Isn t it smart to play Chinese chess well? Learn chess at the same time and play chess with the sam

In the case of starting to play chess at the same time and playing chess for the same amount of time, playing chess well does not mean that he (she) is very smart, talent is one aspect, and it is possible that he (she) thinks more when he (she) plays chess, thinks more thoroughly, and thinks more carefully.

In fact, the congenital conditions are still relatively large, and those masters are beyond ordinary people in some aspects of the brain, but they think that the acquired effort is very important, work hard, in fact, I also like to play chess, and I have energy.

Somewhat, but not absolutely, is much lower and more experienced.

Some children are the first to open their minds, and some children are the last to open their minds. The first to open his mind is to see how far he can go. Those who are later enlightened are likely to go far, far away. It's hard to say.

What chess is played well does not mean that he is smart, because the development of a certain aspect does not mean that his IQ is fully developed.

It's not like that's how to measure the intelligence of both sides, it's mainly the following aspects.

The quality of intellectual development is one thing.

Acquired environmental education is one thing (overall view and overall planning ability), and the way of thinking is also one thing.

Being smart is part of it, but it's also about being diligent.

Yes, learning Go will also improve one's taste, cultivation and wisdom.

Not necessarily, some people don't learn!

People who like to think are always smarter, but they are not the criterion for determining IQ.

Chess increases intelligence more than Chinese chess.

And the software is definitely a quick learner.

Playing chess regularly is of course a way to improve your chess skills, but if you want to get a big improvement, you may want to choose someone with a higher level than you and play chess with you.

Absolutely. Playing chess is the same as fighting a war and arranging troops, and more practice can make you stronger.

Playing chess with different people allows you to see different chess routines.

Play chess with the masters and see the strategies of the masters using each piece.

Quickly improve your chess level cheats, you can instantly improve your chess skills, and quickly enhance your computing power.

Playing chess requires strong thinking ability, just like you are manipulating this battle, chess is a strategy, playing chess focuses on the layout, you must have a view of the overall situation, most of the good people in chess are very smart, most of these smart people are in the long-term research of chess, but people who do not play chess well are not necessarily not smart, ancient and modern talents are innumerable, but not all are chess masters, and then smart is relative, it depends on what aspect, a good person who plays chess let him study physics, he will definitely do well? So it depends on how you say it, and you should have some understanding in your heart.

The person who can ask this question must be a humble person and a wise person.

You can't say that completely, or even at all.

Chess skills can reflect the IQ level of a player from one side, but this reflection is very limited and not absolute.

Xiangqi is a miniature war that combines Chinese philosophy, military strategy, and the art of war. By learning chess, players can develop their calm thinking ability, thoughtful and comprehensive judgment ability and abstract alternative way of thinking. By learning chess, you can develop the flexibility of chess players, perseverance and courage in the face of danger.

So, what is the relationship between the IQ of chess players and the level of chess skills?

First of all, a player's level of chess skills is determined by a variety of factors such as learning methods, learning mentality, moral cultivation and IQ. Of these, learning methods play a role of more than 60%.

No matter how highly intelligent a chess player is, if he does not go through formal learning, without the guidance of a famous teacher, and only by his own exploration and learning, he can only become a junior professional level at most, and even an intermediate professional level cannot be reached. In the same way, even a chess player with an average IQ can at least become an intermediate professional chess player if he has formal learning methods and the guidance of a famous teacher.

To sum up, the level of chess skills can only reflect the intelligence level of chess players to a certain extent, but it cannot complete the reflection.

In addition, since all amateur chess players use the blind man's elephant learning method, IQ often becomes an important factor in determining the level of chess skills, and even becomes the most important determinant under this incorrect learning method.

It only shows that your talent for playing chess is not good, but it does not mean that you are not smart.

Personal feeling: level and intelligence have a little relationship, but not much. A chess master is not necessarily very smart.

Many people are not clear about the concept of "smart", and what we generally think of as "smart" is that the IQ is relatively high. In fact, it is really "smart", it is IQ+ a lot of knowledge accumulation, without knowledge accumulation, IQ is not smart no matter how high it is.

A chess master is not necessarily very knowledgeable, and anyone who plays chess a lot will naturally have a good level. If you want to go further, you need to have a considerable degree of knowledge, but unfortunately many chess players, or many people, don't quite understand this truth.

The intelligence of chess masters is generally not bad, at least above average. However, I believe that a high level of intelligence is helpful for enlightenment, and at least in a short period of time, the level can be improved, so that there can be a better interest in learning chess. But there is such a strange situation, some people play chess very well, but later because of an accident brain injury, mental deterioration, life and self-care have become a problem.

But it's still very good at chess, it's just hard to improve. It seems that after being stereotyped, the level is not very related to intelligence. Therefore, I believe that intelligence is only directly related to the ability to learn.

