Is it against the law for a man to take goods that have been washed out of the flood?

Is it against the law for a man to take goods that have been washed out of the flood?

2020 is destined to be an extraordinary year, at the beginning of the year, we have experienced the test of the new crown pneumonia in the world, and so far, we are still accepting and learning to fight. At the same time, in 2020, there was a drought in the south and the north, and in recent months, heavy rains in the south have flooded crops, washed down roads, and even washed away homes<>

In fact, our things are divided into ownery and ownerless, which is understood literally as something that has a master and something that does not have a master, and on the other hand, things are divided into movable property and immovable property. Possession of movable property is ownership, while possession of immovable property is subject to registration. Therefore, the items that were washed out of the flood are generally movable property, and if they are picked up at this time, they can theoretically be taken for themselves and do not violate the law.

And if the family flees because of the flood, and when the flood waters recede, someone else takes possession of a house, then the owner comes back and can claim ownership, because the house as real estate needs to be registered before it can be owned. <>

There may be some valuables that are washed out, such as gold rings, gold necklaces, etc., when the owner comes to the door, from the moral level, we should return it to the owner, and according to the principle that lost property does not apply to the principle of good faith acquisition, the owner knows that his things are lost in **, it is a lost property, if the illegal possession refuses to return, it is likely to commit the crime of embezzlement. Therefore, this issue cannot be predetermined, but should be considered according to the specific situation. In the face of natural disasters, everyone is a victim, everyone should help each other, and should not be greedy for a little cheap, and destroy everyone's friendship, because in the face of natural disasters, only human beings can help each other, and the sky is destroying us at this time.

If it is a small item of invaluable importance, such as food, if you are really hungry, you can eat it, because at this time he can save your life, and these consumables that you eat are originally possession.

In 2020, we carried the new crown pneumonia together, when the new crown pneumonia began to spread from Wuhan to the whole country, our country did not give up on any of us, our medical team is also working hard to help each of us, China is a united country, we will overcome all difficulties. <>

2020 will be the final year of our well-off, no matter what the outcome, defeating the new crown pneumonia is our greatest achievement, as a populous country, our mortality rate is not high, and our course research is also going on. I believe that China will overcome all difficulties. Unity is a traditional Chinese virtue, and we have defeated aggression with unity, and we have also overcome all difficulties with unity.

You can't take advantage of the fire to rob, typical improper enrichment, don't be ashamed.

It does not rise to the level of a crime, but if the owner refuses to return it when he finds it, it is an illegal occupation of other people's property.

From a moral point of view, if you pick up someone else's things and return them to the original owner, if from a legal point of view, if you pick up something more valuable or of higher value, and the original owner comes and asks for it back, and you don't return it to others, then you break the law, and if it's just a cheap thing, you can't talk about breaking the law.

This is still more difficult to say, if the item is ownerless, it should not violate the law, such as the big carp in the water, but if it is an owner, it is difficult to say.

In fact, according to the laws of the country, it depends on what kind of things the man obtained in the flood, if it is more valuable, then it is a crime, if it is a relatively cheap thing, then it is not a crime.

A man who obtains items washed out by the flood is triggering the laws of the country, and illegally obtaining other people's finances is punishable by prison according to the regulations!

The act of a man taking an item that has been washed out by a floodIt's not illegalThese items were taken out of the possession of the right holder due to natural disasters, and after passers-by picked them up, a new relationship of possession was established, rather than an all-ownership relationship.

But,From a moral point of view, passers-by should return the salvaged items to their original owners

On the basis of article 270 of the Criminal Law [Crime of Embezzlement], where the property of others in custody is illegally taken for oneself, and the amount is relatively large, and the amount is refused, a sentence of up to two years imprisonment, short-term detention or a fine is to be given; where the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances, a sentence of between two and five years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given.

Where the forgotten or buried items of others are illegally taken into their own possession, and the amount is relatively large, and they refuse to hand it over, punishment is to be given in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

It's not a crime, well, the man was able to get some property in the flood for us men, and then, I can only say that I picked it up accidentally, and then, if he is still paying it back, he must pay it back, but if he wants to pay it back if he doesn't have a lost owner, then he doesn't have a crime.

The man retrieves items washed out by the flood. Not suspected of a crime. for he was swept out by the flood. It is an unclaimed item. Everyone has the right to him.

It is not a crime for a man to take an object that has been washed out by the flood, because it does not determine the real owner, the so-called ownerless object, and anyone has the right to take it for himself. It is not a crime for a man to take an object that has been washed out by the flood, because it does not determine the real owner, the so-called ownerless object, and anyone has the right to take it for himself. It is not a crime for a man to take an object that has been washed out by the flood, because it does not determine the real owner, the so-called ownerless object, and anyone has the right to take it for himself.

It is not a crime for a man to take an object that has been washed out by the flood, because it does not determine the real owner, the so-called ownerless object, and anyone has the right to take it for himself. It is not a crime for a man to take an object that has been washed out by the flood, because it does not determine the real owner, the so-called ownerless object, and anyone has the right to take it for himself.

