The United States is a veritable war empire , why are Americans so aggressive?

Americans are known to be aggressive, and they are not just aggressive because of military might.

is strong, but also because of their crazy pursuit of interests and the tyrannical factor in their bones.

1. The United States' frenzied pursuit of interests has led to their extreme aggressiveness.

The greed of Americans in pursuit of profit is already well known. They never seem to be satisfied, and will flock to them whenever they see benefits, completely devoid of humanitarianism.

Even at the expense of waging war to gain benefits. Many people think that the United States is aggressive, but in essence, Americans are too greedy, and it is greed that leads to their aggressiveness. As long as the United States can see the benefits, they will not stop the belligerent pace, Iraq.

It's the best proof of that. The United States wants to maintain its hegemony, and their greedy pursuit of profit never stops.

2. The tyrannical factor in the American body is at work.

The Americans are not only greedy but also tyrannical, they keep talking about humanitarianism, but in fact they themselves are like vicious dogs. The tyrannical factor has always inhabited the body of the Americans, and they will be summoned at any time, and they have no sympathy in front of the weak, and only think about conquest and violation, which is the pursuit of interests, but also a physical shortcoming. Americans are tyrannical, so being aggressive and aggressive is a manifestation of their tyrannical character, as well as a character flaw of this nation, and in the face of anything, their first thought is to conquer by force and be unreasonable.

3. The United States has always lived in the dream of hegemony.

In the past, the United States was indeed a superpower.

However, with the development of the world, the dream of hegemony of the United States will eventually be shattered, but the United States is not enough for the overall historical situation, and has always wanted to hegemonically maintain this dream of hegemony will not be broken. And one way they can maintain their dream of hegemony is to be aggressive. The United States has always maintained that force is the solution to all problems and the killer weapon for maintaining its hegemony.

But in fact, the status of a country does not lie in its powerlessness, but in people's hearts. Only by respecting everyone can we be respected, and the so-called convincing people with reason and being unreasonable will never truly gain respect, but it is a pity that the United States does not recognize this.

It is because the United States is a country that produces **, if there is no war, then their ** will not be sold, so they will take the initiative to provoke a war and become a war empire.

The Americans are particularly aggressive, and the main reason is that only when the Americans continue to provoke wars can they make money, so the United States is now engaged in all kinds of small actions.

Because Americans are naturally belligerent and have aggressive genes in their bones, Americans are so aggressive.

Stronger than the United States, there is no such thing on the planet. So they've been exploring aliens.

On Earth, it is a bully against anyone. So this question, I don't know how.

The United States has never fought a war with a matching big and powerful country, and it often bullies the small, bullies the weak, and fights together with a group of allies, and has no confidence to fight alone? Such as North Korea, Iraq, Libya, ......and other countries, only picking up these soft persimmon countries to bully relatives to show off their might, but in fact, they are a paper tiger.

I don't know if Iraq is not a strong country by raising its hand?

If Iraq is not considered a great power, then the United States has not had a war with a great power since World War II.

And what about the Hanxian War?

Just listen to the name of our army, and you will know. It's called the Volunteer Army. Nominally composed of volunteers. There was no declaration of war between the two countries.

This war was a very unexpected war for the United States. MacArthur did not believe that it was the main force of our army until he engaged the volunteers.

It is considered to be only a guerrilla force composed of volunteers. Still convinced that it was possible to end the war by Christmas.

With the First and Second Campaigns frustrated, MacArthur wanted to expand the war. And this is inconsistent with Truman's strategy.

So Truman**, almost in a humiliating way, dismissed MacArthur from office.

When MacArthur returned home, he was greeted with a hero's triumphant courtesy. Published second-in: "I'll be back." The famous saying: "Veterans do not die, they will slowly wither." ”

There are four words in the United States to describe MacArthur.

Defenders of Australia. Liberator of the Philippines. Conqueror of Japan. Defender of the DPRK.

After five battles, the United States already believed that it had achieved its goal of war. All that remains is a conflict to gain weight for negotiations.

If Stalin had died sooner, or Eisenhower had come to power earlier, the war would have ended sooner. Of course, the war could also expand.

The Americans did not admit that they had lost the Korean War. I don't think I'm doing my best.

The losses of the Korean War were not much different from those of the Vietnam War. Since the United States at that time was the United States that had experienced World War II, their mental strength was far greater than that of the Vietnam War.

There is not much psychological trauma for the United States. Film literature is relatively less than that of the Vietnam War.

Americans are used to it. The United States is often at war, and this is a characteristic of this nation, and many Americans have become accustomed to it.

I think Americans see this as an act of justice. Because in their minds, they are the world's policemen and have the right to maintain global peace.

The Americans themselves feel that there is nothing wrong with it, that is, for the sake of their own national interests.

Yes, fight Iraq, at the time of the Gulf War, Iraq could be said to be the fourth most powerful country in the world, and it was not the same as being hung up and beaten by the United States.

