How will the law determine the liability of a 90 year old lady who fell down in a car and suffered a

Living in this society, maybe we will meet a lot of people, maybe some particularly heart-warming things will happen in life, and there will be many heart-warming moments, which will move us very much. We saw a 90-year-old lady who fell down on a car and broke a bone, and then claimed compensation from her, and I think the law will be reasonable to determine the responsibility for this matter. <>

1. The ninety-year-old lady fell down and broke a bone in a car, and then claimed to it In everyone's life, we will meet many people and experience many things, and everyone we meet will bring you a different experience. We have information that a 90-year-old lady fell down on a car and suffered a fracture, and then claimed compensation from her. Maybe this situation often happens in our social life, sometimes we encounter an old lady who falls down and wants to help her, but people only touch the porcelain.

But I believe that this old lady came from herself, and really wanted to help others, but then she accidentally fell and broke a bone. We will see a lot of such old things in life, and we also hope that such positive energy can be passed on in the society, and when others need help, they can extend their helping hand to help those in need. The positive energy of society is inherited by everyone.

2. The law will reasonably determine the responsibility I personally believe that this old lady of Jiuxing wanted to help others after seeing them fall, but accidentally broke a bone, and then claimed compensation from her. The law will judge according to the situation, if the old lady is in a state of uncaused, he went to help the car out of his love, and as a result, he caused a fracture, then she has the right to claim compensation from her, and can help her reduce some medical expenses. Everyone may encounter this or that problem in their own lives, and if one day we encounter a situation like this old lady, then we can claim compensation from her.

Because the old lady is out of her own love to help others to help the car, which is an act of management without cause, so she can have a reason to claim compensation from her after causing a fracture. But in the end, how can the law solve this problem? We're looking forward to it too.

But we will believe the law, he will be reasonably responsible, and at the same time he will give the old lady a reasonable explanation. <>

Life is to have it while losing any period of time should be grateful, natural joy, bumpy road, and not necessarily a disaster. We will encounter things like the old lady in our lives, and if one day we also cause damage because of the act of uncaused management, then we can ask others for some compensation.

It will be determined that there is no duty of care because the law stipulates that people need to provide a certain duty of care to vulnerable groups such as the elderly.

This old lady volunteered to help with the car, and she shouldn't claim medical expenses from him if something happened, but from a human point of view, this old lady helped you, but there was an accident when you helped you, so you still have to help out.

I think the old lady will be held fully responsible. Because from a legal point of view, the old lady's support for the car is purely her personal action and personal will. Falls are accidental.

If it is because the owner of the car parked indiscriminately, it is necessary to bear a certain legal responsibility, the old lady is a kind move to help the car, but the owner is also a disaster, I hope the law has a fair judgment.

The ninety-year-old lady suffered a fracture caused by a fall in her own car, and she had nothing to do with the car owner, but then claimed compensation from the car owner, then this is immoral and even illegal. To put it simply, it is to touch porcelain. So I think the law will definitely hold the old lady fully responsible.

Regarding this matter, the relevant lawyer said that no matter whether the old man wanted to move the car with good intentions or wanted to help the car when he was tired, even if the owner did not do it intentionally, just because the owner parked it indiscriminately, then he should bear some responsibility.

The law will certainly not support the old lady, if everyone encounters this situation, then can the car owner compensate for it? If no one asks you to help the car, do you have to pay compensation if you fall?

Legal analysis: unilateral accidents, this situation can not be reported to the traffic police (small accidents, does not affect road safety), directly reported to the insurance company. The cost of hospitalization needs to be compensated, and you can negotiate the cost of recuperation, after all, this cost is not easy to determine.

Legal basis: "Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases" Article 17: Where a victim suffers personal injury, the compensation obligor shall compensate for all expenses incurred due to medical treatment** and the loss of income due to lost work, including medical expenses, lost work expenses, nursing expenses, transportation expenses, accommodation expenses, hospital meal subsidies, and necessary nutrition expenses. If the victim is disabled due to injury, the compensation obligor shall also compensate for the necessary expenses incurred by the victim due to the increase in living needs and the loss of income caused by the loss of the ability to work, including disability compensation, disability assistive device expenses, and living expenses for dependents, as well as the necessary expenses, nursing expenses, and follow-up expenses actually incurred due to nursing care and continuation.

Where the victim dies, the compensation obligor shall, in addition to compensating the relevant expenses provided for in the first paragraph of this article on the basis of the circumstances of the rescue, also compensate for the funeral expenses, the living expenses of the dependents, the death compensation expenses, and other reasonable expenses such as transportation expenses, lodging expenses, and lost work expenses incurred by the victim's relatives in handling funeral matters.

The case of compensation for the child who hit the old man and broke the bone. A 6-year-old boy riding a balance bike suddenly rushed out and knocked the old man down, causing him to fracture his three ankles. The results of the forensic appraisal showed that the function of the left ankle joint of the elderly was lost by more than 50%, constituting a grade 10 disability.

The two parties could not reach an agreement on the compensation issue, so the old man sued the other party in court. The court held that the boy's parents did not take responsibility for guardianship, resulting in the injury of the old man, and should be compensated. After mediation, the defendant compensated the elderly for medical expenses, nutrition expenses, and disability compensation totaling 120,000 yuan.