In the case that the man himself is able to buy the house in full, should the man s parents still pa

I have grown up, and since I have the conditions to buy a house, I should not let the man's parents pay any more. After all, our parents gave birth to us and raised us, and we have spent a lot of money and effort, and we will try to leave their help when we have the ability to do so, and we must be self-reliant. If you don't have the conditions, then there is no way, you have to rely on the help of your parents, but in this kind of situation, we try to be independent by ourselves.

Don't rely too much on your parents. In this way, we will be able to grow up, and when we grow up, we will be able to let our parents rely on us.

Normally, if you can buy a house independently and conditionally in full, you shouldn't ask your parents to pay anymore Because you can be independent, don't let your parents help anymore However, there is no provision for this If your parents are very rich, you must pay for it In order to make your parents happy, you can also accept it Usually you can repay your parents by honoring your parents If your parents are not rich, there is no need to let your parents pay Compare your parents when you are old, it is better to let your parents keep a little money for a pension.

Since it is the south that has the conditions to buy a house in full, should the parents pay for it? It depends on the specific situation, if the parents have a lot of money, of course, they also give a part of the children, so that it shows the concern of the parents, especially in the case of several children, to a bowl of water!

If the man has the ability to buy a house on his own, he does not need his parents to pay for it. You don't have to worry about who will pay for the man in the future. Don't let this affect your feelings.

This is not a question of whether it should be or not, since it is best to have money and do not need your parents' money, do you still have to ask your parents for money? If the parents are very good financially and are willing to contribute some money to help their children, it is okay to accept them, since they have them, it is best not to, the parents are old, keep some money, have more money on hand, want to enjoy how good life is, and go out to travel.

They are no longer there, and the money is not the son's.

Since the man himself has the conditions to buy a house in full, I don't think he should rely on his parents, and at any time through his own efforts and his own ability, what he gets is the most precious.

The man's parents can not leave. The man can buy a house by himself, and there is no need to worry about his parents.

In the case that the man himself is able to buy the house in full, should the man's parents still pay for it? In fact, I don't have to rely on my parents if I think I have the ability, and I still rely on my own ability at any time.

This friend can live a chic life by supporting himself.

In the case that the man himself is able to buy the house in full, the man's parents should not pay for it.

Legal Analysis:1The parents contribute in full after marriage, and the house is registered in the names of their children. It is considered a gift from the parents to one of their children, i.e. the house is owned by the child and is not jointly owned by the husband and wife.

2.The parents contribute partially, and the rest of the payment is paid by both spouses. The parents do not have the right to take ownership of the house, so they cannot decide to donate the house to their children and register the house in their children's names.

In view of the fact that the property right of the house is registered in the name of the funder and its own children, it is more reasonable and legal to recognize the part of the parents' capital contribution as a gift only to their own children.

3.One parent contributes the capital, and the property rights of the house are registered in the name of the other parent. According to the rule of thumb, unless the parties can provide a written agreement or statement at the time of the parent's contribution to prove that the parent has expressly stated that the gift to the spouse of the child should generally be deemed to be a gift to both husband and wife.

4.One of the parents contributes the capital, and the property right of the house is registered in the name of both husband and wife. The house shall be recognized as the joint property of the husband and wife.

5.The parents of both parties contributed capital before marriage, and the property rights of the house were registered in the names of the children of both parties. It should be deemed to be a personal gift to each child, and the use of the donated funds by the children of both parties to purchase a house is naturally equivalent to an act of personal contribution.

Correspondingly, regardless of whether the children of the two parties are married or who registered the ownership of the house, it shall be deemed that the children share the ownership of the house according to their respective share of contributions.

6.The parents of both parties contribute capital after marriage, and the property rights of the house are registered in the names of the children of both parties. It shall be deemed to be a gift to both husband and wife, unless the parents expressly express the gift to the empty party.

Legal basis: Article 1062 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Where a house is rented by one party before marriage and purchased with joint property after marriage, and the house ownership certificate is registered in the name of one party, it shall be recognized as the joint property of the husband and wife. When the parties cannot reach an agreement on the value and ownership of the house in the joint property of the husband and wife, the people's court shall handle it separately according to the following circumstances:

1) If both parties claim the ownership of the house and agree to obtain it through bidding, it shall be permitted;

2) If one party claims the ownership of the house, the appraisal agency shall evaluate the house according to the market, and the party that obtains the ownership of the house shall give the other party corresponding compensation;

3) If neither party claims the ownership of the house, the house shall be auctioned according to the application of the parties, and the proceeds shall be divided;

If there is a dispute between the parties at the time of divorce over a house that has not yet been acquired or full ownership has not yet been obtained, and the negotiation fails, the people's court should not make a judgment on the ownership of the house, and shall make a judgment to be used by the parties according to the actual situation. After the parties have fully obtained the ownership of the house in accordance with the regulations, if there is a dispute, they may separately file a lawsuit with the people's court. If, before the parties get married, the parents contributed to the purchase of a house for both parties, the contribution shall be deemed to be a personal gift to their children, unless the parents expressly express the gift to both parties.

