High school history in the colonizer invasion of the world for good or bad

Updated on history 2024-06-25
8 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    There are also advantages and disadvantages. The invasion of the aggressor shows the strength of the country, and lets those invaded countries know that they will be beaten if they are backward.

    The disadvantage is that the war has brought great disasters to the people, and the colonizers will enslave the people and cause the destruction of the country.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    It has promoted global cultural integration, led to the development of capitalism, spread the idea of capitalist democracy, dealt a serious blow to the feudal system, and since then the whole world has to follow in the footsteps of the world, and promoted the development of history.

    The debate can be cut from the weakness of the Qing Dynasty, and the changes that have taken place in China since the invasion of the capitalist powers in modern times must be taken from the big picture, that is, from the perspective of human history and Chinese history, otherwise it will be destroyed

    What other changes in Africa and Latin America can be said Don't be mixed with any slaves ** That's just the tip of the iceberg of history From the big picture! From the big side!

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Personally, the proportion of people who think it is still a good thing is large, knowing that they are poor there, and it also brings advanced civilization.

    You can talk about the economic and cultural backwardness of the later period of the Manchu Dynasty and the progress of China in all aspects after the Opium War.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Simple, several aspects, to the invaded brought as follows.

    Economy: modern production methods and technologies.

    Politics: Modern democracy.

    Culture: science and technology, democratic thought.

    By the way, shake the local backward system.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Does the questioner want a written answer or an actual objective answer? Written answers are available in history textbooks. As for the actual answer, you can look at the current national conditions in China.

    Any period of history has a different meaning over time. But as Chinese, being invaded, even if it eventually promotes China's development, is a shame that we cannot tolerate.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    On the one hand, it promotes the development of China's economy (e.g. in industry..On the other hand, the flood of foreign goods in the Chinese market has also hindered the development of China's economy

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    It forcibly opened China's long-closed country, used artillery to make the Chinese see clearly the gap between themselves and the world, and promoted China's determination to reform to a certain extent, but colonial plunder is plunder, which not only crushed the already fragile small peasant economy, but also flowed various resources ** that could have been used for China's own primitive accumulation abroad.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Western colonial aggression had a twofold impact on modern China.

    1. The colonial invasion brought destruction and disaster to the Chinese nation.

    2. Western colonial aggression also brought modern civilization to China, and also played a role in China's modernization that cannot be ignored. Therefore, we should make a realistic, correct and comprehensive evaluation based on history.

    From the results of the results, in a nutshell, the impact of Western colonial aggression on modern Chinese society should be reflected in the changes in the social structure of this process

    The catastrophe brought about by the aggression of the Western powers:

    1. The invasion of the Western powers turned the originally independent China into a semi-colonial and semi-feudal China, and the signing of a series of unequal treaties made the invading forces do whatever they wanted on Chinese soil.

    2. The aggression of the Western powers not only caused China to lose its political independence and autonomy, but also gradually formed a state of dependence on them economically and lost its independence.

    After opening the door to China with the cannon, they further expanded the dumping of goods and the export of capital to China through various unequal treaties, plundered and exploited China, controlled China's treaty ports, deprived China of its customs sovereignty through "negotiated tariffs", and extorted huge indemnities from China.

Related questions
7 answers2024-06-25

This statement is inaccurate.

A leased territory is a territory leased by a State to another State for a certain period of time for the purposes specified in the treaty in accordance with a treaty. The concept of leased land is a lease relationship borrowed from national law. Sovereignty over leased land is not transferred. >>>More

3 answers2024-06-25

In modern times, the colonial rule of the West over the East has caused great controversy. Some people see this as an irrational act of imperialism, while others see it as an important event that has promoted the development of the world. >>>More

8 answers2024-06-25

A brand is a specific set of features, benefits, and services that a seller provides to a buyer over a long period of time. Brand is an intangible asset that brings premium and value-added to the owner, and its carrier is the name, term, symbol, mark or design and combination used to distinguish it from the products or services of other competitors, and the source of value-added comes from the impression of its carrier formed in the minds of consumers. >>>More

25 answers2024-06-25

Something personally recommended by the General History of the World. Still very helpful. >>>More

12 answers2024-06-25

Compounds that are made up of cations (H+) during ionization are all hydrogen ions are called acids. >>>More