Is it reasonable to ask for a mortgage on the property?

Of course it doesn't make sense.

Applying for employment refers to accepting an appointment and accepting an offer. When applying for employment, the employer issues an employment request to the job seeker, and the job seeker responds to the employer's employment request according to his own needs. Before applying, you should make various psychological preparations, including social needs, career choices, salary, etc.

In order to improve the success rate of job hunting, in addition to the necessary professional knowledge and indispensable elements such as interview preparation, good psychological quality and suitable appearance, job seekers must also learn to "read words" during interviews.

In the interview, the unit and the job seeker meet directly, forming a situation of interpersonal interaction, and the job seeker learns how to understand the other party's "face", which is also an ability that cannot be ignored in the job search process. Because the interviewer's face, demeanor, and demeanor during the conversation with the candidate also express his thoughts and intentions accordingly.

This approach is unreasonable. Article 9 of the Labor Contract Law of the People's Republic of China clearly stipulates that "when an employer recruits a worker, it shall not seize the worker's resident identity card and other documents, and shall not require the worker to provide a guarantee or collect property from the worker in any other name".

I don't think such a request or practice is reasonable because the company does not have such a right to require the applicant to mortgage the property.

Unreasonable, the applicant is a vulnerable group, their property is their own private property, if it is mortgaged, their legitimate rights and interests will not be protected, and it is easy to suffer.

Irrationality. It is also suspected of violating the law. The employer does not have the right to require the applicant to mortgage the property.

Unreasonable, this is a very unreasonable request, and the company needs to make changes to attract candidates instead of relying on these tactics to make money

I don't think that's right.

Otherwise, the Coconut Tree Group would not have come out to apologize.

And there should be no relevant legal support for such an approach.

Contradicted. Because the property is the applicant's personal property, asking the applicant to mortgage the personal property is infringing on the property of others.

Yes, the application is carried out on equal terms between the two parties, and the mortgage of the property has the meaning of threat.

At present, when a group called Coconut Tree applied for a job, they asked for a mortgage on their property, which of course violated labor laws, and they apologized for their behavior. This act is contrary to the provisions of the law.

Of course, in the traditional impression of our country, a house is always very important, for today's young people, wanting to buy a house often takes most of their parents' life savings, but even in such a good location, houses in big cities are often in short supply.

And what is the attitude of many people towards the employer? the content of the work of this unit; Welfare; Wages; degree of stability; The distance from home or other advantages I am satisfied with, so I want to work here, and for this, I have to meet the recruitment requirements of this unit. Although it is said that the requirements for choosing the job are listed, realistically speaking, most people only want to find a job on two points, one is a stable job, and they don't have to worry about the midlife crisis, even if they get a dead salary; A figure with a high salary, even if you have a mid-life crisis, it doesn't matter if you are tired from work, as long as the salary is high, it allows me to save a deposit before the mid-life crisis, wait until I am fired, have a period of rest, or rely on the income "after sleeping" to support myself.

As long as these two points can be satisfied, there will be countless migrant workers who will rush to this job.

Then the problem is that the jobs that can reach the first point often belong to the "iron rice bowls" such as civil servants and teachers, and these iron rice bowls do not bother to require applicants to mortgage their real estate. The second point of work, people are here for money, if you ask people to mortgage their real estate, will they agree? How can you want to ask the applicant to mortgage a house before the salary is opened?

Even if the mortgage property is to ensure that the employees will not have two hearts, An An is assigned to the company to work, and the company gives the benefits to the people who mortgage the real estate.

However, if you can make the company personally recognize him as a talent, and hope to ask him to mortgage his real estate to ensure that he will not leave the talent, there will definitely be no shortage of offers from this company.

This means that when a company proposes that they must mortgage a house to apply for their position, ordinary people may be able to recruit a lot, but the company may not look up to ordinary people, and ordinary people may not have a house to mortgage. And those talents that companies can see, there will definitely be companies that don't need to mortgage real estate to also look at them. Even if the welfare package is a little worse, it saves a suite.

It's definitely going to have an impact. No one wants to be mortgaged when they apply for a job, which can be prohibitive for the vast majority of people.

Absolutely. Because many people come out to work hard and don't have a property, this behavior may turn away people who don't have a property.