Legal analysis: After marriage, the parents of one of the parents contribute money to their children to buy a house, and if the parents contribute to the purchase of a house for both parties after marriage, the contribution shall be deemed to be a gift to both husband and wife, unless the parents expressly express the gift to one party. However, if the property rights of the movable property purchased by one of the parents for the children of one of the parents for the children of the investor after marriage are registered in the name of the children of the investor, it shall be regarded as a gift to only one of the children, and the immovable property shall be recognized as the personal property of one of the spouses.

Legal basis: Article 1062 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China The following property acquired by husband and wife during the existence of the marital relationship is the joint property of the husband and wife and shall be jointly owned by the husband and wife

1) Wages, bonuses, and remuneration for labor services;

2) Income from production, operation and investment;

3) income from intellectual property rights;

4) Inherited or donated property, except as provided for in item 3 of Article 1063 of this Law;

5) Other property that shall be jointly owned. Husband and wife have equal rights to dispose of joint property.

Legal analysis: The property obtained by inheritance or gift is jointly owned by the husband and wife, but the property that is determined in the will or gift contract to belong to only one of the husband or wife is the property of one of the husband and wife. That is to say, if the parents clearly give only one person to the son in the gift contract, it should be the son's personal property.

Legal basis: Article 1144 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Where there are obligations attached to a testamentary succession or bequest, the heirs or legatees shall perform the obligations. If they fail to perform their obligations without a legitimate reason, the people's court may, at the request of the interested parties or relevant organizations, revoke their right to accept part of the inheritance of the Fuyi Bridge Wu Wu Transport.

Summary. See, this is not mandatory, it depends on the wishes of the parents. According to the relevant provisions of China's Civil Code and relevant judicial interpretations, after marriage, the parents of one of the parents contribute money to their children to buy a house, and if the parents contribute to the purchase of a house for both parties after marriage, the contribution shall be deemed to be a gift to both husband and wife, unless the parents expressly express the gift to one party.

However, if the property rights of the immovable property purchased for the children by one of the parents after marriage are registered in the name of the children of the investor, it shall be regarded as a gift to only one of the children, and the immovable property shall be recognized as the personal property of one of the spouses.

Hello, I am a consulting lawyer who asks questions, and I am very happy to serve you Hello, I am a cooperative lawyer, and I am happy to serve you.

Did you see the question I posted.

See, this is not mandatory, it depends on the wishes of the parents. According to the relevant provisions of China's Civil Code and relevant judicial interpretations, if the parents of one of the parents contribute money to their children to buy a house after a deficit marriage, and if the parents contribute to the purchase of a house for both parties after marriage, the contribution shall be deemed to be a gift to both husband and wife, unless the parents expressly express the gift to one party. However, if the immovable property purchased by one of the parents for the child after marriage is registered in the name of the investor's child, it shall be regarded as a gift to only one of the children, and the immovable property shall be deemed to be the personal property of one of the husband and wife.

After marriage, is it too much for the woman's parents to ask the man to buy a house at the woman's house?

This is your family matter, you need to negotiate and solve it yourself, I can't comment on it. That.

Well. I'm glad to answer for you this time! If you are satisfied with my above targeted reply, you can give me a like, and click on my avatar to follow, so that you can conduct targeted consultation. The platform cooperates with the lawyer and waits for the next time to solve your problems!

Summary. Hello After marriage, the man's parents pay to buy a house, which is generally not recoverable, because this is a gift, and the ownership of the house belongs to the children.

After marriage, the man's parents paid for the house, and now the man's parents want to get the money back.

Hello After marriage, the man's parents give their grandchildren money to buy a house, which generally cannot be recovered, because this is a gift, and the ownership of the house belongs to the children.

Legal basis: Article 663 of the Civil Code Whether the donor can revoke the gift under any of the following circumstances: (1) seriously infringing upon the lawful rights and interests of the donor or the donor's close relatives; (2) Failure to perform the obligation to support the donor; (3) The first person fails to perform the obligations stipulated in the gift contract.

The donor's right of revocation shall be exercised within one year from the date on which the donor knew or should have known the reasons for revocation.