Why are the following two homonymous?

Personally, I think that the reason why they are said to be synonymous may be based on the following reasons:

1.Smith can be seen as an independent subject, and Mr. is also an independent referent, and the relationship between the two is juxtaposed, and there is no so-called who modifies whom. In the same way, Liu Hulan is an independent subject, and the martyr is also an independent referent, and the relationship between the two is also juxtaposed.

2."Homologous phrases, also known as compound phrases, are mostly composed of two parts, and the words of the preceding and following parts are different, but they refer to the same thing." The landlord himself can analyze that whether it is "Mr. Smith" or "Liu Hulan Martyr", the person who is referred to is the only one, and they are all the same person separately.

3."Of the two direct components, usually one refers to a more specific person, and the other refers to a more general", Smith is more specific, Mr. is a general referent, in the same way, Liu Hulan is also a specific person, and martyr is a generalization.

I fully agree with the interpretation of nujiang1983.

Actually, I understand your feelings very well. However, we can take an example, I have an older brother whose name is Tiezi. I can call him "Brother Tiezi" in front of him, and I can also say "This is my Brother Tiezi" when I introduce it to others.

It stands to reason that although there is only one Tiezi, there are countless brothers in the world, so the "Tiezi Brother" is suspected of having a positive structure. The question is, there are many types of definite expressions in the partial structure, which kind of definite does the definite "iron" belong to? We might as well assume that it is a subordinate term, so that the meaning of "Brother Tiezi" becomes "Brother Tiezi".

At this point, I'm afraid you won't agree either. You will definitely say, of course it doesn't mean that, "Brother Tiezi" means "Brother Tiezi", Tiezi is this brother, this brother is Tiezi. The examples you gave should also be understood in this way:

"Mr. Smith" is Mr. Smith, and "Martyr Liu Hulan" is the martyr Liu Hulan. And when we describe the meaning of this phrase in this way, doesn't it mean that this is a typical compound reference relationship? Isn't this phrase a typical synonymous phrase?

That's how I understand it.

Synonymous phrases are compound phrases. It refers to a phrase in which two words or phrases are used together to indicate the same person or thing, and together act as a component when entering a sentence. The two parts are composed, the grammatical status is the same, the referent content is the same, the meaning has a compound reference relationship, the structure is the same relationship, and the same component is made in the sentence.

For example, the capital Beijing, the capital is Beijing, and Beijing is also the capital. In the same way, in the two phrases you mentioned, Mr. Smith and Mr., Liu Hulan and Martyr refer to the same thing, and do the same thing in the sentence. If it is a partial phrase, the first part is biased, and the latter part is positive, and the status of the two is not the same, but there is a primary and secondary, such as the capital of China, which is the capital of China, China is biased, and the capital is positive, that is, the capital is the center of the phrase.

Questioner: The question of leaving the grass on the plain is in-depth and reasonable.

Liu Hulan was not the only martyr; And the "*** Prime Minister" in a specific period of time, there is only one Prime Minister, and it is the same relationship.

The former one is very far-fetched, don't be affected.

The study of Chinese grammar is still in its infancy, and it needs to be improved and studied in many places. We should advocate aspirants to devote their energies to contribute to the Chinese language of Everbright.

Words at the same level in the hierarchical word group are called homonyms, and their meanings have a variety of connections, including juxtaposition, synonymous and synonymous relations, antonymous relations, etc.

The copositional part is a sentence, which is the cognate clause.

Word groups can be divided into hierarchical and non-hierarchical relative word groups. The hierarchical relational word group includes four categories: the upper and lower relative word groups, the whole part relational word group, the hierarchical relational word group, and the kinship word group, among which the whole partial relational word group can be divided into the relationship between large numbers and decimals, the relationship between the whole and the components, and the relationship between the whole and its members.

Non-hierarchical relational word groups are subject word groups listed according to the needs of different research purposes, such as words with the same syllables, words with the same vowel, and words that express action behaviors.

The same words in the hierarchical word group have the following relationships: juxtaposition, synonymous and synonymous, and antonym.

Appositive. A noun (or other form) that modifies, qualifies, or describes another noun or pronoun is a homonyus. Homonyms should be consistent with the case of the word it qualifies, and often close together.

1.A structure consisting of two or more linguistic units of the same level, where the former term is the same as the latter term and has the same syntactic function, and the latter term is the coposition of the former term.

2.Just like when the verb is closely related to its isotope, it is not separated by commas; If the isotope is only supplemented by a verb, it can be separated by a comma.

3.Isotopes can also denote part of the meaning in addition to the full meaning of their allisotopic components.