At present, all the wars of the United States are fought with countries that are weaker than itself, and it has not yet fought with real powers, and it has fought first-class wars with powerful countries.

The United States first overthrew the great "empire on which the sun never sets" at that time, and then overthrew Mexico, which was the hegemon of the Americas at that time (New Mexico was snatched from Mexico), and directly turned a developed country into a third world country, and then overturned Nazi Germany, which had the highest army strength in Europe, and Japan, which ranked among the top three in the world in naval strength, and also entangled with the Soviet Union for more than 50 years.

During the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, although there was no head-to-head confrontation, it fought against the Soviet Union in almost every field, and in the end the United States won, and the Cold War ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union.

No. Since its founding, the United States has never had a large-scale war with any country, let alone a war against a great power.

How did the United States become independent, there is no need to ask, people participate in any war, and the pile of European and Japanese powers in World War II is plastic.

Japan and Germany are not considered powerhouses? Moreover, the Soviet Union was a soldier who surrendered without a fight, a victory that was more advanced than a traditional victory.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union by the United States, the United States became the only great power in the world.

The United States is the best interpreter of the surrender of the United States without a fight, thinking that the United States and the Soviet Union overturned the so-called powerful Soviet Union without spending a single shot in the struggle for hegemony.

Use your brains, Germany, Japan, Italy, he is awesome.

No, Germany and Japan were weak back then!!

The USSR was enough for him to show off for the rest of his life.

Germany and Japan were not considered great powers during World War II??

Is there only one form of war in which national competition is conducted? If the two can't get along, they generally won't tear their faces and do it, right?

Hey, it takes a lot of common sense to ask this kind of question. Can you become a superpower without winning? , use your brain, okay?

First, let's take a political perspective.

What is the role of the United States in the full perspective? International policeman, also a gangster big brother; When you see what you need, you reach out and ask for it, and if you don't want it, you will fight, but after all, you need resources and not waste resources, so you can only negotiate while fighting, and when the negotiation is completed, you will not fight.

Because of this, it creates the impression that the United States is belligerent.

Military perspective. The United States is a bit poor in strategic resources, and it is cut into two by Canada, and if Mexico and Canada attack at the same time, it will have no way back, so the United States must maintain its military strength and need that kind of formidable image; And theory and ** alone are not enough - it has to train troops!

Africa is always at war, there are all kinds of **, and it is a good place to train troops, so the United States fights more in Africa.

Why is the United States so belligerent and shirking? In the final analysis, it is the loss of having no culture!

Why is the United States so keen on foreign wars? After reading it, it dawned on me!

The national interest of the United States dictates that the United States must be so!

Only when the national strength of the United States has declined, and the ability of the United States to control key regions and countries has weakened, has the United States laid down its butcher's knife and become a Buddha. The reason for this is essentially that capitalism is the source of modern warfare. Here's why:

First, after World War II, the US military was out of the need to contain fascist countries, and stationed troops in various relevant regions of the world to exercise control. So far, the number of U.S. overseas bases has reached 582.

Second, after the international community broke away from the gold standard in 1971, countries around the world used the dollar as their national currency. In order to ensure the credit of the dollar country, it is necessary to ensure hegemony with the military, and it is necessary to deploy troops in all countries of the world to defend the national interests of the United States.

Third, almost half of the value of U.S. industrial output is the arms industry. A large number of military ** are stored in American warehouses. If it can't be sold, then the U.S. economy is in a stalemate.

In order to break the impasse in the U.S. economy, it is necessary to create unrest and tension for the countries concerned to buy the United States**. After all, arms are the most profitable. So it was decided that the US foreign policy was restless.

Third, oil and energy are large international transactions, and if oil transactions can be settled in US dollars, the United States can collect a large amount of printing taxes. Although there are many international currencies in the world, such as the US dollar, the euro, the yen, etc., the practice of international counterparts is that oil must be combined with the US dollar.

In order to ensure the implementation of this matter, the US military has deployed troops in the Middle East and Latin America, which are rich in oil and natural gas, to ensure the hegemony of the US dollar.

Fourth, for countries that dare to say no, we will carry out color revolutions and peaceful evolution. Support the puppet regime and obey the orders of the United States of America. With regard to countries where peaceful evolution cannot be effective, we should adopt the method of starting a war to intimidate the hungry or directly find a reason for the concession of democracy, human rights, and freedom, and use the fallacy of human rights above sovereignty to unite several countries with similar smells to wage war.

In fact, although the world wars in recent decades have nothing to do with the United States, under normal circumstances, the countries that can be frightened by the United States will not evolve peacefully; Those who can make color revolutions will not be intimidated by war, and those who can be intimidated by war will not be solved by war.

Before the outbreak of the Gulf War, Iraq and Iran had been fighting for eight years over a border dispute. During the eight-year war, the two countries fought fiercely, resulting in the death of a large number of people, and the total military expenditure and economic damage caused by the war amounted to more than 600 billion US dollars.