How about a Nikon D700 with 16 35 and 70 200? Please answer the master!!

It's undoubtedly a good camera, although the pixel ratio is slightly lower and it doesn't have a camera function. But there are all the advantages. At the moment, ** is an advantage.

This head can only be said to be decent, and the cost performance is relatively low. Although there is VR, wide-angle VR is inherently mediocre.

Moreover, the usefulness of ultra-wide is not as large as the standard. If you only buy two heads, 24-70 70-200 is recommended

If you go into the wide angle, there is no doubt about 14-24This is one of Nikon's best zoom wide-angle heads so far.

At 16mm, the distortion is also lower than that of other lenses of 24. At 24 o'clock, there is basically no distortion.

D700 + Nikon 16-35 4G VR+ Nikon 70-200 Ed VRII

Is this the case16-35 4 looks pretty good from the test on Mowgli, the second generation VR, 3 aspherical lenses, with D700 wide angle is quite strong.

70-200 is nothing to say, good head.

The only thing is that between 35 and 70, you have a missing section of the mid-focus, and this section is more commonly used on full-frame machines, so you have to find a way to fill it

Finally, you have two needs: ultra-wide angle and telephoto.

According to your existing lens, it is recommended to buy the same focal length as the existing two lenses, which will be wasteful. Don't buy 24-120, one is that the focal length is repeated, and the other is that the image quality is not good, and it is not good after adding a magnifier. 70-200 is a lot more expensive, but it's definitely worth it!

Reason: 1. The existing 35 2D landscape focal length is okay, and going back a little bit can fully meet the general needs. My D700 is still a 50 prime hang-up.

2. The Nikon 70-200 bamboo cannon is currently the best lens in this focal length, and it has been recognized by everyone in terms of materials, workmanship, and imaging. Not only can it effectively make up for the focal length of the existing lens, but also meet your needs to shoot a building from a long distance; And its large aperture of 85-135mm focal length can bring better bokeh effect to your portrait shots than 50 fixed focus.

In the future, if you really want to have an ultra-wide landscape lens, you can consider 20 or 24 for two fixed focal lengths, more than 2000 yuan. Similar to a double teleconverter**.

The lens is something that would rather be lacking than excessive, you are just like me, and you had to buy a 24-70 ruthlessly at that time, so you don't have to worry so much.

24-70 70-200 focal lengths are not repeated. Once you have it, look no further.

24-120 is equipped with a extender, isn't your wide angle wasted? Your aperture has also become smaller. There is also the effect on the focusing speed.

You have 50, you don't need an f4 aperture of 24-70, 24-120, if you think it's enough, pick it. If you are purely shooting architecture, you should move the tilt. On the telephoto end, you can consider either 180 or 300 4D.

24-70 is very practical to do hang-up head! 24-120 is not a grade of Dongdong!

If you choose only one. It can only be AFS 24-120G, if you are going to add lenses in the near future, you can choose 24-70 first. This focal length is used most frequently.

Such a match is not good.

The Nikon D610 is a full-width SLR body.

The Nikon lens, on the other hand, is a half-frame SLR lens.

Although the Nikon full-frame SLR body does not reject half-frame lenses, and even has a half-frame mode on the body that automatically switches to half-frame mode (DX) after attaching a half-frame lens, this is not suitable.

This is because, in half-frame mode, the image sensor has only about 40% of the imaging area in full-frame mode, which will lose a lot of pixels.

The D610 has a pixel value of 24 million, and in half-frame mode, the resolution can only reach 3936 2624, and the pixel value is only a little more than 10 million......This will result in a significant reduction in the size of the **.

Therefore, it is not appropriate to take D610 with this half-width 18-300.

aqui te amo。

This kind of lens is suitable for travel, that is, it is often said that the lens of a lens that goes all over the world is very average, and the picture quality is very average, and it can only be said that it is convenient, except for recording life, everything else is very general.

For beginners, it is best to use 18-105vr+35mm.

If you like telephoto, it is recommended to add a 70-300VR lens after a while. 18-200 is not recommended, as a recognized "one lens to go the world" lens, is the best one of all brands of 18-200mm lens, this lens 18-24mm focal length of the picture distortion control is poor, 24-100mm focal length imaging is not bad, 100-200mm focal length imaging quality is not good; Nearly full vignetting, 18mm end vignetting is more serious, and the narrowing aperture is not much improved, the center resolution is not bad at full aperture, reaching the highest level around f8, the edge resolution is always not high, and there is more serious dispersion.

The AF-S DX 35mm is one of the most generous lenses in Nikon's entry-level lens. Except for the slightly larger distortion, a little silly sharp, both the workmanship and the picture quality are worthy of it**。 It is mainly used to cultivate one's own photographic eye (lens sense) and blur the background.

Suitable for indoor portraits, street sweeping, and scenery;

AF-S DX 18-105mm F ed VR This lens has a focal length that is sufficient for daily use in portraits or landscapes, and the sharpness is very high, which is the most cost-effective and most used Nikon DX format lens. The downside is that distortion at the wide-angle end is poorly controlled, and there is slight vignetting at the telephoto end.

The AF-S VR 70-300mm F IF-ED lens is known as the "poor man's bull's head", nicknamed the little donkey cannon that kills the little steel cannon. And more users like to call it XLP (little wife). The VR II's vibration absorption function can meet the needs of handheld shooting for most of the time, and the image quality of the 70-200mm interfocal length is not inferior to that of the medium telephoto zoom head in any of Nikon's gold-ring lenses.

The only drawback is that the aperture is a little smaller, otherwise there would be no reason for the existence of the Nikon small steel cannon.

The 18-105 is one of Nikon's most cost-effective lenses, and I highly recommend you to get into this one.

The zoom ratio of 70-300 is a little larger, and the image quality may not be good, but if you don't particularly care about the image quality, you can play this one. Nikon's big triple is too expensive.

Lenses with too wide focal lengths are generally of average material. It is recommended to buy 2 lenses separately. The second one should be inferior to the 70-200 focal length.

When I use it for beginners, I recommend this combination of 18-105VR+

It's not simple Figure Economy 24-85 is light and enough for general occasions. 24-120 f4 higher. It's basically a one-shot world.

Nikon lenses are indeed more expensive than Canon, but the quality is also better than Canon, that's for sure. As for 24-70, forget it, it's basically a march with a big iron rod on your shoulder.

The 24-85 VR looks pretty good, Nikon claims that even the D800 can handle it, and it's certainly fine on the D600.

It's all on D600, of course you have to use your head well, 24, 70

For portraits,

50 1500 yuan, excellent portraits.