Is it considered a precept for a Buddha disciple to eat food containing spices?

Not counted. As long as it's not these kinds, it's fine. Onions, garlic, leeks, onions will be fine.

As long as it is not meaty, it is not considered a transgression.

There should be nothing, whether it is the five precepts of lay people or the precepts of refuge, there is no violation.

Personally, I suggest that you study the precepts, don't follow the crowd, what precepts you have received, that is, to understand what the precepts are on that day.

Absolutely, you won't even eat salt, you don't have to be a Buddha who eats fasting, and it's not a Buddha who drinks wine and eats meat, have you watched the TV series Jigong? What hasn't the Dragon Descending Arhat done? The Buddha is not so narrow-minded, although I don't understand the Buddha!

You can eat anything, as long as you really practice. Eating and drinking is what counts, the main thing is that a person's behavior is right, and he does not do evil things.

If you want to save yourself, you must repent, know the Messiah who saves us, bears us, and forgives our sins.

Try not to break the vows for your own greed, so that you can become a bodhisattva

In our eyes, the Buddhist diet belongs to the kind of light vegetarian food, and the likes of wine and meat are taboos that they cannot touch. However, when Buddhism appeared in India, there was no explicit regulation of food, because India is a country where religion is common. The diet of "a bowl of a thousand meals" is a fitting description of the Buddhists at that time, who were very selective or picky about what they were trying to do, and who received all the offerings from the peopleIn order to spread the idea of equality of all beings and the idea of good karma.

Based on the stance of compassion, eating a vegetarian diet is emphasized and encouraged by Buddhism. In fact, eating meat is both harmful to compassion and good health, so in the Mahayana scriptures such as the Sanskrit Sutra and the Lengyan Sutra, vegetarianism is emphasized, and eating meat is strictly prohibited, but it is not considered a violation under certain circumstances

If wine is used as an ingredient in a dish, if it no longer smells of alcohol and loses its intoxicating power, it should not be subject to alcohol abstinence。Therefore, the new religion in China, the so-called Rationalism, also abstains from alcohol; When it is necessary to use wine, vinegar**, for example, vinegar is used instead of cooking condiments, because the vinegar is no longer alcoholic.

The concept of cigarettes and narcotics, under the precepts of Buddhism, can also be prescribed by a doctor due to illness; Not only cigarettes, but even alcohol, if you have to use it, it is not considered a transgression. But do not be greedy for food under the pretext of curing a disease.

As for eggs,It should be fishy because it can hatch into chicks and the taste also contains a fishy smell. But now the eggs produced in chicken farms are sexless, and what you can buy in the consumer market is lifeless; From the standpoint of killing, eating asexual eggs is not a transgression, nor is it detrimental to compassion.

For dairy products,It is neither meat nor fishyBecause cattle and sheep eat grass and grains, the milk produced does not have a fishy smell. Drinking milk is neither killing, nor does it hinder the breeding of calves and lambs, and it is raised by people to control the production of milk, and will not affect the growth and development of chicks, so in the time of the Buddha, milk is commonly drunk, and dairy products are divided into five categories, such as milk, cheese, crisp, cooked crisp, and Daigo, which are daily foods and necessary nutrients, and are not among the prohibitions.

They don't break the vows by drinking dairy products and eating eggs. Although these are fishy things, they are lifeless and can be eaten by Buddhists.

Tobacco and alcohol are not considered to be abstained if they have to be used, as long as they want to quit in their hearts.

If alcohol is just an ingredient in cooking and has lost the effect of anesthesia, it is not considered a broken vow.

In Buddhism, monks are required to eat vegetarian food, and if the meal is full of fish and meat, they will break the vows.

If they are injured, disinfecting with alcohol is not considered a transgression.

I don't think it's a violation to pour some wine while cooking.

I don't think eating meat on Eid al-Fitr is a breaking of the vows.

If wine is placed in the dish as a condiment for cooking, it should not be considered a crack.

If some alcohol products are used as drugs, it should not be considered a break of the vows.

There is no greed in the heart, there is no discrimination in eating, and there is no violation of the vows in what you eat.

Some eat eggs to be foul, and some eat eggs without fouls, which depends on my brother's own decision.

To be strict is to break the vows! With the development and transformation of society. The philosophy and beliefs of the practitioners.

Whether it's current events, it's changing! According to the current situation, who can really practice?! Who can transcend mortals?!

Even though they are all Confucian students in the mortal realm! The Buddha receives a pillar of incense, and people fight for a breath and need to survive. It's inseparable from the world's fireworks appetite!

There are no strict rules! Thank you! For reference!

Talk about rules with rule-makers??? Don't be silly.

It's Wuxin! Wuxin refers to onions, garlic, leeks, garlic sprouts, garlic sprouts, onions, and their derivatives... In terms of vegetarian food, some people eat ovo-lacto-vegetarian and some people eat vegan.

