Think by killing religion and science

1. The restaurant is killing every day, and live fish, chickens, and other animals are killed, Buddha.

The religion advocates not killing, but if you don't kill, won't the hotel be closed?

Whether the hotel closes or not can be seen as a problem in economics. According to economics, there is no absolute relationship between whether to kill or not and whether the hotel is closed or not. (It's too complicated to say, the key to whether the restaurant closes or not is whether the consumer has this demand, as for whether the restaurant only cooks vegetarian dishes and has to close, this is not necessarily related.)

2. Will chefs kill people with a short life?

The consequences of the cook's killing are not only suffered by the cook, but also by all beings who cause the consequences, such as those who eat meat, those who raise animals to sell to restaurants. It is difficult for people who do not know the truth of cause and effect to understand the details. But where there is a cause, there must be an effect, and this effect is far beyond the imagination of us ordinary people.

3. Is there a scientific basis for the consequences of not killing in Buddhism, such as "if you kill fish and snakes, etc., those who live long will also have a short life"? Are the current natural sciences and religion at some point at odds?

This is the conclusion reached by a person who is well aware of cause and effect in Buddhism through the observation of facts, and it can be said that this is already said after the facts, and science may not be able to explain some things, which can only say that science has a lot of unknown factors to study, but science says that existence is truth. It already exists, it is a fact, just as it is difficult for science to understand Chinese medicine perfectly, the so-called meridians cannot be proven by science, but the facts prove everything, so it is called practical science, in fact, it is incomprehensible to science and does exist.

If you don't kill, won't the hotel be closed? Ans: It doesn't have to be that good.

The crime of killing a lower life is relatively light. ex: sea cucumber, jellyfish skin. Eggs are also available.

Is there a scientific basis? ANS: It's karma, and it may only be retribution in the next life. If it's all the world's newspapers, then who would dare to do bad things? =>There are no bad people in the world=>Won't the earth become heaven?!

1.If no one commits a crime, isn't the prison closed?

When the prison is closed, won't the prisoners have nothing to eat?

2.If you kill someone, will the police arrest you?

3.You killed someone, the court sentenced you to death, the police shot you, did the police violate morality?

Doing evil and doing good is a theory of relativity or yin-yang, which can also be called nature.

Without one of the two, it will be short-lived.

The Buddhist scriptures are right that killing will bring evil retribution, but the Buddhist scriptures also say that doing good will bring good retribution.

Horizontally, it is a peak on the side of the ridge, and the height is different from far and near.

1. The restaurant chef is not a Buddhist. If they believe in Buddhism and don't kill, then maybe they'll go to be doctors. Even though they are Buddhists, they have the freedom to kill. The Buddha is magnanimous.

Two people believe that science is actually a kind of religion, a religion that believes in the laws of nature and physical qualities. The God of science is the competent agency of man.

3. In the future, it is better to keep this kind of problem in your heart. Sensitive issues should not be raised at sensitive times.

1 will definitely be closed.

2 will be short-lived. 3 There is a scientific basis, (unknown science).

4. And Buddhism does not go against the grain.

"Natural selection, survival of the fittest" is a natural phenomenon, and you are not wrong. However, man is a highly intelligent animal. Killing, with its consequences. In order to live wiser and wiser, people talk about not killing.

If, according to the principle of "natural selection, survival of the fittest", it is normal to kill people. But if you can kill people at will, this society will be chaotic. For the sake of social stability and everyone's safety, society will make laws.

This law is a magic weapon to protect everyone and protect yourself.

Humans and animals are all life, and there is no difference between life. So, in Buddhism, in a broader sense, it is about not killing all living beings.

'Natural selection, survival of the fittest' is natural, but killing is unnatural.

In Darwin's Theory of Evolution, human existence does not say that it is reproduced and evolved by 'killing', but it is a long process of biological evolution.

Buddhism says that 'all beings are equal', and we should respect life, of course, including 'animals'.

There is no Amitabha Buddha in the south!

Someone wants to kill you, shouting "natural selection, the law of the jungle", are you willing to let him kill you? Master Confucius said, do not do to others what you do not want to be done to yourself. Got it?

You don't want to be killed, and other people, animals, don't want to be killed, because we all know that death is painful, all living beings have the right to live, and no one stipulates that animals are born to be eaten, this is just human self-righteousness. Have you ever seen a person or animal that was willingly killed? In addition, the post-90s generation is not synonymous with NC, so there is no need to specifically state that you are a post-90s generation.

I'm sure you're not NC either, you just can't figure it out. Amitabha.

'survival of the fittest' = > can that kill?

When it's our turn to be killed, you don't think so

Evolution: From apes to humans There are no fossils in between, and it's hard to justify evolution.

Amitabha, you don't recognize the Buddha. The Buddha does not advocate the emergence of gods, the Buddha advocates the theory of karma or dependent arising, the Buddha is not a god, he is an enlightened person, and anyone can cultivate to become a Buddha. A Buddha is omniscient, not omnipotent.

The Buddha advocates wisdom and faith, not superstition. Do nothing and teach what you don't say. That's why karma is the argument against killing.

Natural selection, survival of the fittest"After the changes of the world, those who can survive are the fittest, and we should respect life in the same way.

The evolution and killing you mentioned are two concepts, and the Buddha has cultivated the Buddha body after thousands of years of suffering, so it tells us: the same body of great compassion has no cause for great compassion. May my Buddha bless you with peace and health! Amitabha, hum and beautiful!

Because if you kill him, he will hate you, he will seek revenge on you in the next life, and then you will find him for revenge in the next life, so when will you repay each other, yes, there is a saying that the fittest survive, but that is the retribution he deserves, so he will die, just like you sacrificed for an animal in your previous life, and the reincarnation of that animal will die for you in this life, and the Buddha also has a saying that karma does not disappear, that is, if you die, you will die, not who killed you.

Who will cut himself with a knife? Before you kill it, you take a knife and cut yourself!

Purifying sentient beings, not transcendent sentient beings!

The Buddhist Dharma preaches that all beings are equal, so since they are equal, what position do we have on killing living beings? Buddhism exhorts people to do good and abstain from evil, and killing ends a living species, which is a great evil and is not tolerated by Buddhism. Natural selection, survival of the fittest is mostly aimed at species in nature, and we live in two worlds with them, so we cannot generalize.

When I have nothing to do, I go to the temple to listen to the Buddhist scriptures, and my thoughts will be sublimated to a certain extent, so I often go to the Jiuhua Mountain Buddhist temple.

Afraid that we often stir up our own death instincts!

Creating karmic obstacles brings bad retribution.