Is it better to have a Typhoon class fighter or a Rafale class fighter

Gusts of wind, the Array of Phoenix reached the level of three and a half generations.

I've seen Rafale-class fighters very good,

Who is stronger, the world's most famous European Typhoon fighter or the French Rafale fighter?

Rafale was developed by France alone; Typhoons are developed by many countries in the European Union; In terms of versatility, typhoons are stronger than gusts; But in terms of price, typhoons are much higher, and typhoons are half generations higher.

The performance of the typhoon is a little better, but the gap will not be very large, they are all the same grade aircraft, F16 is a light fighter, these two are heavy fighters, not the same level.

Compared with the F16, it is definitely advanced, but the Rafale and the Typhoon must have their own merits, France was also a partner of the Typhoon fighter at first, but later withdrew, because France felt that it was not suitable for him, so he independently developed the Rafale...

F16 should not be able to compete with Rafale and Typhoon. Typhoons are about the same as gusts. But looking at the gusts of wind is stronger.

The main difference between a typhoon and a gust is that a typhoon can cruise at supersonic speed.

Everything else is pretty much the same.

The gust is two and a half generations, the typhoon is three generations, and the decisive typhoon.

In terms of aerodynamic performance, the J-10 adopts a tailless coupling full-motion canard wing layout, and the wing-body fusion of the single-wing design combined with the delta wing makes its high-altitude, high-speed performance and low-altitude combat ability excellent.

In terms of on-board electronic equipment, the three-axis four-margin fly-by-wire control system is its biggest highlight, and the rocket ejection seat in the aircraft has reached the world's advanced level. All of the above is up to the performance of Europe's Typhoon and Rafale third-generation and a half generations.

However, in terms of man-machine interface, airborne radar and other key performance that represents the degree of automation, there is a relatively large gap between the J-10 and Rafale, especially the Typhoon, at best, it can only be a more typical third-generation aircraft.

In terms of airborne **, there is a slight gap between air combat ** and the West, but in terms of ground and sea attack means, it is far behind Europe, which has always attached importance to the multi-purpose of fighters, and ** has very little room for choice.

All things considered, J-10 is a fighter equivalent to the later stage of the third generation fighter, which is almost the same as the American F-16Block40, but it is a little behind the F-16E F (Block60) in electronic equipment, and is slightly stronger than the Russian Su-27SK, MiG-29MII, France's Mirage-2000 basic type, the United States' F-15J, F-16C D in terms of comprehensive capabilities, and individual performance may be backward, but the overall is not as good as the typhoon of the four European countries and the Rafale of France, the Russian Su-30MKI, a post-third-generation fighter similar to the Swedish JAS-39.

The Typhoon fighter is also known as the Eurofighter, it is jointly developed by many countries in Western Europe, when designed, pay attention to the agility of the aircraft and the ability to take off shortly, for this reason, the canard wing of the Typhoon fighter is very forward, just below the wheelhouse, and not like the J-10 and Rafale are behind the wheelhouse, the front canard wing of the Typhoon fighter has two benefits, increasing the agility of the flight and short take-off, just like we saw at the Paris Air Show, the Typhoon fighter has a small circling radius and a short take-off distance.