In addition, celery, coriander, cumin, toon and other odorous vegetables can be eaten by yourself, but they cannot be offered to the Buddha. For practitioners who study Buddhism, Wuxin is not to be eaten.

The spices are not only five meats, but also chili peppers, fennel, etc., I have seen Qi Shan's cooking CD, which mentions that they don't use five meats.

Stupid.. There is no ingredient list for onions, garlic and leeks, and the spices are not only these five meats.

Refers to large five eggs, meat and poultry. The fifth viscera. Leek. Garlic. Onions. Pepper. Star anise.

This is not a great sin for the precepts, but it is indeed unrepentant.

As far as the oath is concerned, the oath has been completely violated, and in addition to the sin of breaking the oath, there is also the sin of deceiving the oath. This is something to repent.

True repentance is diligent practice, "a confession without recovering all sins."

There is no Amitabha Buddha in the south.

This senior brother's cautious attitude is very pleasing to the eye.

Your question doesn't have to be about the precepts. It should not be compared to the killing ring.

There are many conditions for initiating, holding, and committing crimes according to the precepts, first of all, whether you return to the Three Jewels because you are tired of samsara, and then you receive the pratimoksha vows from the ordination of Acharya, these two are indispensable.

Then there are the ki (the object of the killing), the yile (the joy of the matter), the preliminaries (the killing), and the end (the death of the killed). These four are also indispensable. That is, he who can repent.

You make a vow in front of the Buddha, and according to the Gusha Treatise, this vow will still exist and will not be destroyed as long as it is not destroyed by oneself (vows to eat meat again). Even if it's a no-brainer.

Your vow has caused you pain! The bitter sea is boundless, and the shore is back!

All problems have nothing to do with eating meat and vegetarianism, what to eat, it is all about nourishing our body. Aspiring to be vegetarian is just to do our best to respect the lives of all living beings, not to add to our own troubles. This affliction is not beneficial to you or to sentient beings, because it is only a physical Buddha, but it does not realize the compassion of the Buddha, but it gives rise to the fear of eating meat.

When the Buddha lived, he received offerings from his family and ate both meat and vegetables. That's not because he doesn't have enough compassion, it's because he only has food in his eyes. He rejoices in receiving all food equally and with fate.

Of course, because of his joy and compassion, most of the food offered was vegetarian, and that was the result of his heart.

It should also be added that most of the eggs sold in the market now cannot hatch chicks, because they are not inseminated, so they can only be regarded as vegetarian. Life begins with the union of the egg essence and the bardo body.

Hehe, there is indeed no vegetarian precept.

The precept of not killing and the must be vegetarian cannot be equated.

The rule of vegetarianism began with Emperor Wu of Liang and was not a Buddhist system.

However, if you have made a vow to be vegetarian, this is a matter of your own willingness, so the most important question of this question is not to debate whether eggs are considered vegetarian or not, and when you first made this vow, did you include not eating eggs, of course, from a personal point of view.

I don't think an unfertilized egg is considered meaty.

However, due to medical health and other reasons, you should not eat too much.

If the egg is not fertilized, it is considered vegetarian! Hehe, in fact, why cling to the precepts (besides, there are no vegetarian precepts), this is also a kind of attachment. But since you have sworn an oath, then go to the Buddha and repent.

If you can't regret it, admit it, knowing your mistakes can improve a lot.

I don't know that cloth can eat eggs, but since you keep the precepts, you have to keep the precepts, it's better to repent, no matter what you do wrong, you can think of the Buddha or repent as soon as you think of it Don't worry, you can have a Buddha in your heart.

Eating eggs is not true, and the unfertilized eggs sold in the market now are edible.

No, you don't have a lot of heart, first of all, you didn't mean it, and you don't have this in the precepts of the layman.

Wine and meat have passed through the intestines, and the Buddha stays in the heart! Keep a good heart. It's better than fasting every day and doing bad things.

An unintentional mistake is not considered a violation of the precepts, and the precepts are called precepts, but they are actually precepts.

I'm sorry, the ancient text under is not good, I don't know how to explain it. But when I think it should be said that when I kill someone, even if I kill someone with suspicion, I can't regret it. If you are not mistaken, your so-called precepts should have been the Five Precepts.

In fact, if it is self-defense and killing, it can be repented. The reason is that there was no murderous intent at that time. In the vows of non-killing, as long as there is no occurrence of murderous intent (one of the vows is missing), one can repent.

Under the assumption that you have not broken the vows because you believe what your mother says. When I eat it, I think that there are no eggs anymore. So there is no deliberate psychology.

Although it is not a deliberate vow, but it is also a violation of the oath because of your negligence, just repent. Under the view and the small cherry is the same.

Have you ever made a vow in front of the Buddha and Bodhisattva to eat a vegan diet for the rest of your life? If you make such a vow, you are breaking the vows. If you just make a wish to eat vegetarian dishes for as many days a month, then don't eat meat dishes for a few days.

You first have to understand the concept of fasting.