The original partner hit a third party and caused physical injury, and the original partner was relu

Updated on society 2024-06-05
15 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    You can sue, why can't you sue? As long as you have evidence, you can sue.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    The original partner played the junior, resulting in physical injury, and he was reluctant to sue him now, aggressive, you want to sue him, I think you are too hasty, right? This kind of thing is caused by you, you should take a good look at yourself, and just settle this matter within the family, there is no need to appeal.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Regardless of the reason, hitting a person and causing bodily harm to the person being hit is punishable. Although a period of time has passed, as long as there is evidence to prove that you have been injured, you can go to court to sue.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Regardless of the reason, hitting someone to the point of bodily harm is an offence and can be reported.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    You express it clearly, who is reluctant to be the defendant? What does it mean to not sue? Who is aggressive?

    You can't describe it, who knows what you're going to ask? You have to at least describe it clearly to help you analyze, and if you can't tell it clearly, everyone is confused, can't give you an analysis, and doesn't know what you're talking about and what to ask.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    If you have a medical report at the time, you can sue her.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    I feel that as long as it is within a certain period of time and there is a reality. Recorded or real body. The situation is okay.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    You can claim reimbursement for medical expenses. Xiao San belongs to the category of morality, hurting people belongs to the category of law, if the Xiao San is not seriously injured, the original partner is in violation of the administration of public security, the original partner may face a fine or public security detention, and also compensate the other party for medical expenses, if a settlement is reached, it will be fine, if the Xiao San constitutes a minor injury, then the original partner may be sentenced for intentional injury.

    Legal analysisIf it results in minor injuries that do not constitute the standard for filing a criminal case, the public security organs will generally mediate first, and if the two parties cannot reach an agreement, they will bear the losses caused by the victim's injuries, such as medical expenses and mental damages. If the other party refuses to compensate. The public security organs may impose administrative detention and fines, and in the case of the injured party, they may collect evidence and sue the court to claim medical expenses and related reasonable compensation through legal procedures.

    If the violation is serious, after mediation on compensation or other matters between the two parties, administrative detention is still required. If mediation fails, the public security organs may be placed under administrative detention for 15 days for violating the provisions of the Public Security Administration Punishment Law, which does not constitute criminal liability. If the police station handles the matter by means of mediation, and the parties consider it unreasonable, they may file a civil lawsuit with the court, compensate in accordance with the regulations, and claim medical expenses and related reasonable compensation expenses through legal procedures.

    If the other party is seriously injured or even endangered by life, the other party shall bear criminal responsibility and give certain compensation to reduce the victim's losses.

    Legal basisLaw of the People's Republic of China on Public Security Administration Punishments》 Article 43 Whoever assaults another person or intentionally injures another person's body shall be detained for not less than 5 days but not more than 10 days and shall also be fined between 200 and 500 RMB; where the circumstances are more minor, they are to be detained for up to 5 days or fined up to 500 RMB. In any of the following circumstances, they are to be detained for between 10 and 15 days and fined between 500 and 1,000 RMB: (1) Gang beating or injuring others; (2) Beating or injuring a disabled person, a pregnant woman, a person under the age of 14, or a person over the age of 60; (3) Repeatedly beating or injuring others, or beating or injuring multiple people at a time.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    OK. If the intentional injury constitutes a minor injury, criminal liability is also borne.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Of course, the dispute over the right to health is two legal relationships and is not involved.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The junior is originally legitimate, and I'm embarrassed to charge your family for medical expenses, so I think it's better to solve it yourself!

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    This is definitely okay, this is a criminal matter, and it is completely possible to claim compensation.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Legal Analysis: The original partner who beats a third party meets the standard of crime is legally responsible. If the standard for filing a case for the crime of intentional injury is not met, the person shall be liable for civil compensation.

    Legal basis: Article 234 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China: Where the body of another person is intentionally harmed, a case shall be filed. Intentional injury to another person is constituted only when the statutory standard of minor injury or serious injury is met, and the crime of intentional injury is constituted, and a case is filed.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Under the current legal provisions, there is indeed no direct legal way for the original spouse to pursue the legal responsibility of a third party for destroying marriage and family. In the process of interpretation and revision of the Civil Code, there have been ** and debates about this, most of them believe that the duty of loyalty to the spouse should be adjusted by moral norms, and it is difficult for the law to regulate emotional problems. Whether or how "spousal rights" should be protected is still a subject of study.

    If a spouse cohabits with another person resulting in a divorce, the innocent party has the right to claim damages. However, according to the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on the Marriage Law, the person responsible for the marriage can only be pursued here, and the spouse of the innocent party in the marriage relationship is not a third party, and can only be claimed when a divorce lawsuit is filed.

    Therefore, when a marriage encounters a third party, if there is evidence to prove that the spouse has cohabited with the third party, then in the process of divorce litigation by the court, the innocent party can ask the court to order the at-fault party to bear moral damages and demand an appropriate amount of property division.

    If you do not sue for divorce and want to pursue the legal responsibility of a third party, you can only have legal means when the third party infringes on the rights and interests of the husband and wife's joint property, for example, if the spouse gives a large amount of property to a third party without authorization, because of the infringement of the joint property of the husband and wife, the innocent party can sue to revoke the gift and return the property, so as to protect its own property rights and interests. Of course, there is also an extreme case of spousal bigamy, that is, the spouse conceals his identity and re-registers the marriage with a third party or lives together in the name of husband and wife, which constitutes the crime of bigamy, and the original spouse can sue the court to demand the criminal responsibility of the spouse and the third party, and if the third party knows that the other party is married and remarries with him, it can constitute a crime.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Legal analysis: Xiao San can be sued if he is beaten by the original match, and he must be legally responsible if he meets the standard of crime. If the standard for filing a case for the crime of intentional injury to the hungry is not met, the person shall be liable for civil compensation.

    It depends on the severity of the injury, and the minor injury or more is the crime of intentional injury.

    Legal basis: Article 1024 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Civil subjects enjoy the right to reputation. The right to reputation of others must not be infringed upon by any organization or individual by insulting or slandering others.

    Reputation is the social evaluation of the character, prestige, talent, and credit of a civil subject.

Related questions
10 answers2024-06-05

My stationery box.

I have a normal stationery box. >>>More

9 answers2024-06-05

First of all, he is definitely not a third party. I wonder if he knows about your relationship? I think he's innocent. >>>More

11 answers2024-06-05

I think it's a bit hard to say... The third party is a person who violates the social legal agreement, destroys the feelings of both parties, or interferes with the feelings of both parties. (Outsiders, stirring up the relationship between the two sides.) of this person). Purely personal. >>>More

8 answers2024-06-05

You have to figure out what your major is now, if you are sure that you are a lifelong friend with this man in your life, then don't study, go to accompany him, there is not much pure love in this society, you don't even care about studying for this "sweet" first love, you will regret it, these problems, put it after the college entrance examination, I advise you. >>>More

18 answers2024-06-05

tttttttt!!

I highly recommend!! >>>More