Lawyer, here s a question.

If the assault is more than a minor injury, it is the crime of intentional injury, and stealing someone else's belongings, although it is not worth much, can be prosecuted for robbery as long as it exceeds three times.

Article 234:Whoever intentionally harms the body of another person is to be sentenced to up to three years.

fixed-term imprisonment, criminal detention or controlled release.

Whoever commits the crime in the preceding paragraph and causes serious injury to another person shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years.

Punishment; Causing death or serious bodily injury by particularly cruel means, resulting in serious disability.

shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years, life imprisonment or death. This Act is otherwise.

where provided, follow the provisions.

Article 263:Robbery of public or private property by violence, coercion, or other means.

where property is to be met, a sentence of between three and ten years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given; There is next.

In any of the circumstances, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment, life imprisonment or death is to be given.

and a fine or confiscation of property:

1) Entering a home to rob a house;

2) Robbery on public transport;

3) Robbery of banks or other financial institutions;

4) Multiple robberies or robberies where the amount of money involved is huge;

5) Robbery causing serious injury or death;

6) Pretending to be a member of the military or police to commit a robbery;

7) Robbery with firearms;

8) Looting military supplies or emergency rescue, disaster relief, or relief materials.

Summary. If it is said that he was sued by the original partner to repay the money, the junior should return the money belonging to the original partner to the other party. Because Xiao San has obtained property in violation of social order and good customs, it has seriously infringed upon the lawful property rights and interests of the co-owners of the property, and it was not obtained in good faith, even though it has been registered in his name, it is still illegal gains and should be returned.

Basis: Article 1062 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China The following property acquired by husband and wife during the existence of the marital relationship shall be the joint property of the husband and wife and shall be jointly owned by the husband and wife: (1) wages, bonuses, and remuneration for labor services; (2) Income from production, operation and investment; (3) the proceeds of intellectual property rights; (4) Inherited or donated property, except as provided for in item 3 of Article 163 of this Law; (5) Other property that shall be jointly owned.

Husband and wife have equal rights to dispose of joint property.

Hello, ask a lawyer for a little something.

Hello. If a third party is sued by the original partner, what should the third party do?

Can you specifically talk about the reason why the third party was sued by the original partner?

If it is said that he was sued by the original partner to repay the money, the junior should return the money belonging to the original partner to the other party. Because Xiao San has obtained property in violation of social order and good customs, it has seriously infringed upon the lawful property rights and interests of the co-owners of the property, and it was not obtained in good faith, even though it has been registered in his name, it is still illegal gains and should be returned. According to:

Article 1062 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China The following property acquired by husband and wife during the existence of their marital relationship is the joint property of the husband and wife and is jointly owned by the husband and wife: (1) wages, bonuses, and remuneration for labor services; (2) Income from production, operation and investment; (3) the proceeds of intellectual property rights; (4) Inherited or donated property, except as provided for in item 3 of Article 163 of this Law; (5) Other property that shall be jointly owned. Husband and wife have equal rights to dispose of joint property.

The original husband and others. If a woman has an improper relationship, she should sue a third party with the evidence of shopping in the transfer chat record, and the third party should deal with it.

Is the purpose of the lawsuit to recover the finances or is it just to recover the relevant finances?

If the purpose of the original match is to recover the finances, you can find a way to collect some WeChat chat records between her husband and you, and you can see that her husband took the initiative to give you the finances, and it is okay to have relevant audio; If you want to hold you accountable, you can rest assured that as long as you don't marry her husband, it's not illegal, it's just a moral issue, and you can't break the law!