will take a long time to negotiate and develop, and China itself is a country that has developed mainly in agriculture, not a dairy industry.

China's dairy industry has been implementing the previous standards for its own interests, and the emergence of new standards will lose a lot of benefits.

Because in 2008, because of the melamine incident, the majority of consumers have doubts about national dairy products.

The introduction of new standards would be contrary to the interests of many parties. In particular, many large milk producers in China have outdated equipment and technology, and they will have to spend a lot of money to purchase new equipment if they raise new standards. That's not good for the industry.

China's raw milk standard is much lower than the international level, because the major enterprises default to the production standards, resulting in the raw milk standard is lower than the international level!

Because the new standard has not yet been announced. The requirements of the new standard are stricter than the world's highest standards and are still being discussed, so the old standards are lower than the international level.

Because China's raw milk standard is still the old standard, the new standard has not yet been formulated.

Because these standards published by our country 10 years ago have not been updated until now, but most of the domestic enterprises have been higher than our national standards.

Due to the complexity and length of the process, the new standard has not been introduced for a long time. Milk is rich in nutrients, can provide the human body with rich calcium, protein, fat, calcium and other nutrients, help to enhance human immunity, promote human health, the current implementation of China's national standard for raw milk was released in 2010, due to the protein and the total number of colonies of the two key indicators are too low, even lower than the old version of the national standard for raw milk in 1986, released for 10 years has been questioned by the industry and consumers.

Because it's still being discussed. Although the old standard was the lowest in the world, the new standard is more stringent and intends to exceed the world's highest standard, so it is still being discussed.

According to reports, it is because of the obstruction of dairy companies such as Yilimengniu, so there is no new dairy industry standard for a long time.

The current national standard for the dairy industry has been implemented for ten years and has lagged far behind the development level of the industry. Now consumers and dairy companies have no objection to the introduction of the new national standard as soon as possible.

Deng Rongzhen has worked in the Dairy Office of the Ministry of Agriculture, the China Dairy Industry Association and the China Dairy Association, and is an authority in the dairy industry. "The development of an industry, a class of products, the ultimate goal is to meet the needs of the market and consumers, a national standard is too low, how can not be said, the national standard must be equivalent to the standard level of advanced countries. ”

Song Kungang, honorary chairman of the Dairy Industry Association, believes that when the new national standard will be announced will have no impact on the development of the industry itself. "Some time ago, some people said that the index is the lowest standard in the world, the worst standard, of course, consumers are right to question it, because it is indeed poor, but that standard has no restrictions on good milk produced by cows, and it will not restrict processing plants from collecting good milk, and the interests of consumers will not be affected because of this standard.

In February 2018, the subordinate departments of the Ministry of Agriculture launched the first discussion draft of four new national standards for raw milk, pasteurized milk, sterilized milk and reconstituted milk. Then, two and a half years later, there was no news on the progress of the discussion draft.

On July 29, 2020, Gao Hongbin, honorary president of the China Dairy Association and former vice minister of the Ministry of Agriculture, said at an industry conference called "Kick-off Meeting for the Construction of Modern Dairy Evaluation System": "The national standard for new milk is being revised and may be introduced in the near future. But this statement once again caused heated discussions in the outside world.

The China Dairy Association also stated that the national standard for new milk, which is being revised, may be introduced in the near future. However, due to the complex and long process, the long-awaited new national standard may still be difficult to come out in the short term. Implementing high standards as soon as possible is what our consumers are looking forward to the most.

Because China's food safety requirements are very strict, the raw materials and processing of raw milk exceed international standards, and there is no need to implement other standards, so the global minimum raw milk standard is still implemented in China.