It is against the law for a man to obtain goods washed out of the flood for nothing.

The man who obtained the items washed out by the flood is not suspected of committing a crime. It is neither stealing, nor robbing, nor stealing. is an accidental acquisition of finances. If the item is very precious. The master, come to the door and should return it to the owner.

I think the first thing to do is to find out whether the items that were washed away by the flood are valuable, whether they are within the scope of the looting that was washed away, and if so, it is an act that is suspected of a crime, and if the items are washed away from a relatively distant place, the items can be obtained, so that they are not suspected of committing a crime.

The items that the man obtained were not his own, and I felt that it should be a crime, not his own, so why should he take it? Right?

Only get items that have been washed out by floods. It is not a crime. However, if these items are lost, they must be exchanged when they are found.

I think this is also a crime, so you can't take anything that was washed out of the flood directly home, and if you take it, it's also a crime.

I don't think it's necessarily a crime for a man to take things that were washed out of the flood, because after all, the flood washed them out, and he took them up, and if he didn't take them, he was washed away, so I don't think it's a crime, it depends on the circumstances.

Men who obtain items that do not belong to themselves, finances, of course, are suspected of crimes.

, valuables. Crisis.. It should be handed over to the relevant departments in a timely manner. The police station came to the ** department. Generally, five pieces don't need to be handed in, or I'll sprinkle them.

It is suspected of a crime to be lazy to get an item washed out by the flood, and this is also a suspected crime, and once a driver or public figure goes to rescue him and distribute it to those who have suffered from the disaster, it is his own family's talent, not his own family, how can you take away the items from others? This is also a crime, and it is considered robbery.

Of course, there will be no suspicion of a crime.

A man's actions are unjust enrichment, and if the value of the item is high, then the man is suspected of committing a crime.

It should not be a crime for a man to obtain goods that have been washed out of the flood, but it is also a violation of other people's property. If the owner is found, it should be returned.

I think that the items that were washed out by the flood, and they are ordinary items, and no one has come to claim them, and they belong to the ownerless items, which can be obtained by other people, in this case, it should not constitute a crime, after all, the main reason is that the flood washed out, not the man who took the initiative to obtain it.

If the items washed out by the flood can be found, of course, they will be returned to the owner, and some of them cannot be identified as belonging to whom, so it should not be considered a crime for him to take them for himself.

The man's belongings washed out by the flood were not suspected of a crime, he picked them up.

The man who obtained items washed by the flood is not suspected of committing a crime. But if it is a huge amount of property or involves individuals. Property. If someone comes looking for it, it should be turned in.

It is difficult to find the owner when the flood is washed out, and if no one claims it, it is not a crime to obtain something that is not too valuable.

Separately, if the items washed out by the flood are considered unimportant by others, it is not a crime, and if the valuables or secrets are not handed in, it is a crime.

Obtaining items that have been washed out by the flood and giving them to them if someone comes to claim them, and leaving them if no one claims them, is not suspected of committing a crime.

The man retrieves items washed out by the flood. Already suspected of a crime.

Recently, it has been raining frequently in recent months because of the country. This has led to flooding in many areas. Many families' houses have also been destroyed, and the things in the houses have also drifted to other places because of the flood, so there are many people who will pick up leaks during the flood and pick up some of their own supplies in the flood, of course, this is not their own, but other people's things, because the flood came over, so there are many people who think that it is a crime for a man to obtain other people's belongings in the floodIn fact, according to the laws of the country, it depends on what kind of things the man obtained in the flood, if it is more valuable, then it is a crime, if it is a relatively cheap thing, then it is not a crime.

Nowadays, many people will be greedy for small and cheap, so they often pick up some other people's belongings in some places or places where there is chaos, sell them for money or take them home for use, from the moral point of view of our Chinese society, we pick up his things from the other side is actually stealing, but these things are washed away because of natural disastersTherefore, it may be that the original owner of the thing will not be held accountable because other people take it, unless it is a more valuable item, so many people will pick up some other people's things in exchange for benefits. <>

In fact, from our moral point of view, the right thing to do is for us to pick up these items and return them to their original owners, but if the original owners cannot be found due to the dispersion of the flood, those who pick up the objects will take advantage of them. Moreover, in the criminal law, the so-called such a crime must be a relatively large amount of money and a relatively high value, and the refusal to hand it over is a violation of the law, so in general, it depends on whether the original owner of the item wants to return the item and whether the value of the item is high, otherwise it cannot involve criminal issues. <

It is considered a suspected crime, which is a legal unearned gain. In any case, we still have to carry forward the spirit of collecting gold.

From a legal point of view, a man is not suspected of committing a crime when he obtains items washed out by the flood, but if he is suspected of violating the law, this kind of thing still needs to be handed over to the state, because it is not his personal belongings.

In fact, it should be considered a crime, because it is not his belongings, and it is also considered to be a crime of theft.

If you get valuables, you are suspected of committing a crime, and if you are not, you are not illegal.