According to the research and investigation of hundreds of chess players and enthusiasts and some passers-by by foreign scientists, it is found that for an experienced chess player, he mainly relies on experience when playing chess, and intelligence hardly plays a role, while for those who are first exposed to chess, he mainly relies on intelligence when playing chess. Scientists have also found that there is no difference in the IQ of professional chess players and even chess champions compared to ordinary people, but their experience in playing chess far exceeds that of ordinary people.

In other words, when two inexperienced players play chess, the outcome of winning or losing can reflect the intelligence of both players, but for experienced players, winning or losing may not necessarily reflect intelligence.

The level is to represent the intelligence of the person, the chess masters are smart, and the bad play without intelligence is absolutely related to intelligence.

People who play chess well are generally people with strong calculation skills, and if you play chess well, I believe that you will be more organized in everything you do in the future.

In addition, it is not necessary that a smart person will play chess well, but if a person with low intelligence will definitely not play chess well.

Chess is similar to a craft, some learn the craft well, some can't learn it well until you die, and the same goes for chess. Smart or not smart, that's flattery.

On the question you asked:

1. There are innate differences in intelligence, if different people learn chess with the same effort, of course, those with a higher level of intelligence will play better;

2. Chess is an art, and it does not necessarily mean that people with high innate intelligence will be able to become chess masters, and people with poor intelligence cannot become masters; But one thing is certain, that is, learning chess can improve people's intellectual level. It turns out that in the same school, the class that learns chess will do better on the exam than the students in the class who don't;

3. Whether you can become a chess master, there are intellectual factors, there are also non-intellectual factors, people with average intelligence can also play chess well, but whether to become a master, or become a master at that level, depends on the person's efforts and feelings;

Fourth, it is difficult to say that it is smart, because the range is very large, people who often play chess, have more thinking exercises than ordinary people, and some chess players are more careful in their thinking.

Playing chess is related to IQ, chess masters are smart, what do you think the difference in chess is related to IQ? The level of chess is tied to IQ.

People do things, find methods, he represents life, work, basic principles; A kind of rule that is exquisite; Of course, intelligence is related, and the master is also quite intelligent and capable.

lx correct solution. It should be added that chess players who are at or near the master level have excellent memory and logical skills, which is a hardware requirement.

Let's take the example of someone who played chess with me, one was a salesperson in a shopping mall, she played chess with me in the first game and I lost one move to her, but in the second game I won her two moves, and in the third game I won her five moves. Later, I played more than ten games with her, and then she lost me more than ten moves, and in the end it was not interesting, and the gap became wider and wider, and she stopped playing. Later, I played chess with a person who was engaged in education, and I lost to her six or seven moves in the first game, three or four moves to her in the second game, and one step to her in the third game, and then I played several games with her, although the gap between me and her was getting smaller and smaller, but it was extremely difficult to win her, and the best result was a tie.

And her education level is above mine, so I think that playing chess has something to do with culture, IQ, and learning.

How good is the chess game you are talking about? Because chess is a mental + physical competition, the IQ of people who play chess to a certain level is definitely not low, so how high can it be? As long as it is a person with normal intelligence, invest a certain amount of time to learn chess, the level will be more or less improved, two people in the same situation of equal foundation at the same time to learn chess, the level will be high and low, only in this case can it be said that the higher level of people in the field of chess "IQ" is higher than another, but maybe in other fields is not as good as others!

Therefore, first of all, people with a high IQ will definitely learn anything faster than others, so people with a higher IQ will also learn chess faster than the average person. Secondly, it is normal for a person with a high IQ to learn chess for one year and not be able to play chess for five years for an ordinary enthusiast. Therefore, a good chess game does not indicate that his IQ is relatively high, but it definitely shows that his IQ is not low (not mentally retarded); But if he plays first-class or even super-first-class in the field of chess, then it can definitely be said that he is a high-IQ person.

Grandmaster Yang Guanxuan said (the original meaning is probably so), I rely on diligence and more learning to get to where I am today. (Levels and achievements).

There is naturally an element of modesty in this statement, but it is undeniable that Yang Lao also believes that the level of level is not only based on talent and IQ, but also on hard work. Therefore, if IQ is measured by chess level, then it can be said that a low IQ is definitely not good at chess, and a good IQ in chess is not necessarily very high.

A good person in chess, with a high IQ and a low IQ, can't win a lot of people, just take the chess software, the extra-large level is not a low IQ can win, you need a high IQ to win, often play low IQ is not good, and a master duel, a low IQ person will definitely not win.

It has to do with talent, if you want to become a master, you have to go through acquired training, and it is best to train from a young age.

Skill is related to the individual's perception and acuity. There is a certain correlation with intelligence. It can't be generalized.

It's all skillful ...It should have something to do with intelligence.